How to throw the race to the bottom: revisiting signals for ethical and legal research using online data

Erin E. Kenneally
{"title":"How to throw the race to the bottom: revisiting signals for ethical and legal research using online data","authors":"Erin E. Kenneally","doi":"10.1145/2738210.2738211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With research using data available online, researcher conduct is not fully prescribed or proscribed by formal ethical codes of conduct or law because of ill-fitting \"expectations signals\" -- indicators of legal and ethical risk. This article describes where these ordering forces breakdown in the context of online research and suggests how to identify and respond to these grey areas by applying common legal and ethical tenets that run across evolving models. It is intended to advance the collective dialogue work-in-progress toward a path that revisits and harmonizes more appropriate ethical and legal signals for research using online data between and among researchers, oversight entities, policymakers and society.","PeriodicalId":167594,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Innovation & Privacy Law & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2738210.2738211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

With research using data available online, researcher conduct is not fully prescribed or proscribed by formal ethical codes of conduct or law because of ill-fitting "expectations signals" -- indicators of legal and ethical risk. This article describes where these ordering forces breakdown in the context of online research and suggests how to identify and respond to these grey areas by applying common legal and ethical tenets that run across evolving models. It is intended to advance the collective dialogue work-in-progress toward a path that revisits and harmonizes more appropriate ethical and legal signals for research using online data between and among researchers, oversight entities, policymakers and society.
如何将这场竞赛推至谷底:利用在线数据重新审视伦理和法律研究的信号
由于研究使用在线数据,研究人员的行为没有被正式的道德行为准则或法律完全规定或禁止,因为不合适的“期望信号”——法律和道德风险的指标。本文描述了这些排序力量在在线研究的环境中崩溃的地方,并建议如何通过应用在不断发展的模型中运行的常见法律和道德原则来识别和响应这些灰色地带。它的目的是推动正在进行的集体对话朝着一条重新审视和协调更适当的伦理和法律信号的道路前进,以便在研究人员、监督实体、决策者和社会之间使用在线数据进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信