Managerial Compensation/ Performance Measurement最新文献

筛选

英文中文

Limiting the Effect of Attribution and Construal Errors on Strategy Evaluation Using a Strategic Performance Measurement System 利用战略绩效测量系统限制归因和解释错误对战略评价的影响

Managerial Compensation/ Performance Measurement Pub Date : 2011-12-01 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1983501

Lan Guo, Theresa Libby, Bernard Wong-On-Wing, Dan Yang

{"title":"Limiting the Effect of Attribution and Construal Errors on Strategy Evaluation Using a Strategic Performance Measurement System","authors":"Lan Guo, Theresa Libby, Bernard Wong-On-Wing, Dan Yang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1983501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1983501","url":null,"abstract":"The multiple performance measures included in strategic performance measurement systems (SPMS), including the balanced scorecard, should be selected to represent a set of causally-linked strategic drivers and outcomes (Ittner and Larcker 2001, 2005; Chenhall 2005; Kaplan and Norton 1996). The pattern of results thus can provide useful information concerning the proper execution of the underlying strategy (i.e., the performance evaluation role) and the strength of the cause-and-effect linkages assumed by the strategy (i.e., the strategy evaluation role). Unfortunately, managers’ tendency to re-examine strategy when divisional performance falls short of target is relatively low in practice (Campbell et al. 2008; Ittner and Larcker 2005). Possible explanations include attribution error (i.e., the tendency to attribute poor financial results to poor subordinate performance rather than to strategic factors) and construal error (i.e. the tendency to focus on specific individual performance metrics instead of the overall pattern of results presented in a complicated SPMS) (Koonce et al. 2011). We experimentally examine two decision aids designed to help strategic business unit managers avoid attribution and construal errors. Results of our first experiment indicate that the decision aids, individually as well as interactively, increase managers’ tendency to re-examine strategy. We find consistent results in a second experiment that examines the effects of the two decision aids (when used together) on evaluators’ judgment under a different pattern of driver and outcome performance, and among a sample of more experienced managers.","PeriodicalId":156310,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Compensation/ Performance Measurement","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123492420","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Budgetary Participation: The Effects of Information Asymmetry, Goal Commitment, and Role Ambiguity on Job Satisfaction and Performance 预算参与:信息不对称、目标承诺和角色模糊对工作满意度和绩效的影响

Managerial Compensation/ Performance Measurement Pub Date : 2010-10-19 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1694667

Johnny Jermias

引用次数: 5