Crime Psychology Review最新文献

Environmental factors in juvenile delinquency: A systematic review of the situational perspectives’ literature 青少年犯罪的环境因素:情境视角文献的系统回顾

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2019.1591693

Alexander Trinidad, Laura Vozmediano, César San-Juan

{"title":"Environmental factors in juvenile delinquency: A systematic review of the situational perspectives’ literature","authors":"Alexander Trinidad, Laura Vozmediano, César San-Juan","doi":"10.1080/23744006.2019.1591693","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2019.1591693","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims to summarise and integrate the accumulated knowledge on recent literature analysing the situational factors of juvenile delinquency and draw future avenues for research. A review of recent empirical papers published on two relevant databases allowed us to gather a sample of 88 papers published from 2010 to 2017 that analyse the role of situational factors of delinquent behaviour using quantitative methods and applying one of the situational theories. The results highlight the robustness of some situational and environmental variables for a deeper understanding of juvenile antisocial behaviour by putting it into context. There is a considerable amount of evidence to corroborate the impact of unstructured leisure activities on antisocial behaviour, or the role of home location in establishing a geographic area of action. However, there is ambiguous evidence on other aspects: i.e. guardianship needs to be understood and measure in a more complex way, and the role of physical design of the places where juvenile delinquency happens deserves further analysis. Future research lines from this perspective are needed and will offer relevant improvements for better understanding juvenile delinquency and designing more effective preventive measures.","PeriodicalId":144915,"journal":{"name":"Crime Psychology Review","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130488350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Comparing factors related to school-bullying and cyber-bullying 比较校园欺凌和网络欺凌的相关因素

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2018.1474029

Calli Tzani-Pepelasi, M. Ioannou, J. Synnott, S. Ashton

{"title":"Comparing factors related to school-bullying and cyber-bullying","authors":"Calli Tzani-Pepelasi, M. Ioannou, J. Synnott, S. Ashton","doi":"10.1080/23744006.2018.1474029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2018.1474029","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The purpose of this review was to present a comparative summary of literature of the risk and preventative factors related to school bullying (SB) and cyber-bullying (CB), while identifying research gaps.Literature on bullying appears to disagree whether CB should be considered as a different form of bullying or as a sub-type of SB. Researchers, in an attempt to understand bullying, examined in depth numerous risk and preventive factors. Based solely on previous research papers, fourteen risk and preventative factors related to SB and likewise to CB, were selected on the basis that are most commonly indicated as strong factors in preceding works; each factor was searched for in relation to SB and CB separately, allowing a comparison of how each factor relates to SB and likewise to CB. Findings present a comparative picture of the factors related to SB and CB and provide a direction in the area of factors for fellow researchers wishing to develop anti-bullying strategies in the future. As expected the present study found that some factors are similarly related to SB as to CB, and others differentiate. Details of findings, limitations and implications are further discussed.","PeriodicalId":144915,"journal":{"name":"Crime Psychology Review","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124983944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

Measuring offending: self-reports, official records, systematic observation and experimentation 衡量冒犯:自我报告，官方记录，系统观察和实验

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2018.1475455

H. Gomes, Â. Maia, D. Farrington

{"title":"Measuring offending: self-reports, official records, systematic observation and experimentation","authors":"H. Gomes, Â. Maia, D. Farrington","doi":"10.1080/23744006.2018.1475455","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2018.1475455","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Criminological knowledge can only be as accurate as the measure of crime itself. Concern with crime measurement starts with the definition of crime, which has consequences for the measurement techniques preferred in different domains. The two main methodologies used to measure criminal behaviour are official records (ORs) and self-reports (SRs) of offending. Although some researchers are concerned about ORs being filtered and deeply flawed estimates of criminal activity, others doubt that people can or will provide reliable information about their own criminal behaviour by completing a survey. In this article, we present a historical overview of the development of these techniques and discuss some of the main results of comparing ORs and SRs of offending. Throughout this discussion, we explore to what extent criminological conclusions differ depending on the measurement method and the potential implications of these differences. Finally, we present some alternative ways to measure offending, such as systematic observation, which could prove to be very important in improving criminological knowledge. In a period when criminologists seem to be increasingly concerned with the validity of measures of crime, this article reviews the major issues in crime measurement, as well as the advantages and limitations of the primary methodologies.","PeriodicalId":144915,"journal":{"name":"Crime Psychology Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125763194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 25

Statement of Retraction 撤回声明

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2017.1339975

引用次数: 0

Male rape: what we know, don’t know and need to find out—a critical review 男性强奸:我们知道什么，不知道什么，需要发现什么——一个批判性的回顾

