ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
EPIDEMIOLOGICALRISK FACTORS OF RECURRENCE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION AFTER PRIMARY DISCECTOMY (LITERATURE REVIEW) 腰椎间盘突出症初次椎间盘切除术后复发的流行病学风险因素(文献综述)
ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI: 10.15674/0030-598720234128-132
Volodymyr Radchenko, Valentyn Piontkovskyi, Vira Kolesnichenko, Maksym Golbaum, Olexandr Chernyshov, Oleksandr Palkin
{"title":"EPIDEMIOLOGICALRISK FACTORS OF RECURRENCE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC HERNIATION AFTER PRIMARY DISCECTOMY (LITERATURE REVIEW)","authors":"Volodymyr Radchenko, Valentyn Piontkovskyi, Vira Kolesnichenko, Maksym Golbaum, Olexandr Chernyshov, Oleksandr Palkin","doi":"10.15674/0030-598720234128-132","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-598720234128-132","url":null,"abstract":"Primary discectomy for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniated (LDH) is usually accompanied by a rapid regression of clinical symptoms, however, in 5–15 % of cases, an X-ray positive recurrence of the hernia with corresponding orthopedic disorders is registered, which leads to repeated surgical intervention. Objective. Determination of risk factors for recurrence of LDH and their frequency under the conditions of various methods of primary discectomy based on a scientific analysis of the relevant literature. Methods. The material of the research is articles containing the definition of risk factors for the recurrence of a LDH after primary discectomy, for the period 2013–2023 in PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline databases using medical subject headings and keywords «recurrent lumbar disc herniation, surgical interventions, percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy, microdiscectomy, laminectomy, discectomy, spondylodesis». The research method is a systematic review of relevant literature sources. Results. Early and long-term results of primary discectomy for intervertebral disc herniation using decompression (open discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, percutaneous discectomy, laminectomy, minidiscectomy, endoscopic discectomy) and decompression-stabilization (discectomy combined with spondylodesis) techniques are traced in the literature. The most successful were: 1 year after the operation — endoscopic discectomy (12.4 % of reoperations) and spondylodesis (11.8 %); 10 years after the operation — laminectomy (14 %) and spondylodesis (10 %). The highest rates of revision discectomy: 1 year after the operation — laminectomy (18.6 %); 10 years after surgery — open discectomy and endoscopic discectomy — 16 % each. Conclusions. Recurrent intervertebral disc herniation is an early complication of primary discectomy, the frequency of which varies depending on the surgical technique and the timing of the postoperative period. The most reliable risk factors are male gender, age younger than 50 years, diabetes mellitus, and smoking.","PeriodicalId":137495,"journal":{"name":"ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS","volume":"51 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139527632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PUNCTURE LASER MICRODISCECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF SEQUESTERED HERNIATION OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS 穿刺激光显微椎间盘切除术在治疗腰椎间盘突出症中的应用
ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI: 10.15674/0030-59872023431-35
M. Zorin
{"title":"PUNCTURE LASER MICRODISCECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF SEQUESTERED HERNIATION OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISCS","authors":"M. Zorin","doi":"10.15674/0030-59872023431-35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15674/0030-59872023431-35","url":null,"abstract":"Objective. to improve the results of treatment of sequestered herniation of lumbar intervertebral discs by the puncture laser microdiscectomy (PLM) method. Methods. During the period from 2000 to 2023, 132 patients with sequestered lumbar disc herniations were operated on by the PLM method. There were 88 males and 34 females. The age of the patients was from 23 to 64 (42.3 ± 3.5) years. Surgeries were performed using a C-arc operating fluoroscope. The laser pulse duration — 0.3–0.5 sec, and radiation exposure — 500–600 J. Approach to the sequestrum was mainly posteromedian transdural. For laterally located sequestra, posterolateral approach was used. The efficacy of PLM was assessed by pain intensity reduction according to the VAS scale one month after surgery, and according to the McNab scale 3 months after surgery. Results. One month after PLM, the maximum reduction of radicular pain intensity was noted in patients with posteromedian hernias, to a lesser extent — with paramedian hernias, and the least pronounced — with lateral hernias. However, no statistically significant differences in pain intensity one month after surgery depending on hernia location were found (p > 0.05). As for the intensity of lumbar pain, in all groups, regardless of hernia location, it significantly decreased and did not exceed 1 point after one month. 3 months after surgery, 95 (71.9 %) patients had an excellent result according to the McNab scale, 13 (9.8 %) — good, 7 (5.3 %) — satisfactory, 17 (12.8 %) — unsatisfactory, indicating that the PLM method of sequestered hernias can be quite effective in a certain selection of patients. According to our  data, positive results can reach 81.8 % (95 % CI 74.2–87.9 %) (CI — confidence interval). Conclusions Sequestered hernias, which can be operated by the PLM method, should not exceed 9 mm in height on axial sections, should have a smooth rounded lenticular shape without signs of migration. The positive effect of PLM of sequestered hernias reached 81.7 %. The results were better with PLM of posteromedian hernias.","PeriodicalId":137495,"journal":{"name":"ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY and PROSTHETICS","volume":"43 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139528206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信