{"title":"New Legislation","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394564","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394564","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “New Legislation” are abstracts of legislation enacted by the states addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as energy and environmental measures, subdivision and lot regulations, and powers of the planning commission.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114304834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Height Restrictions near Airports: Physical Takings, Regulatory Takings, or Police Power Exercises?","authors":"Jan G. Laitos","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394562","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394562","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A case pending before the Nevada Supreme Court could be a seminal decision in the often-litigated arena of takings law. The case, County of Clark v. Tien Fu Hsu, Lisa Family Trust, involves the constitutionality of a height restriction imposed by Clark County. The restriction affects privately owned buildings and structures near McCarran Airport (the airport serving Las Vegas). The restriction was intended to prevent the creation of aviation hazards for airplanes that might need additional maneuvering room close to the runways of the airport.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115692637","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394563","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394563","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129793082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judicial Decisions","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394560","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Judicial Decisions” are abstracts of federal and state court decisions addressing issues of importance to the land use lawyer and planner, such as zoning, inverse condemnation, growth management, signs and billboards, vested rights, and many more.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114739058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Region 7: An Innovative Approach to Planning on or near Public Lands","authors":"Daniel Kemmis","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394558","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Federal public lands dominate many western landscapes, and are therefore a major factor in western land use planning. The public lands themselves, though, are planned and managed through an outmoded centralized system that, although well intentioned and seeking to achieve worthy public policy objectives, all too often leads to gridlock and frustration. At the same time, the West is experiencing tremendous growth that local communities have done far too little to address. This commentary suggests an alternative approach—dubbed “Region 7”—for planning and managing federal forest lands that could address both of these problems at once. It would create a “virtual” region made up of individual national forests that major public land stake-holders—including neighboring local communities—could propose for experimental management programs. In exchange for being given more responsibility for, and flexibility in, developing and implementing plans for these forests, local communities would be expected to better plan private lands under their jurisdiction and to integrate that planning with forest planning.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116030917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394561","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394561","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129099843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"California County and City Win Battle over Billboards","authors":"Pam J. Walls","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394559","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394559","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Both the County of Riverside and the City of San Mateo have emerged victorious from lawsuits and appeals filed against them by billboard operators seeking to prevent them from removing their illegal signs.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131171274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394557","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394557","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127283062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Tyranny of the Majority: The Buckeye Decision on Fairness, Fair Housing and Referenda","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394548","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394548","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this issue, six experts in land use law present their views of the U.S. Supreme Court's March 25, 2003 decision in the case of City of Cuyahoga Falls v. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation, which concerned a developer's claim for damages due to permitting delays resulting from a referendum process used by citizens to stop a low-income housing project. Below is a chronological abstract of the case, followed by commentaries by Stuart Meck, FAICP, John Payne, Peter Buchsbaum, Dwight Merriam, FAICP, Anthony Cresap, and David Collies, FAICP.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116712429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hiding in Plain Sight: Private Prejudice, State Action, and “Devotion to Democracy”","authors":"J. M. Payne","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2003.10394550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2003.10394550","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract State action has proven a treacherous constitutional field in recent decades, with the U.S. Supreme Court all too frequently confusing state action analysis with the merits of the constitutional claim. Buckeye continues this unhelpful trend. Logically, state action analysis should be undertaken first, and without regard to the merits, because if the state is not responsible for the conduct complained of, either directly or by entanglement with private actors, then the Fourteenth Amendment cannot be invoked at all.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122290096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}