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2019.1591757

J. Pearson, Deborah E. Barker

引用次数: 6

Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Factors that Impact Proceedings in the Courtroom 揭露儿童性虐待:影响法庭诉讼程序的因素综述

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2018.1472421

Guy C. M. Skinner

{"title":"Disclosure of Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of Factors that Impact Proceedings in the Courtroom","authors":"Guy C. M. Skinner","doi":"10.1080/23744006.2018.1472421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2018.1472421","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The act of disclosure is a key moment in the process of bringing alleged child sexual abuse (CSA) to court and is, therefore, a frequent point of contention for lawyers. Yet no article has systematically addressed the current applied psychological literature regarding the act of disclosure by alleged CSA victims relating to the courtroom process. This is a survey-style literature review, which seeks to establish the factors necessary for academics, practitioners, jurors and policy makers alike to study in order to be fully informed about the domain of CSA disclosure both before and then inside the courtroom.Children often delay disclosing for a long period and this may be affected by specific case characteristics. Lawyers question children about their disclosures in very different ways with both the defence and prosecution utilizing developmentally inappropriate questioning methods to advance their respective arguments. Children also respond differently to the prosecution and defence, with variations in both content and detail provided within their answerA challenge exists to be able to balance the securing of accurate testimony – especially given developmental differences – with the freedom of defendants to challenge such crucial evidence in the manner of their choice. This article highlights some of the implications of the current system which can effect any optimum assessment of the important process of victim disclosure, both outside and within the courtroom.","PeriodicalId":144915,"journal":{"name":"Crime Psychology Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132320179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Drawing-based deception detection techniques: a state-of-the-art review 基于绘图的欺骗检测技术:最新的回顾

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2017.1393986

E. M. Giolla, P. Granhag, Zarah Vernham

{"title":"Drawing-based deception detection techniques: a state-of-the-art review","authors":"E. M. Giolla, P. Granhag, Zarah Vernham","doi":"10.1080/23744006.2017.1393986","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2017.1393986","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The current article presents a concise overview of the emerging literature on drawing-based deception detection techniques. We cover the theoretical rationale of such techniques as well as the main results from the extant empirical studies. These studies have primarily looked at differences in the drawings between truth tellers and liars in terms of quality (e.g. detail, plausibility) and consistency (both within-group, and between-statement). The findings highlight drawings as a promising tool to elicit differences between truth tellers and liars on such cues. The article also examines more practical aspects, such as practitioners’ experience of the approach and preference for the approach in training studies. Finally, the susceptibility of the approach to counter-measures and directions for future research are discussed. Although research on drawing-based deception detection techniques is still very much in its infancy, results of this first round of studies are promising. They indicate the potential of incorporating drawings into real-life investigative interviews as a cheap, effective, and easy-to-use approach to deception detection.","PeriodicalId":144915,"journal":{"name":"Crime Psychology Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122189380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, impulsivity, and low self-control: which is most useful in understanding and preventing offending? 注意缺陷多动障碍、冲动和低自制力:哪一个对理解和预防犯罪最有用?

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2017.1365470

Marta M. Aguilar-Cárceles, D. Farrington

{"title":"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, impulsivity, and low self-control: which is most useful in understanding and preventing offending?","authors":"Marta M. Aguilar-Cárceles, D. Farrington","doi":"10.1080/23744006.2017.1365470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2017.1365470","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Among the most important individual factors that predict offending are hyperactivity, impulsivity, and poor attention. Psychiatrists regard these factors as a clinical syndrome termed attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This article reviews the most recent definitions of ADHD in DSM-5 and the extent to which it predicts later offending and substance use. Psychologists focus on risk factors such as impulsivity rather than ADHD, and sociologists assume that all these factors reflect low self-control. This article also discusses the value of focusing on impulsivity and low self-control as risk factors for offending, and the usefulness of risk-focused prevention (targeting these risk factors) in reducing offending, compared with methods of treating ADHD (e.g. using Ritalin). We argue that the psychological approach of studying risk factors such as impulsivity is preferable to defining an ADHD psychiatric syndrome or a possibly tautological construct of self-control. The article concludes by recommending new longitudinal research that is needed to advance knowledge about developmental sequences including hyperactivity, impulsivity, poor attention, offending, and later life outcomes, and new randomized experiments that are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of different intervention programmes.","PeriodicalId":144915,"journal":{"name":"Crime Psychology Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126665233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Third-party responses to injustice: a review on the preference for compensation 第三方对不公正的回应:对补偿偏好的回顾

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2018.1470765

J. van Doorn, Lieve Brouwers

引用次数: 10

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Psychopathic personality characteristics amongst high functioning populations 撤稿文章:高功能人群中的精神病人格特征

Crime Psychology Review Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/23744006.2016.1232537

N. Brooks, K. Fritzon

引用次数: 7