Wittgenstein-Studien最新文献_第3页

Sein und Schein (bei Wittgenstein) 执照与担保

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0002

R. Raatzsch

引用次数: 0

Of Beetles and Roubles: Wittgenstein and Dostoevsky on Intention 《甲虫与卢布:维特根斯坦与陀思妥耶夫斯基论意图》

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0008

Tea Lobo

引用次数: 0

Certainties and Rule-Following 确定性和规则遵循

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0003

A. Krebs

引用次数: 0

St Augustine and All That: Remarks on the beginning of Philosophical Investigations 圣奥古斯丁和那一切:哲学研究的开端

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0007

J. Schulte

{"title":"St Augustine and All That: Remarks on the beginning of Philosophical Investigations","authors":"J. Schulte","doi":"10.1515/witt-2022-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2022-0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract One way of identifying the beginning of the Investigations is by deciding to regard remark 1, and hence neither the motto nor the Preface but the famous quotation from Augustine, as the real starting point of Wittgenstein’s reflections as developed in this book. One point implicit in this decision is that the notion of a language-game is placed in the foreground of Wittgenstein’s discussion. In a way, the language-game of the builders (2) is Wittgenstein’s paradigm of a language-game – but why is it treated differently from the shopkeeper scene (last paragraph of remark 1) in the sense that the latter is not given a separate number? This question appears particularly urgent in view of the fact that in earlier manuscript versions of the Investigations Wittgenstein did allot a separate number to the shopkeeper scene. Towards the end of this paper I make an attempt to answer that question. But in order to get down to this a number of additional questions are raised focussing on Wittgenstein’s use of central terms like “game” (Spiel), “operate”, “sample” (Muster) and drawing on distinctions elaborated in the literature, such as Benacerraf’s distinction between “transitive” and “intransitive” kinds of counting. This reading of the beginning of the Investigations is impregnated with the conviction that later parts of the book can fruitfully be seen as growing out of the remarks immediately following the quotation from Augustine.","PeriodicalId":141976,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein-Studien","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123806742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Tiefgehende Uneinigkeiten aus Logisch-Pragmatischer Sicht 从逻辑实用角度看有深层次的分歧

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0011

H. Wendler

{"title":"Tiefgehende Uneinigkeiten aus Logisch-Pragmatischer Sicht","authors":"H. Wendler","doi":"10.1515/witt-2022-0011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2022-0011","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Deep Disagreements from the Logico-Pragmatical Point of View: An Analysis of Disagreements Based on Moyal-Sharrock’s Interpretation of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty. Argumentation is central to philosophy. One of its primary functions is to resolve disagreement. Yet, there are cases of disagreement that undercut the conditions of possibility for argumentation themselves: deep disagreements. In his seminal paper, Fogelin (2005) conceived of deep disagreements in Wittgensteinian terms by highlighting their “grammatical” character. Other than normal disagreements, which are located in the space of giving and receiving reasons, deep disagreements are concerned with what enables reasoning in the first place. Hence, they cannot be rationally resolved. Drawing on an interpretation of Moyal-Sharrock’s (2007) account of Wittgensteinian certainties, my logico-grammatical account proposes that deep disagreements pertain to certainties, viz. non-proposional ways of acting in the life-world that are epistemologically basic. Furthermore, the logico-grammatical analysis entails a gradual conception of the transition from normal to deep disagreements by differentiating different types (universal, local, personal, linguistic) and origins (instinctive, acquired) of certainties and specifying which forms of certainty can and cannot be dropped. Also, it allows to identify participating in the human form of life and discursive capabilities as conditions of possibility of disagreements. Consequently, it can specify the turning-point at which disagreement transforms into mere difference. It is at this point that the focus of a dispute switches from the rationality of the discourse to that of the agents of discourse.","PeriodicalId":141976,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein-Studien","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124905115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

On the concept of childhood in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations 论维特根斯坦《哲学研究》中的童年概念

