Xutong Zhang, Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp, Elizabeth A. Skowron
{"title":"Dynamic physiology–behavior association patterns in child welfare parents predict response to parenting intervention.","authors":"Xutong Zhang, Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp, Elizabeth A. Skowron","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000966","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000966","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Dynamic Physiology–Behavior Association Patterns in Child Welfare Parents Predict Response to Parenting Intervention","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000966.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000966.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910610","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Transdiagnostic Interventions in Prediagnostic Youth With Elevated Distress: A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000968.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000968.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marcela Radunz, Catherine Johnson, Tim Dalgleish, Roz Shafran, Tracey D. Wade
{"title":"Transdiagnostic interventions in prediagnostic youth with elevated distress: A meta-analysis of outcomes.","authors":"Marcela Radunz, Catherine Johnson, Tim Dalgleish, Roz Shafran, Tracey D. Wade","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000968","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000968","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Long-Term Effects of the Pregnant Moms’ Empowerment Program (PMEP) on Intimate Partner Violence Revictimization, Maternal Mental Health, and Child Internalizing and Externalizing Problems","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000976.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000976.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910607","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kathryn H. Howell, Hannah C. Gilliam, Jessica R. Carney, Catherine A. Maloney, Laura E. Miller-Graff
{"title":"Long-term effects of the Pregnant Moms’ Empowerment Program (PMEP) on intimate partner violence revictimization, maternal mental health, and child internalizing and externalizing problems.","authors":"Kathryn H. Howell, Hannah C. Gilliam, Jessica R. Carney, Catherine A. Maloney, Laura E. Miller-Graff","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000976","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144910608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Credibility and expectations: Important factors for understanding clinical response, treatment completion, and dropout in internet-delivered psychological interventions.","authors":"Blake F Dear","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000969","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000969","url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVESeveral large studies have identified perceptions of treatment credibility and treatment outcome expectations as potential moderators of treatment response in internet-delivered psychological treatment. However, no studies have specifically focused on these two constructs and their potential roles in the moderation of treatment-related change, treatment completion, or study dropout.METHODAdult samples were derived from four large randomized controlled trials examining internet-delivered treatment for symptoms of depression (n = 445), generalized anxiety (n = 454), social anxiety (n = 486), and panic disorder (n = 292). In these studies, relevant symptom measures were administered at pretreatment and posttreatment, and credibility and expectancy were assessed in Week 2 after participants had had some experience with treatment.RESULTSTreatment credibility and outcome expectations were relatively high overall, with a majority of participants scoring in the upper ranges. Both variables significantly moderated treatment response across all symptom domains. Specifically, each 1-point increase in either average credibility scores or average expectancy scores were associated with a 5%-8% reduction in symptoms at posttreatment. Higher treatment credibility and outcome expectations were also significantly associated with increased treatment completion and lower rates of study dropout or missingness.CONCLUSIONSThe findings suggest that perceptions of treatment credibility and outcome expectancies are important factors in understanding treatment engagement and response to internet-delivered interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"724 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144769830","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Michael G McDonell, Sara Parent, Julianne D Jett, Mohammad Keshtkar, Katharine Palmer, Rachael Beck, Diana Tyutyunnyk, Michael Williams, Douglas L Weeks, Naomi S Chaytor, Sterling McPherson, Sean M Murphy, Richard K Ries, John M Roll
{"title":"Testing adaptations to contingency management for alcohol use disorders: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Michael G McDonell, Sara Parent, Julianne D Jett, Mohammad Keshtkar, Katharine Palmer, Rachael Beck, Diana Tyutyunnyk, Michael Williams, Douglas L Weeks, Naomi S Chaytor, Sterling McPherson, Sean M Murphy, Richard K Ries, John M Roll","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000960","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000960","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if adults with an alcohol use disorder (AUD), who had a preintervention urine ethyl glucuronide (uEtG) level predictive of nonresponse to contingency management (CM), would respond to two intervention modifications (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ID: NCT03481049).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred fifty-eight adults (53.2% female) with AUD, serious mental illness, and a mean uEtG ≥ 350 ng/mL over a 4-week induction period were randomized to (a) usual CM (uEtG-negative [<150 ng/mL] samples reinforced with $1,686); (b) high magnitude CM (uEtG-negative samples reinforced with $2,983); or (c) shaping CM (reduced drinking [uEtG < 500 ng/mL] samples reinforced for 4 weeks, then uEtG-negative samples reinforced for 12 weeks with $1,686). The primary outcome was uEtG-negative samples during induction and Weeks 5-16 of CM. The relationship between outcomes and uEtG-defined heavy drinking (≥ 500 ng/mL) immediately prior to randomization was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CM conditions did not differ in uEtG-negative samples during the intervention period, Wald, χ²(2) = 1.96, <i>p</i> = .46. Participants were 4.2 times (95% CI [3.02, 5.92], <i>p</i> < .01) more likely to submit a uEtG-negative sample during CM, relative to induction. Those with a heavy drinking uEtG result immediately before randomization were less likely to submit uEtG-negative samples during CM, Wald, χ²(1) = 15.33, <i>p</i> < .01.