Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality最新文献_第2页

Truth, suffering and religious diversity 真理、苦难和宗教多样性

Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality Pub Date : 2019-08-05 DOI: 10.4324/9780429019678-3

S. Pihlström

引用次数: 0

Maimonides and Kierkegaard on fictionalism, divine hiddenness and the scope for interreligious dialogue 迈蒙尼德和克尔凯郭尔关于虚构主义，神的隐蔽性和宗教间对话的范围

Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality Pub Date : 2019-08-05 DOI: 10.4324/9780429019678-6

N. Verbin

引用次数: 0

The epistemic implications of religious diversity 宗教多样性的认知意义

Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality Pub Date : 2019-08-05 DOI: 10.4324/9780429019678-8

J. Cottingham

引用次数: 0

General introduction 总体介绍

Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality Pub Date : 2019-08-05 DOI: 10.4324/9780429019678-1

P. Jonkers, Oliver J. Wiertz

引用次数: 0

Respecting religious otherness as otherness versus exclusivism and religious pluralism 尊重作为他者的宗教他者性，反对排外主义和宗教多元主义

Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780429019678-11

D. Grube

{"title":"Respecting religious otherness as otherness versus exclusivism and religious pluralism","authors":"D. Grube","doi":"10.4324/9780429019678-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429019678-11","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter distinguishes respecting religious Otherness as Otherness from exclusivism and religious pluralism: The exclusivist fails to respect the religious Other, pluralists (e.g., John Hick) fail to respect the Otherness of the religious Other (rather, they regard it to be sameness in disguise). The kind of interreligious dialogue implied in respecting religious Otherness differs from the kind implied in exclusivism and pluralism: The exclusivist does not engage in a serious dialogue since she possesses the truth and the religious Other does not, the pluralist is interested only in the commonalities with the religious Other. Different from that, respecting religious Otherness as Otherness implies a “robust interreligious dialogue” in which believers mirror their own religion in light of the other religion and learn from each other. In order to get such a dialogue off the ground, we should abandon the principle of bivalence in the religious realm. Rather than considering religious beliefs which differ from our own to be false, we should acknowledge that the person holding them could be justified to do so (although we continue disagreeing with her). Abandoning bivalent truth in favour of the concept of justification is the heart of the “justified religious difference approach” recommended in this chapter. It makes a robust interreligious dialogue, differing from the kind of dialogues implied in exclusivism and pluralism, possible.","PeriodicalId":166183,"journal":{"name":"Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114520850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Introduction to Part I: the truth-aptness of religious discourse and the problem of realism in relation to religious diversity and pluralism 第一部分导论:宗教话语的真理性及与宗教多样性和多元主义相关的现实主义问题

Religious Truth and Identity in an Age of Plurality Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780429019678-2

S. Pihlström

引用次数: 1