2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)最新文献

Standardization in the ict: towards ever closer union between SSOs and patent offices? 信息通信技术的标准化:sso和专利局之间更紧密的联盟?

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535601

Olga P. Kokoulina

引用次数: 0

IEEE's Humanitarian Open Source IEEE的人道主义开源

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535596

A. Herrera, T. Prowse

引用次数: 1

The evolving role of standardisation in technological innovation: the case of photovoltaics 标准化在技术创新中的演变作用:以光伏为例

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535597

J. Ho, E. O’Sullivan

引用次数: 7

Analysis of early-stage proposals in standardization 标准化前期建议分析

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535347

Toru Yamada, M. Serizawa

{"title":"Analysis of early-stage proposals in standardization","authors":"Toru Yamada, M. Serizawa","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535347","url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents analysis results of earlystage proposals in standardization so as to consider companies' effort toward obtaining standard-essential patents (SEPs). The number of the SEPs has greatly increased in the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) field. Some companies in the ICT field strategically aim to obtain SEPs. It is important for such companies to file patents timely and to propose their technologies covered by the patents to standardization bodies from the early stage of the standardization process. oneM2M Release 1, a standard for Machine to Machine (M2M), is investigated in this study. First, proponents of each item in the functional-requirement specification discussed in the early stage are analyzed in order to know technical areas in which major companies are interested. Then, the relationship between the interesting areas (the early-stage proposals) of the major companies and their patents is investigated. The investigation results show that the early-stage proposals by vendors (manufacturers) are highly overlapped with their patents. It can be said that the vendors are strategically proposing from early stages in order to get SEPs. On the other hand, less overlap is observed in nonpracticing entities (NPEs) and mobile operators. Since NPEs filed patents in a wide range of the technical fields, it is likely to have intention to obtain SEPs by employing other companies' proposals. The mobile operators have the relatively large number of proposals as compared with the number of filed patents. It can be said that they consider that it is important to make the M2M market larger rather than to make benefit from SEPs. From the observation above, one can conclude that the companies in different business categories have different strategies in the standardization from the viewpoint of obtaining SEPs.","PeriodicalId":137385,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127581922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Perilous deviations from FRAND harmony- operational pitfalls of the 2015 IEEE patent policy 从FRAND和谐的危险偏差- 2015年IEEE专利政策的操作陷阱

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535599

R. D. Katznelson

{"title":"Perilous deviations from FRAND harmony- operational pitfalls of the 2015 IEEE patent policy","authors":"R. D. Katznelson","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535599","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535599","url":null,"abstract":"Standard Development Organizations (SDOs) have one thing in common: they uniformly refrain from formally defining the meaning of \"Fair, Reasonable and Non- Discriminatory\" (FRAND) licensing terms required for patents essential to implement technical standards, called standardessential patents (SEPs). This uniformity in non-definition is called FRAND Harmony. However, in a bitterly contested and controversial move, the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) amended its patent policy, effective March 15, 2015, to become the only major SDO to substantively define FRAND licensing terms, a definition at great variance with other SDOs' practice and a substantial deviation from IEEE's traditional neutrality on FRAND terms. IEEE's new departure from de facto industry standard licensing practice will put parties into irreconcilable legal positions: SEP licenses for new standards may not simultaneously conform to the new FRAND terms mandated by the 2015 IEEE patent policy, and to legacy FRAND terms in the old licenses that necessarily follows legacy technology. This will undermine dynamic efficiencies in innovation where new standards incorporate other legacy standards by reference as \"normative,\" and where standard amendments are rolled-up into new revisions of the standard. Under this new patent policy, IEEE Societies will be handicapped in developing new standards that build on legacy standards. IEEE's deviation from FRAND Harmony has the additional potential of inducing a practice that would discriminate among SEP holders in adopting technologies in IEEE standards. Many top quality and complex standards projects may grind to a halt unless IEEE-SA reverses course, as another SDO did two decades ago when their similar experiment with FRAND disharmony failed.","PeriodicalId":137385,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124233682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Private standards as means of technology transfer 私有标准作为技术转让的手段

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535603

A. Mangelsdorf

引用次数: 0

Diversity in standards development: A response to Katznelson 标准发展的多样性:对卡兹尼尔森的回应

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535600

Gilad Y. Ohana

{"title":"Diversity in standards development: A response to Katznelson","authors":"Gilad Y. Ohana","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535600","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535600","url":null,"abstract":"In his article Perilous Deviations From FRAND Harmony-Operational Pitfalls of the 2015 IEEE Patent Policy, Ron Katznelson discusses the development of the 2015 updates to the patent policy contained in the IEEE Standards Association By-Laws, and predicts \"Operational pitfalls\" involving supposed difficulties involving incorporation by reference of IEEE-SA standards created under the updated policy. In my response, I provide a different perspective on what led IEEE-SA to adopt the updated patent policy. Specifically, I discuss how the policy updates respond to concerns that innovative companies involved in standards development at IEEE-SA and elsewhere have based on their real-world experiences in licensing patents claimed to be essential to implement standards such as Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) and Ethernet (IEEE 802.3). I also explain why Mr. Katznelson's prediction that the updated By-Laws will cause other standards development organizations to decline to incorporate IEEE-SA standards by reference are imaginary and inconsistent with widespread incorporation by reference that happens today between standards created under RAND models and standards created under royalty-free models. Finally, I show that Mr. Katznelson's concerns with the IEEE-SA's updates reflect a discomfort with the idea that standards development organizations should be free to experiment with diverse models for access by implementers of standards to patented inventions essential to implement standards and made available for license by participants in standards development. Far from being something that we should fear, experimentation and diversity with different patent licensing models, like diversity in other aspects of standards development, benefit participants in standards development, implementers of standards, and consumers that purchase products that implement standards.","PeriodicalId":137385,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126812378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Internet of Things and Business Models 物联网与商业模式

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535598

Pelle Hognelid, Thomas Kalling

引用次数: 17

Engagement in ICT standardization: Pushing the patents or questing for knowledge? 参与ICT标准化:推动专利还是追求知识?

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535604

C. Riillo, Ivana Mijatović

引用次数: 1

Government intervention in technology innovation system in the catching-up context: Case of TD-LTE technology innovation in China 追赶背景下政府对技术创新体系的干预——以中国TD-LTE技术创新为例

2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) Pub Date : 2015-10-01 DOI: 10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535602

Guanyu Liu, P. Gao

{"title":"Government intervention in technology innovation system in the catching-up context: Case of TD-LTE technology innovation in China","authors":"Guanyu Liu, P. Gao","doi":"10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIIT.2015.7535602","url":null,"abstract":"China is witnessed to catch up in the field of information technology (IT) through years of technology innovation. Scholars have indicated the significance of the government promotion and efficient technology innovation systems (TIS). Innovation literature about how TIS can be functioned and efficient with government intervention is still insufficient, especially that in catching-up context. This work aims to understand mechanism of government intervention in TIS for achieving technology innovation. Combining TIS frame with institutional perspective, a framework is developed. Underlying with the framework, case of TD-LTE innovation in China is examined based on extensive documentary research and semi-structured interviews. Within catching-up context, this paper argues that government is required to exert institutional forces on key components of TIS in different stages to achieve different tasks, both influential and regulative, for innovation purpose. These institutional measures work with a time sequence and the environment of technology innovation is also significant.","PeriodicalId":137385,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131566254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2