{"title":"The Mini-Cog: A Community Screening Tool for Dementia in Indonesia","authors":"Yuda Turana, Nicolas Farina, Imelda Theresia, Tara Puspitarini Sani, Ika Suswanti, Fasihah Irfani Fitri, Emiliano Albanese, Adelina Comas-Herrera, Martin Knapp, Sube Banerjee","doi":"10.1002/gps.70033","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Early detection of dementia enables more effective planning and can enable access to treatment and support. The Mini-Cog is a widely used screening instrument in Indonesia; however, this instrument has never undergone a translation and cultural adaptation process. Currently, there is no data on how accurate the tool is against diagnostic criteria, particularly in low-education.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Embedded within the community-based dementia prevalence study was the Strengthening Responses to Dementia in Developing Countries (STRiDE) project; older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) were randomly recruited from sites in Jakarta and North Sumatra, Indonesia. All participants were asked to complete the Mini-Cog and the 10/66 short dementia diagnostic schedule. The accuracy of three Mini-Cog algorithms (Mini-Cog1, Mini-Cog2, and Mini-Cog3) were compared against and the 10/66 short dementia diagnostic schedule. Additional analysis explored its performance accuracy at different educational levels.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Mini-Cog test performance assessment was conducted on 2098 older adults</p>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The area under the curve (AUC) of Mini-Cog1, Mini-Cog2, and Mini-Cog3 receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.66, 0.62, and 0.64, respectively. All algorithms demonstrated high sensitivity (Sv) but low specificity (Sp). (Mini-Cog1: Sv 83.2%; Sp 49.2%, Mini-Cog2: Sv 87.1%; Sp 37.8% and Mini-Cog3: Sv 72.5%; Sp 56%). All algorithms showed no affected by education. Only 59.1% of people without dementia could do the CDT.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The high sensitivity of the Mini-Cog1 algorithm lends itself to screening purposes. Given that the specificity is still low, and less than 60% of patients without dementia can complete the CDT. Further research is needed, as is the development of screening instruments with high accuracy values in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in Indonesia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142835636","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
T. Rune Nielsen, Alexandre de Mendonça, Lutz Frölich, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Dianne Gove, Daphné Lamirel, Clara Calia, Gunhild Waldemar
{"title":"Assessment of Dementia in Minority Ethnic Groups in Europe: A 14-Year Follow-Up Survey","authors":"T. Rune Nielsen, Alexandre de Mendonça, Lutz Frölich, Sebastiaan Engelborghs, Dianne Gove, Daphné Lamirel, Clara Calia, Gunhild Waldemar","doi":"10.1002/gps.70034","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70034","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>There is no European consensus on good clinical practice for timely diagnosis and culturally appropriate care of people with dementia from minority ethnic groups. Despite significant advances in culture-sensitive dementia diagnostics, little is known about how this has been implemented in clinical practice. The aims of this follow-up survey were to explore current practices for assessing dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups in Europe and to determine whether barriers in access to specialized dementia services have changed during the last 14 years.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in the European Alzheimer's Disease Consortium (EADC) in June 2023. The survey utilized questionnaires from a previous EADC survey from 2009 and focused on different points in the clinical assessment of dementia in patients from minority ethnic groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Thirty-three centers from 15 countries participated in the survey, of which 21 were the same as in the 2009 survey. Patients from minority ethnic groups were seen on a regular basis in 91% of these centers, which was a significant increase compared to 2009 (69%, <i>p</i> = 0.04). Despite perceived clinical expertise increasing, implemented strategies for bypassing cultural and linguistic barriers were sparse and communication problems and lack of adequate assessment tools continued to be the main perceived barriers in diagnostic assessment of dementia in minority ethnic groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Patients from minority ethnic groups are increasingly being referred for diagnostic assessment of dementia in Europe. Despite some improvements, diagnostic challenges generally remained the same as in 2009 and there is a continuous need to implement effective cross-cultural communication and assessment practices.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634820/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142812385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Josyane Lau, Monica Cations, Mary O'Malley, Vasileios Stamou, Jan R. Oyebode, Jacqueline H. Parkes, Janet Carter, Samantha M. Loi
