Min-Jae Kim, Yuna Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Youn, Jaeyoung Chun
{"title":"Balancing safety and effectiveness in colonoscopy for older adults: a narrative review.","authors":"Min-Jae Kim, Yuna Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Youn, Jaeyoung Chun","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colonoscopy is becoming more widely used in older adults for screening and diagnostic evaluation of colorectal cancer. While advanced age itself is not a contraindication, elderly patients often present unique challenges, including frailty, comorbidities and polypharmacy, which increase the risk of complications during the procedure. Rather than chronological age alone, frailty is important in risk assessment and clinical decision-making before performing a colonoscopy. This review summarizes recent evidence, particularly from large cohort studies and clinical guidelines, to provide a balanced evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of performing colonoscopies on older adults. Ultimately, we emphasize the importance of judicious patient selection, customized bowel preparation and tailored sedation management to optimize the safety and effectiveness of colonoscopy in this vulnerable group.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145206541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Antonio Tursi, Giammarco Mocci, Francesco Costa, Linda Ceccarelli, Edoardo Savarino, Caterina De Barba, Caterina Mucherino, Elvira D'Antonio, Laura Montesano, Manuela Marzo, Franco Scaldaferri, Daniele Napolitano, Daniela Pugliese, Antonietta Gerarda Gravina, Raffaele Pellegrino, Rocco Spagnuolo, Francesco Luzza, Antonio Cuomo, Laura Donnarumma, Giovanni Maconi, Giovanni Cataletti, Lorenzo Bertani, Giorgia Bodini, Andrea Pasta, Simona Piergallini, Mariaelena Serio, Antonella Scarcelli, Pietro Capone, Fabio Cortellini, Stefano Rodino, Ladislava Sebkova, Giuliana Vespere, Silvia Sedda, Vittorio D'Onofrio, Leonardo De Luca, Federica Gaiani, Stefano Kayali, Cristiano Pagnini, Maria Giovanna Graziani, Maria Carla Di Paolo, Leonardo Allegretta, Alessia Immacolata Cazzato, Stefano Scorza, Antonio Ferronato, Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, Giovanni Aragona, Patrizia Perazzo, Giacomo Forti, Michela Di Fonzo, Federico Iacopini, Roberta Pica, Claudio Cassieri, Francesca Maria Onidi, Paolo Usai Satta, Walter Elisei, Marcello Picchio, Alfredo Papa
{"title":"Filgotinib effectiveness and safety as second or third-line therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis: data from a real-world study.","authors":"Antonio Tursi, Giammarco Mocci, Francesco Costa, Linda Ceccarelli, Edoardo Savarino, Caterina De Barba, Caterina Mucherino, Elvira D'Antonio, Laura Montesano, Manuela Marzo, Franco Scaldaferri, Daniele Napolitano, Daniela Pugliese, Antonietta Gerarda Gravina, Raffaele Pellegrino, Rocco Spagnuolo, Francesco Luzza, Antonio Cuomo, Laura Donnarumma, Giovanni Maconi, Giovanni Cataletti, Lorenzo Bertani, Giorgia Bodini, Andrea Pasta, Simona Piergallini, Mariaelena Serio, Antonella Scarcelli, Pietro Capone, Fabio Cortellini, Stefano Rodino, Ladislava Sebkova, Giuliana Vespere, Silvia Sedda, Vittorio D'Onofrio, Leonardo De Luca, Federica Gaiani, Stefano Kayali, Cristiano Pagnini, Maria Giovanna Graziani, Maria Carla Di Paolo, Leonardo Allegretta, Alessia Immacolata Cazzato, Stefano Scorza, Antonio Ferronato, Davide Giuseppe Ribaldone, Giovanni Aragona, Patrizia Perazzo, Giacomo Forti, Michela Di Fonzo, Federico Iacopini, Roberta Pica, Claudio Cassieri, Francesca Maria Onidi, Paolo Usai Satta, Walter Elisei, Marcello Picchio, Alfredo Papa","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Real-world data on the use of filgotinib (FILGO) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited. This study aims to provide consistent results on the effectiveness and safety of FILGO in treating UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective assessment of clinical and endoscopic activity was conducted in a cohort of patients with UC according to the full Mayo score. The primary co-endpoints of the study were the evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of FILGO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 102 patients with a median follow-up of 24 weeks (interquartile range, 8-24 weeks). At 8 weeks and the end of follow-up, clinical remission was achieved by 38 (37.2%) and 47 (46.1%) patients, respectively. Clinical remission was achieved in 13 of 18 patients (72.2%) receiving first-line therapy, 7 of 19 patients (36.8%) receiving second-line therapy, and 27 of 65 patients (41.5%) receiving third-line therapy (P= 0.002). Clinical remission at 8 weeks predicted clinical remission at the end of follow-up (P= 0.021). Age > 40 years (P= 0.046) and being on second- or third-line of treatment (P= 0.005) were negative predictors for clinical remission. Seventy-one patients (69.6%) achieved a clinical response. At endoscopic evaluation, mucosal healing was observed in 18 out of 30 patients (60.0%). Steroid-free remission was present in 38 out of 46 patients (82.6%). Five patients (4.9%) needed colectomy. Adverse events were recorded in 6 patients (5.8%): 2 cases (2%) were severe, requiring discontinuation of FILGO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our real-world data confirms that FILGO is safe and effective for patients with UC. Its efficacy is significantly improved when used as a first-line treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145185775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness and safety of carotegrast methyl in patients with ulcerative colitis: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Ryoji Koshiba, Kazuki Kakimoto, Takuya Inoue, Makoto Sanomura, Mitsuyuki