发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Puer bonus communicandi peritus. Esercizi e strumenti per dibattere tra pari 额外的通信peritus。平等辩论的练习和工具
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.12
Gianluca Simonetta
{"title":"Puer bonus communicandi peritus. Esercizi e strumenti per dibattere tra pari","authors":"Gianluca Simonetta","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.12","url":null,"abstract":"The peer learning project RApP (Ragazze e Ragazzi apprendono tra Pari) took place at the ISIS Gobetti-Volta high school in Bagno a Ripoli, Florence. With the aim to develop debate and public speaking activities, the project applies the IDEAM method, known as the five canons of ancient rhetoric (Inventio, Dispositio, Elocutio, Actio and Memoria). Thanks to this framework, it is possible to visualize and apply changes to the organization and writing of an effective speech, as well as to its memorization and delivery in public. A platform of applied training combined with a set of propaedeutic exercises based on the approach of ancient progymnasmata outlines a gradual pathway aimed at strengthening the uses of language as an individual skill, with a view to acquiring the skills to use language in the social environment of debate.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"47 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114112631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From the Virtues of Argumentation to the Happiness of Dispute 从辩论的美德到辩论的快乐
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.04
Bruno Mastroianni
{"title":"From the Virtues of Argumentation to the Happiness of Dispute","authors":"Bruno Mastroianni","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.04","url":null,"abstract":"Efficient debate training should develop the ability to manage real discussions and not just be a laboratory for ideal talks. In this regard, the perspective of the virtues of argumentation is particularly suitable. Virtuous arguing allows the recognition of the other's difference – the contemplation of difference. Using Aristotelian ideas of contemplation as happiness opens up the possibility of accepting the arguers' imperfections and configure disputes suitable for producing shared outcomes, making them genuinely deliberative.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"47 21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132406243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Filosofia e dibattito. Le Meditazioni Cartesiane come esempio di deliberazione filosofica 哲学与辩论。笛卡尔冥想是哲学思考的一个例子
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.13
Caterina Gabrielli
{"title":"Filosofia e dibattito. Le Meditazioni Cartesiane come esempio di deliberazione filosofica","authors":"Caterina Gabrielli","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.13","url":null,"abstract":"This essay relates the content of an educational experience that applies the methodology of debate to the closer examination of an argumentative philosophical text, in the form of a deliberation with oneself. The text in question is Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, specifically the first, the second, the sixth meditation and respective Objections. The class involved in the activity is the IV B of the Liceo classico Alessandro Manzoni in Lecco.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130738505","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Odyssey' Scientific Debate: Rhetoric STEM Education 奥德赛科学辩论:修辞STEM教育
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.10
Foteini Egglezou
{"title":"Odyssey' Scientific Debate: Rhetoric STEM Education","authors":"Foteini Egglezou","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.10","url":null,"abstract":"Τhe Erasmus+ KA2 Odyssey project aims at introducing debates on STEM topics in European schools for cultivating the scientific, argumentative and critical literacy as well as the communication skills of students in secondary education (13-19 years old). In Greece, the testing phase (October 2019-June 2020) involved 18 STEM educators and 126 students from 11 schools. The debate format, which combined elements of Oxford and Public Forum, aimed at making students realize that scientific ideas and practices are not absolute, objective and immutable and therefore require discussions based on convincing arguments supported by relevant and sufficient evidence. The first findings of the project were encouraging, revealing that the rhetorical turn in the teaching of science through debates is purposeful for promoting advances in the modern STEM classroom despite the barriers that hinder analogous efforts.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125424015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Il dibattito come rischio educativo 辩论是一种教育风险
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.06
Maria Załęska
{"title":"Il dibattito come rischio educativo","authors":"Maria Załęska","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.06","url":null,"abstract":"«It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it», says a quote from Joseph Joubert. Debate is one of the most valued text genres and is therefore included in curricular or extracurricular academic activities. What do we teach by teaching how to debate? What do students learn by learning how to debate? They can compete, collaborate and might even develop a new skill. Since concrete educational choices reflect a certain underlying educational philosophy, in what follows the model proposed by Biesta (2010,2016,2017) will be illustrated. The theoretical knowledge drawn from this framework will then be applied to the analysis of the Oxford Debate, in the version adopted by the regulated debate tournaments in Poland as well as to the discussion of a modification of the Oxford Debate itself, inspired by the concept of 'risk of education' (or rather, 'The Beautiful risk of educatio', as the title of one of Biesta’s books reads).","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115120519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving Argumentative Skills in Education: Three Online Discussion Tools 提高教育中的辩论技巧:三种在线讨论工具