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0009

Florian Franken Figueiredo

{"title":"On the concept of childhood in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations","authors":"Florian Franken Figueiredo","doi":"10.1515/witt-2022-0009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2022-0009","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the sparse literature that is concerned with Wittgenstein’s views regarding children and childhood, in his later work, it is often suggested that Wittgenstein presents, or at least is committed to, a romantic notion of the child according to which children should be conceived of as innocent beings who are ontologically different from adults. In this paper I argue that Wittgenstein’s remarks do not support such an interpretation. First, I investigate the arguments for this view presented by Stanley Cavell, Yasushi Maruyama, and Philip Shields. Second, I consider an anti-essentialist understanding of Wittgenstein’s concept of childhood that has been suggested in opposition to the treatment of the child as the ‘ontological other’ and argue that Wittgenstein refers to the child as intermediate link with which to state grammatical facts. In contrast to these various views, I hold, third, that the PI is committed to a strong and substantial concept of childhood. I argue for this claim on the basis of (i) the ‘Motto’ of the PI; (ii) Wittgenstein’s reference to the philosopher Augustine; and (iii) the use of ‘primitive’. I conclude that Wittgenstein’s concept of childhood in his later works neither romanticises nor dispraises the child as the ‘ontological other’.","PeriodicalId":141976,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein-Studien","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121840316","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

„Unsere Aufgabe ist es nur gerecht zu sein“ 我们的责任是保持公正

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0006

Jasmin Trächtler

{"title":"„Unsere Aufgabe ist es nur gerecht zu sein“","authors":"Jasmin Trächtler","doi":"10.1515/witt-2022-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/witt-2022-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract “Our task is merely to be just”: Courtroom Scenarios in Wittgenstein’s Last Writings. As is well known, it was a Parisian court trial that inspired Wittgenstein to write his picture theory of language in the Tractatus logico-philosophicus – but less well known or at least far less reflected, are the courtroom scenarios he himself invented in his last writings, that is the writings dating from 1947 to 1951. There, Wittgenstein repeatedly sketches court proceedings by means of which he challenges the validity of certain statements and modes of expression in the manner of a thought experiment, so it seems as if the courtroom serves to check and rebuke those misleading modes of expression that distort the ordinary use of language and to which we repeatedly let ourselves be tempted when philosophising. In the following, I will trace the role of these courtroom scenarios in Wittgenstein’s last writings and suggest that they primarily fulfil the methodological function of a touchstone for certain philosophical modes of expression and misleading images, and in this way help to survey the actual use of language. After a brief overview of the occurrences of courtroom scenarios in Wittgenstein’s Nachlass, I will take a closer look at some of these courtroom remarks in his later writings with regard to the modes of expression and misleading images problematised by Wittgenstein: these include the importance of inner processes, the ‘picture of the hidden inner’ as well as Moorean knowledge assertions and ‘unreasonable’ doubts. Based on this, I will finally elaborate on the methodological function of Wittgenstein’s courtroom scenarios.","PeriodicalId":141976,"journal":{"name":"Wittgenstein-Studien","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131687648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Juliet Floyd, Felix Mühlhölzer: Wittgenstein’s Annotations to Hardy’s Course of Pure Mathematics. An Investigation of Wittgenstein’s Non-Extensionalist Understanding of the Real Numbers. 2020 朱丽叶·弗洛伊德，菲利克斯Mühlhölzer:维特根斯坦对哈代纯数学课程的注解。试论维特根斯坦对实数的非外延理解。2020

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0013

Esther Heinrich-Ramharter

引用次数: 0

Hinweise auf Gott 怎样认识上帝

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0005

Esther Heinrich-Ramharter

引用次数: 0

Bernhard Ritter, Dennis Sölch (Hrsg.): Wittgenstein und die Philosophiegeschichte. 2021 伯恩哈德·骑士，丹尼斯·莱厄奇出版社:维塔根斯坦与哲学历史

Wittgenstein-Studien Pub Date : 2022-03-14 DOI: 10.1515/witt-2022-0012

Jan Kerkmann

引用次数: 0