IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic)最新文献

Subject the Protection of Individual Information Privacy to Its Limits 个人信息隐私保护要有限度

IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic) Pub Date : 2017-10-16 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3267036

Jinting Deng

{"title":"Subject the Protection of Individual Information Privacy to Its Limits","authors":"Jinting Deng","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3267036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3267036","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the conflicts between the requirements of big data development for data development and those of the current individual information privacy protection system. It analyzes the over emphasis on self-determination regarding data development, which causes practical problems, and argues that such emphasis should respect the scope where data subjects could make subjective determination. It further argues that the existence of public sphere during data processing and the scope of self-determination are prerequisites to find information privacy interest, and thus the protection shall be subject to such limits. Accordingly, it proposes a three-step protective framework. Step One, when either of the two prerequisites is missing, no privacy exists and big data development shall be regulated through a multi-party participating mechanism which considers privacy risk as one of many factors. Data subjects shall have the right to data resource. Such arrangement provides the legitimacy for the development of big data. Step Two, when both exist, privacy exists and data development shall be regulated through a balance test which may reinterpret traditional privacy corners. Step Three, when privacy prevails in the balance test, data development shall respect the self determination of data subjects, which includes strengthened consent or even customer expectations requirements. The article concludes with implications of the framework for current information privacy protection system.","PeriodicalId":167594,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132053305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How to throw the race to the bottom: revisiting signals for ethical and legal research using online data 如何将这场竞赛推至谷底:利用在线数据重新审视伦理和法律研究的信号

IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic) Pub Date : 2014-12-31 DOI: 10.1145/2738210.2738211

Erin E. Kenneally

引用次数: 3

The Collision between Big Data and Privacy Law 大数据与隐私法的碰撞

IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic) Pub Date : 2014-08-31 DOI: 10.18080/JTDE.V2N3.283

Stephen Wilson

引用次数: 3

Protecting Post-Mortem Privacy: Reconsidering the Privacy Interests of the Deceased in a Digital World 保护死后隐私:重新考虑数字世界中死者的隐私利益

IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic) Pub Date : 2013-11-10 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2267388

L. Edwards, Edina Harbinja

{"title":"Protecting Post-Mortem Privacy: Reconsidering the Privacy Interests of the Deceased in a Digital World","authors":"L. Edwards, Edina Harbinja","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2267388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2267388","url":null,"abstract":"Post-mortem privacy is not a recognised term of art or institutional category in general succession law or even privacy literature. It may be termed the right of a person to preserve and control what becomes of his or her reputation, dignity, integrity, secrets or memory after their death. While of established concern in disciplines such as psychology, counselling and anthropology, this notion has till now has received relatively little attention in law, especially common law. We argue that the new circumstances of the digital world, and in particular the emergence of a new and voluminous array of “digital assets” created, hosted and shared on web 2.0 intermediary platforms, and often revealing highly personal or intimate personal data, require a revisiting of this stance. An analysis of comparative common and civilian law institutions, focusing on personality rights, defamation, moral rights and freedom of testation, confirms that there is little support for post-mortem privacy in common law, and while personality rights in general have greater traction in civilian law, including their survival after death, the primary role taken by contract regulation may still mean that users of US-based intermediary platforms, wherever they are based, are deprived of post mortem privacy rights. Having establshed a crucial gap in online legal privacy protection, we suggest future protection may need to come from legislation, contract or “code” solutions, of which the first emergent into the market is Google Inactive Account Manager.","PeriodicalId":167594,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134360956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 34

New Challenges to Data Protection Study - Comparative Chart: Divergencies between Data Protection Laws in the EU 资料保护的新挑战研究-比较图表:欧盟资料保护法律的差异

IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic) Pub Date : 2010-02-15 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1638951

D. Korff

引用次数: 0

Administrative Transaction Data 管理事务数据

IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic) Pub Date : 2009-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1445349

J. Lane

引用次数: 3