{"title":"Establishing Gold Standard Assessment for Young Onset Dementia: A Modified E-Delphi Consensus Survey Based in Australia","authors":"Josyane Lau, Monica Cations, Mary O'Malley, Vasileios Stamou, Jan R. Oyebode, Jacqueline H. Parkes, Janet Carter, Samantha M. Loi","doi":"10.1002/gps.70028","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70028","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A modified e-Delphi was used to explore subject-expert consensus to create a minimum & gold standard assessment for young-onset dementia (YOD) for clinicians based in Australia.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A list of 72 statements adapted from an international study, O'Malley et al. 2020, was included in an online survey that was distributed to clinical experts in the field. Respondents were asked to rate statements on a Likert scale of 1–7 (ranging from ‘1’ being ‘not at all important’ to ‘7’ being ‘absolutely essential’). The mean and standard deviation (SD) were calculated for each statement. Full consensus, designated as ‘minimum standard’ was defined as 100% of respondents rating statement(s) as ‘absolutely essential’ (7) or ‘very important’ (6), while high consensus, designated as ‘gold standard’ was defined as 80% (16 out of 20) of respondents rating statement(s) as either ‘absolutely essential’ or ‘very important’ in the assessment for YOD. The statements that had overall mean scores below 6 did not reach consensus.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Full consensus was achieved on 13 statements (‘minimum standard’), 80% consensus was reached on 37 statements (‘gold standard’), and no consensus was reached on 35 statements. Most clinicians agreed that the diagnosis of YOD is largely based on history, with less emphasis placed on aspects of the examination and investigations conducted. History of first-degree family members with YOD and any past psychiatric symptoms were reported to be potential triggers for a YOD diagnosis. There was agreement that the routine dementia blood screen and baseline structural imaging should be a part of the diagnostic assessment criteria of YOD. Comparisons were made between the results of this Australian-based study to the original international study, which found that 55/72 statements (76%) were similarly rated.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Based on the results of this modified e-Delphi study, full and high consensus was reached on 37 statements which were comparable to results in an international study. This suggests that in general, clinicians in Australia have agreement with international experts about what is important for the assessment and diagnosis of YOD. Because the statements used in the international study were used in this Australian study, consideration of what issues may be specific to the Australian context such as YOD in Aboriginal Australians and rurality may have not been ascertained. In spite of this, these results may be useful to aid clinicians in their assessment for YOD but cons","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800684","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Dual Group-Based 11-Year Trajectory Analysis of Cognitive Impairment and Transport Restriction for Community-Dwelling Older Adults","authors":"Yong Yang, Yu Jiang, Ming Wen, Li Wang","doi":"10.1002/gps.70032","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To examine the trajectories of cognitive impairment and transport restriction over time and the interrelation between these trajectories among older adults.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Group-based trajectory modeling was used on the longitudinal National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) over 11 years from 2011 to 2021, among 5753 participants, stratified by age in 2011 to three groups of 65–74 years, 75–84 years, and 85 years and above.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>For transport restrictions, these trajectory groups were: (1) a majority with no restrictions, (2) low and increasing or stable, and (3) moderate or high and decreasing. The overall pattern was largely consistent across the three age groups, with the older group showing a higher predicted likelihood of transport restrictions compared to the younger group. For each of the three age groups, there were two cognitive impairment trajectories including (1) low and (2) increasing cognitive impairment. The proportions of increasing cognitive impairment were 12.3% among the 65–74 years old, 27.3% among the 75–84 years old, and 40.4% among the 85 years and above old. Compared with those with no transport restriction, the other two trajectories with either low or moderate transport restrictions were more likely to belong to increasing cognitive impairment. The odds ratio was 3.06 (95% CI 2.0–4.68) for low & increasing transport restrictions versus 1.57 (95% CI 0.96–2.56) for moderate & decreasing transport restrictions among 65–74 years old. The odds ratio was 2.38 (95% CI 1.68–3.38) for low & increasing transport restrictions versus 1.88 (95% CI 1.39–2.55) for moderate & decreasing transport restrictions among 75–84 years old.