Murano, Hiroaki Ito, Yoshihiko Nakanishi, Ken Kawakami, Noboru Mizuta, Keijiro Numa, Naohiko Kinoshita, Kei Nakazawa, Azusa Hara, Yuki Hirata, Naokuni Sakiyama, Shoko Arimitsu, Takako Miyazaki, Shiro Nakamura, Hiroki Nishikawa","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Carotegrast methyl is a novel small-molecule drug that inhibits α4 integrin. It is prescribed for up to 6 months in patients with moderate ulcerative colitis who have demonstrated an inadequate response to or intolerance of 5-aminosalicylic acid. However, only a few clinical trials have been conducted to assess its effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carotegrast methyl in patients with ulcerative colitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study included patients with active ulcerative colitis treated with carotegrast methyl between March 2022 and October 2024. The primary outcome was the clinical remission rate following treatment with carotegrast methyl. Secondary outcomes included the clinical response rate, predictors of clinical remission, ulcerative colitis relapse rate after discontinuing carotegrast methyl, and incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 62 patients who received carotegrast methyl treatment. The median duration of administration was 84 days, with 48.4% of patients achieving clinical remission at the time of carotegrast methyl discontinuation. In 42 patients with corticosteroid/advanced therapies-naive disease, the clinical remission rate was 54.8%. Multivariate analysis identified the baseline partial Mayo score as an independent predictor of clinical remission. Among those who achieved clinical remission, 34.8% experienced a relapse with a median time to relapse of 152 days. Adverse events occurred in 8 patients, but none were serious.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carotegrast methyl demonstrated good efficacy and safety, potentially benefiting patients with low baseline disease activity. This drug may be a useful treatment option to consider before systemic corticosteroid therapy for ulcerative colitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144821410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kiandokht Bashiri, Mark C Mattar, Alireza Meighani, Andrew L Mason
{"title":"Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in inflammatory bowel disease: linking immunometabolism, lipid signaling, and therapeutic potential.","authors":"Kiandokht Bashiri, Mark C Mattar, Alireza Meighani, Andrew L Mason","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, is a chronic condition marked by immune dysregulation, genetic predisposition, and metabolic disturbances. Emerging evidence highlights the role of lipid metabolism and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling in modulating immune responses in IBD. PPAR-γ and PPAR-α regulate macrophage polarization, T-cell differentiation, and epithelial barrier integrity, influencing disease severity and progression. Alterations in PPAR activity contribute to metabolic stress and inflammation, linking IBD pathophysiology to immunometabolism. Studies suggest that targeting PPARs may mitigate inflammation through modulation of cytokine production, immune cell function, and gut microbiota interactions. In this review, we focus specifically on CD and explore how PPAR signaling intersects with mesenteric adipose tissue dysfunction and microbial dysbiosis, 2 hallmark features of CD. PPAR agonists, already used in metabolic-inflammatory diseases such as metabolic-associated liver disease, have demonstrated antiinflammatory effects in experimental colitis models. Translating these findings into clinical applications could offer novel treatment strategies for CD. Future research should focus on clinical trials, genetic studies, and microbiota-targeted approaches to elucidate PPAR-driven mechanisms in CD pathogenesis. Understanding the interplay between PPARs, lipid metabolism, and immune responses may lead to innovative therapeutic strategies, improving disease management and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144816624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Arshdeep Singh, Garima Juyal, Ranko Gacesa, Mohan C Joshi, Vandana Midha, B K Thelma, Rinse K Weersma, Ajit Sood
{"title":"Cross-ethnic evaluation of gut microbial signatures reveal increased colonization with oral pathobionts in the north Indian inflammatory bowel disease cohort.","authors":"Arshdeep Singh, Garima Juyal, Ranko Gacesa, Mohan C Joshi, Vandana Midha, B K Thelma, Rinse K Weersma, Ajit Sood","doi":"10.5217/ir.2024.00216","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2024.00216","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has become a global health concern. With the growing evidence of the gut microbiota's role in IBD, studying microbial compositions across ethnic cohorts is essential to identify unique, populationspecific microbial signatures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed stool samples and clinical data from 254 IBD patients (226 ulcerative colitis, 28 Crohn's disease) and 66 controls in northern India using metagenomic shotgun sequencing to assess microbiota diversity, composition, and function. Results were replicated in 436 IBD patients and 903 controls from the Netherlands using identical workflows. Using machine learning, we evaluated the generalizability of Indian IBD signals to the Dutch cohort, and vice versa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Indian IBD patients exhibited reduced bacterial diversity and an abundance of opportunistic pathogens, including Clostridium, Streptococcus, and oral bacteria like Streptococcus oralis and Bifidobacterium dentium. There was a significant loss of energy metabolic pathways and distinct