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.09
Jan Albert van Laar
{"title":"Improving Argumentative Skills in Education: Three Online Discussion Tools","authors":"Jan Albert van Laar","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.09","url":null,"abstract":"How can we foster sound argumentation and valid criticism in education? How to help students to avoid fallacies, resist polarization, respond wisely to misleading information, and how to make them produce arguments that are genuinely responsive to the position of those they address? I sketch a dialogical account of the nature of sound argument and criticism. Then, I discuss two types of argumentative dialogue: persuasion dialogue and negotiation dialogue. Finally, I explain how software applications provide an opportunity for students to analyse, evaluate and produce arguments, and to critically think about the design of discussion procedures. I also discuss a third software application that enables teachers and advanced students to themselves design online discussion procedures, so as to experiment with them and to advance their understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of various design choices. This paper support the idea that students’ argumentative skills will be enhanced by letting them engage in the online discussion procedures presented.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115961473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Rhetorical Model of Debating 辩论的修辞模式
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.05
Stephen M. Llano
{"title":"A Rhetorical Model of Debating","authors":"Stephen M. Llano","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.05","url":null,"abstract":"A rhetorical model of the debate centered on the image of a labyrinth is more suitable than the metaphor of debate-as-game in describing the benefits of arguing in front of an audience. The labyrinth best expresses that proceeding by successive choices, coming and going, and sometimes retracing one's steps, typical of the debate activity. The basic thesis is that arguing is a continuous adaptation of one's speeches according to the audience that listens. In fact, in the labyrinth, what matters is not only arriving at the outcome - the exit or reaching the center of the structure - but the path you choose to get there is equally important. More than the definitive and winning argument, which rarely occurs in discussions, the labyrinth teaches us to recognise the plurality of approaches adopted when faced with an issue.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115520735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Online Critical Debate Model: Designing and Analyzing Deliberation for the Digital Age 在线批判性辩论模式:设计与分析数字时代的思考
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.08
Claudio Fuentes Bravo, Julián Goñi Jerez
{"title":"Online Critical Debate Model: Designing and Analyzing Deliberation for the Digital Age","authors":"Claudio Fuentes Bravo, Julián Goñi Jerez","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.08","url":null,"abstract":"Through our experience during a large-scale public engagement exercise in Chile we draw conclusions to adapt and improve the Critical Debate Model to an online format. We highlight the importance of epistemic opposition and structured annotation for the execution of debates, while also exploring the possibilities of automated analysis using Natural Language Processing. We conclude by describing how an online version of the Critical Debate Model could be implemented.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133375057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Introduzione 引言
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.02
Adelino Cattani, Bruno Mastroianni
{"title":"Introduzione","authors":"Adelino Cattani, Bruno Mastroianni","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.02","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129665943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Il peso delle emozioni nell’argomentazione sui social media 情感在社交媒体争论中的分量
Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.11
Goffredo Guidi, Gianmarco Tuccini
{"title":"Il peso delle emozioni nell’argomentazione sui social media","authors":"Goffredo Guidi, Gianmarco Tuccini","doi":"10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-329-1.11","url":null,"abstract":"Social media are nowadays fertile ground for debates that are often rich in arguments of persuasive value. In the present writing, we hypothesize that emotions play a significant role in determining the success of arguments on social media. In order to validate the hypothesis, we analyzed Change My View, an Internet forum on Reddit where the persuasiveness of the discussions among participants is explicit and regulated by specific norms. Our analysis revealed that arguments enjoying a higher degree of success were characterized by two particular emotions: anticipation and joy, which we interpret as belonging to engagement, a more general emotional dimension that includes them both. Such characteristics of successful arguments lead us to consider the persuasive experience on social media as analogous to a playful experience. Like in a game, in order to successfully take part in such a persuasive experience, certain requirements are needed: commitment and respect for the rules as well as joyful participation.","PeriodicalId":168873,"journal":{"name":"Competing, cooperating, deciding: towards a model of deliberative debate","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125825754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信