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CM modifications were not associated with lower levels of alcohol use. Participants engaged in less alcohol use during CM, relative to induction. Two patterns of response to CM were observed based on uEtG-defined heavy drinking immediately prior to CM. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":" ","pages":"540-550"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144505833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Susan J Harnas, Kim F Francken, Fabiola Müller, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Hans Knoop, Annemarie M J Braamse
{"title":"The efficacy of personalization within psychological treatments compared to no or less personalization: A meta-analysis and systematic review.","authors":"Susan J Harnas, Kim F Francken, Fabiola Müller, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Mirjam A G Sprangers, Hans Knoop, Annemarie M J Braamse","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000964","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000964","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis and systematic review assessed whether personalization within psychological treatments for mental health problems or persistent somatic symptoms improves treatment outcomes, compared to non- or less personalized treatments.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>APA PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched up to January 14, 2024, for randomized controlled trials comparing within-treatment personalization against no or less personalization. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Additionally, a three-level meta-analysis was conducted, and moderation analyses were performed. A narrative synthesis was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included. Risk of bias was low for two studies and high for three studies, and 11 studies had some concerns. Effect sizes were calculated for the subgroups: symptoms, smoking cessation, and treatment process outcomes. For symptoms, the pooled standardized mean difference was 0.07 (95% CI [-0.06, 0.20], p = .28); for smoking cessation, the pooled odds ratio was 1.12 (95% CI [0.84, 1.51], p = .43); and for treatment process outcomes, the pooled standardized mean difference was 0.29 (95% CI [-0.27, 0.85], p = .31). Treatment format (in person/online), personalization factor (preference/individual profile), or personalized treatment aspect (content/modules) did not moderate the effect of personalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence of moderate quality does not convincingly suggest that within-treatment personalization outperforms no or less personalization with respect to treatment outcome. Using evidence-based personalization strategies, future studies should clarify which degree of personalization yields clinically relevant effects for which populations, interventions, and outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 8","pages":"564-579"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144855371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Skye Fitzpatrick, Alexander O Crenshaw, Robert Valela, Christina Samonas, Elizabeth A Earle, Sophie Goss, Kristen M Hernandez, Julianne Bushe, Sonya Varma, Don Proctor, Anne C Wagner, Kamya Goenka, Omega Luxor, Alexis Collins, Leslie Morland, Norman Shields, Maya Roth, Brian D Doss, Jeremiah Schumm, Candice M Monson
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial testing couple HOPES: An online, self-help couples' intervention for posttraumatic stress disorder.","authors":"Skye Fitzpatrick, Alexander O Crenshaw, Robert Valela, Christina Samonas, Elizabeth A Earle, Sophie Goss, Kristen M Hernandez, Julianne Bushe, Sonya Varma, Don Proctor, Anne C Wagner, Kamya Goenka, Omega Luxor, Alexis Collins, Leslie Morland, Norman Shields, Maya Roth, Brian D Doss, Jeremiah Schumm, Candice M Monson","doi":"10.1037/ccp0000965","DOIUrl":"10.1037/ccp0000965","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This article presents a randomized waitlist-controlled trial testing Couple HOPES, a coach-guided, online intervention for couples wherein one member had posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Aims involved examining whether Couple HOPES resulted in greater improvements in PTSD symptoms, relationship satisfaction, and secondary outcomes compared to a waitlist, whether outcomes were maintained over a 3-month follow-up, and whether outcomes differed if PTSD was COVID-19-related.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Sixty-seven couples were recruited, where one partner met criteria for likely PTSD and was either a military member, veteran, first responder, health care worker, and/or whose PTSD symptoms were related to COVID. Couples were randomized to receive Couple HOPES immediately or after 8 weeks. Outcomes were measured at the beginning, middle, and end of Couple HOPES/the waiting period, and 1- and 3-months after Couple HOPES. Measures of PTSD and relationship satisfaction were also completed during each of seven modules.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intent-to-treat analyses showed greater improvements in self- and informant-reported PTSD in those receiving Couple HOPES relative to waiting, with large- and medium-effect sizes, respectively. Partners without PTSD symptoms reported greater improvements in relationship satisfaction in Couple HOPES compared to the waitlist with a small effect size, but people with PTSD symptoms did not. Uncontrolled follow-up showed reversion of gains in some outcomes. Whether PTSD was COVID-19-related did not significantly moderate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the efficacy of this low-cost, scalable intervention for improving PTSD, regardless of the means through which it was acquired (COVID-19-related or not). Further testing with larger sample sizes is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15447,"journal":{"name":"Journal of consulting and clinical psychology","volume":"93 8","pages":"580-594"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144855369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}