The Russian Sociological Review最新文献_第2页

Modernist Traditionalism against Modernity: Criticism of Progress in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th Century (the Case of Archbishop Nikanor [Brovkovich] and K. N. Leontiev) 反对现代性的现代主义传统主义:对19世纪下半叶俄国进步的批判(以尼科诺大主教[布罗夫科维奇]和K. N.列昂捷夫为例)

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2017-2-253-274

Artem Soloviev

{"title":"Modernist Traditionalism against Modernity: Criticism of Progress in Russia in the Second Half of the 19th Century (the Case of Archbishop Nikanor [Brovkovich] and K. N. Leontiev)","authors":"Artem Soloviev","doi":"10.17323/1728-192X-2017-2-253-274","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2017-2-253-274","url":null,"abstract":"Archbishop Nikanor (Brovkovich) (1826-1890), and Konstantin Nikolaevich Leontiev (1831-1891), whose ideas are often considered as identical, are representatives of the Russian conservatism of the second half of the XIX century. Their views can be attributed to the culture-critical direction of the traditionalist type which interprets modernization as a threat to the existence of both the natural habitat of man and man himself. These thinkers oppose progress, as they believe that modernization is homogenizing culture and destroying traditions. To identify the differences between the views of Archbishop Nicanor and Leontiev, it seems necessary to turn to the theory of “compensation” by I. Ritter, G. Lubbe, and O. Marquard. According to this theory, modernity produces ways of compensation of its own rational homogeneity. Among these ways of compensation, we can find the interest of irrational and unique phenomena, and of individual “stories of origin”. Thus, culture-criticism itself is revealed as a way of a compensation of the standardizing aspects of modernization. Thus, Leont’ev contrasts modernity with “Byzantium” as a traditional culture, while Archbishop Nikanor does so with the ideal of individual Orthodox holiness. This demonstrates the difference between them, despite the fact that their traditionalism turns out to be equally modern, performing the compensation. However, Leontiev was sketching out the ways of destroying modernity, linking it with the victory of socialism which he predicted within the political avant-garde, leading to a new feudalism. In contrast, Archbishop Nikanor considered progress as inevitable, offering to compensate for its negative consequences by maintaining the irrational and unique aspects of traditional religiosity.","PeriodicalId":137616,"journal":{"name":"The Russian Sociological Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121335305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Friendship as a Practice in Distinction (an Example of the Intellectual Milieu of Yekaterinburg) 友谊是一种与众不同的实践(以叶卡捷琳堡的知识分子环境为例)

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2017-3-66-86

E. Nemenko

引用次数: 0

Review: Tsaritsyno: attrakcion s istoriej [Tsaritsyno: An Attraction with History] (Moscow: Novoe literaturnoye obozrenie, 2014), Edited by Natalia Samutina and Boris Stepanov

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2014-2-201-205

A. Maximova

引用次数: 0

Emotions in Law and Politics: From Aristotle to the Present-Day Jurisprudence 法律与政治中的情感:从亚里士多德到现代法理学

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2018-2-356-362

I. Borshch

引用次数: 0

The objective perspective 客观视角

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9780203298763-8

B. Werlen

引用次数: 1

Social Order and Art Sources of Imaginations 社会秩序与想象的艺术源泉

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2020-4-7-13

Alexander F. Filippov, Nail Farkhatdinov

引用次数: 0

The Debats on Post-Socialism and the Politics of Knowledge in the Space of the Plural “Post’s” 复数“后”空间中的后社会主义与知识政治之争