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Cognitive impairment was more likely to co-occur with those with low and increasing transport restrictions than with those with moderate and decreasing transport restrictions. Addressing transport restriction among older adults holds the potential to ameliorate cognitive outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142800682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Can the Short-Form UCLA Loneliness Scale Be Used to Measure Loneliness Among Chinese Older Adults? From Classical Test Theory to Rasch Analysis","authors":"Qing Zhong, Yuxing Jiang, Yeates Conwell, Shulin Chen","doi":"10.1002/gps.70017","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Loneliness among older adults, is a subjective experience and a public health issue in aging societies. Psychometrically sound and culturally sensitive measures are needed for developing precisely targeted interventions in culturally distinct groups. This study tested the Short-Form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) among Chinese older adults.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Method</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, and the correlation with the single question of loneliness were conducted with a sample of Chinese older adults. Rasch analyses assessed the unidimensionality, response category functioning, item difficulty, and targeting of the ULS-8 for older Chinese adults.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Data from 347 Chinese older adults (mean age 71.36 ± 9.51 years) were analyzed; 74.64% of the participants were female. The ULS-8 showed acceptable internal consistency and criterion validity in Classical Test Theory. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis indicated that the ULS-8 did not demonstrate a unidimensional structure. Additionally, Rasch analysis revealed (1) a misfit in item 3, indicating a problem with construct validity; (2) the need to combine response categories; and (3) that Chinese older adults are less likely to endorse a high level of loneliness when using the ULS-8.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>To ascertain the adequacy of the loneliness measure, it is crucial to customize a new short version of the loneliness scale for Chinese older adults through Rasch analysis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142794700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Salomón Salazar-Londoño, Cristina Silva-Buriticá, Laura Herrera-Velez, Diego Rosselli
{"title":"Using Routinely Collected Health Data to Estimate the Prevalence of Alzheimer's Disease and Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors in Colombia","authors":"Salomón Salazar-Londoño, Cristina Silva-Buriticá, Laura Herrera-Velez, Diego Rosselli","doi":"10.1002/gps.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objective</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>With an increasing prevalence, Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. However, a percentage of potentially modifiable cases have been reported. This article describes the prevalence of four of these potentially modifiable risk factors: hearing loss, diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and hypertension.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Descriptive cross-sectional study with data from 2018 to 2022, using the Colombian health system database SISPRO. The population of this study consisted of all people within the age range 50–100 with a main diagnosis of AD according to the ICD-10 codes. Subjects were divided by decades, and the prevalence ratio (PR) for the outcome of AD and each of its potentially modifiable risk factors was then calculated and adjusted by age using the Mantel-Haenszel formula.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>167,556 cases of AD were identified, with 66.4% being females. Peak age was in octogenarians, and the five-years period prevalence for people older than 50 was 12.6 cases/1000 people. The PRs showed a positive association for all risk factors, except obesity. Following age correction, obesity's PR value shifted to positive in males and overall population but remained negative for females. The highest post-correction PR in the overall population was hypertension (1.44), followed by DM (1.34), hearing loss (1.31) and obesity (1.12). Notably, PRs had a greater magnitude in younger and male age groups.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusion</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The results of this study are consistent with the fact that the prevalence of potentially modifiable risk factors is higher within the group of people with AD as their main diagnosis.