co-occurrence patterns among microbial species. Notably, 39% of these signals replicated in the Dutch cohort. Unique to the Indian cohort were oral pathobionts such as Scardovia, Oribacterium, Actinomyces dentalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Both Indian and Dutch IBD patients shared reduced butyrate producers. Machine-learning diagnostic models trained on the Indian cohort achieved high predictive accuracy (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.95) and moderately generalized to the Dutch cohort (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IBD patients across populations exhibit shared and unique microbial signatures, suggesting a role for the oral-gut microbiome axis in IBD. Crossethnic diagnostic models show promise for broader applications in identifying IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637031","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Week 2 remission with vedolizumab as a predictor of long-term remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study.","authors":"Taku Kobayashi, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Satoshi Motoya, Toshimitsu Fujii, Reiko Kunisaki, Tomoyoshi Shibuya, Minoru Matsuura, Ken Takeuchi, Sakiko Hiraoka, Hiroshi Yasuda, Kaoru Yokoyama, Noritaka Takatsu, Atsuo Maemoto, Toshiyuki Tahara, Keiichi Tominaga, Masaaki Shimada, Nobuaki Kuno, Mary Cavaliere, Kaori Ishiguro, Jovelle L Fernandez, Toshifumi Hibi","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Vedolizumab (VDZ), a gut-selective monoclonal antibody for ulcerative colitis (UC) treatment, has no established biomarkers or clinical features that predict long-term remission. Week 2 remission, a potential predictor of long-term remission, could inform maintenance treatment strategy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational chart review included patients with UC in Japan who initiated VDZ between December 2018 and February 2020. Outcome measures included 14- and 54-week remission rates in patients with week 2 and non-week 2 remission (remission by week 14), 54-week remission rates in patients with week 14 remission and primary nonresponse, and predictive factors of week 2 and week 54 remission (logistic regression).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 332 patients with UC (176 biologic-naïve and 156 biologic-non-naïve) were included. Significantly more biologic-naïve than biologic-non-naïve patients achieved week 2 remission (36.9% vs. 28.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.94; P= 0.0224). Week 54 remission rates were significantly different between week 14 remission and primary nonresponse (both groups: P< 0.0001), and between week 2 and non-week 2 remission (all patients: OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.30-4.48; P= 0.0052; biologic-naïve patients: OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.10-5.24; P= 0.0280). Week 2 remission predictors were male sex, no anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha exposure, and normal/mild endoscopic findings. Week 54 remission was significantly associated with week 2 remission and no tacrolimus use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Week 2 remission with VDZ is a predictor of week 54 remission in patients with UC. Week 2 may be used as an evaluation point for UC treatment decisions. (Japanese Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT-1080225363).</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of carotegrast methyl in active ulcerative colitis: a real-world prospective cohort study.","authors":"Takahiro Shimoyama, Takayuki Yamamoto, Haruka Miyao, Saki Aota, Shoichi Morita, Ryohei Sakaguchi","doi":"10.5217/ir.2025.00046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2025.00046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Carotegrast methyl, an oral α4-integrin inhibitor, was recently approved for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC). However, real-world data regarding its efficacy and safety remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of carotegrast methyl in patients with active UC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with active UC received carotegrast methyl at a dosage of 960 mg three times daily. Treatment was discontinued at 8 weeks for patients who achieved endoscopic remission. For those not achieving endoscopic remission, treatment was continued for up to 24 weeks. Clinical and endoscopic assessments were performed at 8 and 24 weeks to evaluate treatment progress.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 50 UC patients, 45% achieved clinical remission, and 22% achieved endoscopic remission by week 8. Of those who discontinued treatment after reaching endoscopic remission, 55% experienced relapse during a median follow-up period of 30 weeks. For patients who continued treatment through 24 weeks, 52% achieved clinical remission, with a cumulative remission maintenance rate of 74.2%. Mild adverse events were reported in 6% of patients, including hyperamylasemia, hepatic dysfunction, and elevated biliary enzymes, all of which resolved after discontinuation of treatment. In 8 patients who relapsed and were re-administered carotegrast methyl, 62.5% achieved clinical remission, demonstrating the drug's effectiveness and safety in re-treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Carotegrast methyl effectively induces both clinical and endoscopic remission in patients with active UC and has a favorable safety profile. Re-administration is safe and effective for patients experiencing relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":14481,"journal":{"name":"Intestinal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144637032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}