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-44-69

A. Ousmanova

{"title":"The Debats on Post-Socialism and the Politics of Knowledge in the Space of the Plural “Post’s”","authors":"A. Ousmanova","doi":"10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-44-69","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-44-69","url":null,"abstract":"In this article I focus on how the politics of knowledge, have being shaped in a world without socialism, can be also considered as a space of multiple “post’s”. Social researchers from the post-socialist region strive to return their countries onto the map and to identify their place in history, while applying different conceptual approaches based on different ideological premises. Meanwhile, all of these theoretical frameworks are not neutral in their relation to hegemonic discourses. Here I address the methodological nationalism, gender studies, and de-colonial discourse as the examples of “engaged knowledge”, while considering them as the most influential interpretative models among those that have become established in the post-socialist space after 1991, on the ruins of orthodox Marxism. What interests me most of all is the epistemological and political effects that they produce when they are applied to the analysis of the post-“post-socialist condition”. I argue that, depending on the interpretative optics, we might get quite different answers to such questions as whether the time has come to say “Goodbye, post-socialism!”, or to which extent the “Global East” can be considered as a useful category of analysis in the given circumstances. What I understand here by the ‘space of multiple “post’s”, is, firstly, a territory that, after the collapse of socialism, was inscribed into a new spatial constellation, but still continues to search for its place on the geopolitical map of the world and remains very sensitive to the politics of naming; secondly, I invoke it as a space of epistemological heteroglossia, that is, the one in which various ways of conceptualizing both the recent past and the actual present continue to compete with each other.","PeriodicalId":137616,"journal":{"name":"The Russian Sociological Review","volume":"285 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116172181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Dreams of the Russian Revolution in the Utopias of Alexander Chayanov and Andrei Platonov 亚历山大·查亚诺夫和安德烈·普拉托诺夫乌托邦中的俄国革命之梦

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2018-3-256-290

A. Nikulin

{"title":"Dreams of the Russian Revolution in the Utopias of Alexander Chayanov and Andrei Platonov","authors":"A. Nikulin","doi":"10.17323/1728-192X-2018-3-256-290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2018-3-256-290","url":null,"abstract":"The Russian Revolution is the central theme of both A. Chayanov’s novel The Journey of My Brother Alexei to the Land of Peasant Utopia and A. Platonov’s novel Chevengur. The author of this article compares the chronicles and images of the Revolution in the biographies of Chayanov and Platonov as well as the main characters, genres, plots, and structures of the two utopian novels, and questions the very understanding of the history of the Russian Revolution and the possible alternatives of its development. The article focuses not only on the social-economic structure of utopian Moscow and Chevengur but also on the ethical-aesthetic foundations of both utopias. The author argues that the two utopias reconstruct, describe, and criticize the Revolution from different perspectives and positions. In general, Chayanov adheres to a relativistic and pluralistic perception of the Revolution and history, while Platonov, on the contrary, absolutizes the end of humankind history with the eschatological advent of Communism. In Chayanov‘s utopia, the Russian Revolution is presented as a viable alternative to the humanistic-progressive ideals of the metropolitan elites with the moderate populist-socialist ideas of the February Revolution. In Platonov’s utopia, the Revolution is presented as an alternative to the eschatological-ecological transformation of the world by provincial rebels inspired by the October Revolution. Thus, Chayanov’s liberal-cooperative utopia and Platonov’s anarchist-communist utopia contain both an apologia and a criticism of the Russian Revolution in the insights of its past and future victories and defeats, and opens new horizons for alternative interpretations of the Russian Revolution.","PeriodicalId":137616,"journal":{"name":"The Russian Sociological Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122343495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Who Uses the Moral Panic Concept? A Bibliometric Analysis of Moral Panic Scientific Literature 谁在使用道德恐慌的概念?道德恐慌科学文献计量学分析

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-351-375

Oxana R. Mikhaylova

{"title":"Who Uses the Moral Panic Concept? A Bibliometric Analysis of Moral Panic Scientific Literature","authors":"Oxana R. Mikhaylova","doi":"10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-351-375","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2020-3-351-375","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the bibliometric approach was used for the investigation of the research field\u0000organized around the concept of moral panic. To examine the current condition of the moral panic field, we analyzed the papers published in the WoS from 1972–2019. As a result of our study, the thematic areas, and the most influential actors in the field were revealed and described. Today, the moral panic filed is dominated by sociologists. Among the leaders in terms of citations are authors from financially-developed countries. This shows that there is economic inequality in the production of papers. The most cited are publications devoted to online studies. The results of this research demonstrate that there is no noticeable erosion among the empirical contexts, where the concept is used because children and youth are still the most popular object of moral panic studies. They are the classical objects for moral panic papers. At the same time, it could be argued that this field is still in the process of development because the theoretical and empirical papers that prevail are connected with the integration of the moral panic theory with other theories and concepts. We suppose this approach to the conceptual analysis developed in this paper could be useful for the revision of other fields developed around controversial concepts in sociology.","PeriodicalId":137616,"journal":{"name":"The Russian Sociological Review","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123017577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Anatoly Vishnevsky — Scholar, Creator, Man of Settled Convictions 阿纳托利·维什涅夫斯基-学者，创造者，坚定信念的人

The Russian Sociological Review Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.17323/1728-192X-2021-3-323-333

A. Blum

引用次数: 0