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142791904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Addressing the Gaps in Assessing Dementia in Older Autistic Adults","authors":"Freddie O'Donald, Jamie Ferrie, Clara Calia","doi":"10.1002/gps.70031","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142791903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Profiling Social Detachment in Older People in Taiwan: A Cluster Analysis","authors":"Chao-Ying Tu, Chi-Shin Wu, Chia-Ming Yen, Hung-Yeh Chang, Chih-Yuan Yu, Kai-Chieh Chang, Hsin-Shui Chen, Chin-Kai Chang, Juey-Jen Hwang, Su-Hua Huang, Yung-Ming Chen, Bor-Wen Cheng, Min-Hsiu Weng, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Wei-Lieh Huang","doi":"10.1002/gps.70027","DOIUrl":"10.1002/gps.70027","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The Social Detachment Questionnaire for the Older Population (SDQO) is a validated tool that assesses various dimensions of social relationships. This study aimed to profile social detachment among older people in Taiwan using the SDQO and explore its use in distinguishing groups with varying levels of social engagement.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>A telephone-based survey was conducted, collecting demographic data and responses to the SDQO and Brief Symptom Rating Scale-5 (BSRS-5). Cluster analysis based on SDQO dimension scores was performed to identify groupings. Regression analyses examined the association between social engagement clusters, demographic variables, and BSRS-5 scores. A receiver operating characteristic curve was established and the area under the curve was calculated to identify the cutoff for distinguishing individuals with high and low social engagement.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>In a representative sample of 2549 individuals aged 55 and above in Taiwan, cluster analysis identified two groups based on social engagement levels as measured by the SDQO. The low social engagement cluster, indicating higher social detachment, was more likely to consist of older individuals (≥ 75 years), those without children, and those with lower education levels (≤ 9 years). After adjusting for demographics, the low social engagement cluster was associated with higher BSRS-5 scores. The optimal SDQO cutoff for identifying low social engagement was 27/28.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The SDQO can identify socially detached older people, who are more likely to experience increased psychological distress. Screening older individuals with demographic risk factors using the SDQO could help identify those most vulnerable to adverse health outcomes related to social detachment.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142780086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ioannis Liampas, Vasileios Siokas, Polyxeni Stamati, Panayiota Kyriakoulopoulou, Zisis Tsouris, Elli Zoupa, Vasiliki Folia, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Efthimios Dardiotis
{"title":"Neuropsychiatric Symptoms Associated With Frontotemporal Atrophy in Older Adults Without Dementia","authors":"Ioannis Liampas, Vasileios Siokas, Polyxeni Stamati, Panayiota Kyriakoulopoulou, Zisis Tsouris, Elli Zoupa, Vasiliki Folia, Constantine G. Lyketsos, Efthimios Dardiotis","doi":"10.1002/gps.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We investigated the association between neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) and frontotemporal atrophy (FTA) in older adults without dementia. We hypothesized that the odds of having NPS would be increased in the presence of FTA.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>NACC participants ≥ 50 years old with available data on FTA were considered for eligibility. Those with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and those who were cognitively unimpaired (CU) were separately analyzed. NPS were quantified on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Binary logistic regression models estimated the association (odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are provided) between FTA and having each of 11 NPS (psychotic symptoms were grouped together) in CU and MCI individuals.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Results</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>FTA data were available for 3165 participants with MCI and 4051 CU: 207 and 55 had FTA on structural MRI studies, respectively. In the MCI group, the presence of FTA was associated with higher odds of having elation [2.42(1.33–4.40), <i>p</i> = 0.004], aberrant motor behavior [2.43(1.61–3.69), <i>p</i> < 0.001], appetite disorders [2.15(1.52–3.04), <i>p</i> < 0.001], apathy [2.05(1.48–2.85), <i>p</i> < 0.001] and disinhibition [2.02(1.38–2.96), <i>p</i> < 0.001]. The odds of having specific NPS were not significantly elevated in CU individuals with FTA. Of note, the size and direction of the associations were indicative of a potential relationship between FTA and specific NPS (most notably elation, aberrant motor behavior, appetite disorders and anxiety); in light of the small number of CU individuals with FTA we believe this analysis was underpowered and obscured several true associations.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Conclusions</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>FTA was associated with higher odds of some NPS in older adults with MCI but not with normal cognition.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gps.70008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142762508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}