British Journal of Surgery最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Application of the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique in conversion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. 联合肝分区门静脉结扎分期肝切除术(ALPPS)技术在肝癌转化治疗中的应用。
IF 8.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf067
Jingyun Ning, Cao Dai, Qin Liu, Haoming Lin, Rui Zhang
{"title":"Application of the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) technique in conversion therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Jingyun Ning, Cao Dai, Qin Liu, Haoming Lin, Rui Zhang","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf067","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143951629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for gastrointestinal recovery after surgery (PRO-diGI). 患者报告的术后胃肠道恢复结果测量(PRO-diGI)的发展。
IF 9.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf055
Matthew J Lee,Daniel M Baker,Debby Hawkins,Sue Blackwell,Robert Arnott,Deena Harji,Gabrielle Thorpe,Stephen J Chapman,Georgina L Jones,
{"title":"Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for gastrointestinal recovery after surgery (PRO-diGI).","authors":"Matthew J Lee,Daniel M Baker,Debby Hawkins,Sue Blackwell,Robert Arnott,Deena Harji,Gabrielle Thorpe,Stephen J Chapman,Georgina L Jones,","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf055","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDAfter major abdominal surgery, patients may experience significant gastrointestinal dysfunction, including postoperative ileus. Many clinical tools are used to measure this dysfunction, but there is no patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) specific to this group. The aim of this study was to develop a new PROM for this common condition.METHODSA four-stage approach was undertaken. Stage 1 used semi-structured interviews with 29 patients to explore experiences of gastrointestinal recovery and develop a draft questionnaire. Stage 2 solicited feedback from 18 patients and 15 clinical experts on the face validity of the proposed tool using the Questionnaire on Questionnaires (QQ-10). Stage 3 recruited 297 patients to complete the questionnaire. Principal component analysis reduced the items and identified the domain structure. Test-retest reliability and a pilot assessment of responsiveness were assessed in stage 4 in a sample of 100 patients and in a sample of 68 patients respectively.RESULTSThe interviews generated 26 subthemes across gastrointestinal recovery and general well-being. An initial questionnaire containing 44 items was developed. The QQ-10 demonstrated high value and low burden, supporting face validity. Tests to reduce the items and identify the domain structure resulted in a 15-item questionnaire across four domains (nausea, eating, well-being, and bowels). Test-retest reliability showed intraclass correlation coefficient values ≥0.7 for all domains. Pilot responsiveness was demonstrated through differences in pre- and post-surgical scores.CONCLUSIONPRO-diGI is a PROM for gastrointestinal dysfunction after major abdominal surgery that shows good psychometric properties and demonstrates face validity, reliability, and responsiveness. This now needs external validation to facilitate broader implementation.","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143819369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Robotic intersphincteric resection with en-bloc prostatectomy for rectal cancer invading the prostate. 机器人括约肌间切除术联合整体前列腺切除术治疗侵犯前列腺的直肠癌。
IF 9.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf064
Kenji Kawada,Ryo Iguchi,Hiroya Matsuoka,Yukio Inamura,Mitsuru Yokota,Kazuyuki Kawamoto
{"title":"Robotic intersphincteric resection with en-bloc prostatectomy for rectal cancer invading the prostate.","authors":"Kenji Kawada,Ryo Iguchi,Hiroya Matsuoka,Yukio Inamura,Mitsuru Yokota,Kazuyuki Kawamoto","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf064","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf064","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"101 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The future of liver surgery-why it should be minimally invasive. 肝脏手术的未来——为什么它应该是微创的。
IF 9.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf053
Ismaël Chaoui,Mathieu D'Hondt
{"title":"The future of liver surgery-why it should be minimally invasive.","authors":"Ismaël Chaoui,Mathieu D'Hondt","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf053","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The future of liver surgery-open access should still be the front runner. 肝脏手术的未来——开放手术仍将是领跑者。
IF 9.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf046
Guido Torzilli
{"title":"The future of liver surgery-open access should still be the front runner.","authors":"Guido Torzilli","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf046","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143822569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Symmetrization in therapeutic mammoplasty for breast cancer: si non nunc quandro. 对称在乳腺癌乳房成形术治疗中的应用:si nonununquandro。
IF 8.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf060
Daniel R Leff, Paul T R Thiruchelvam
{"title":"Symmetrization in therapeutic mammoplasty for breast cancer: si non nunc quandro.","authors":"Daniel R Leff, Paul T R Thiruchelvam","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf060","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjs/znaf060","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962930/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143762686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to: Role of Lugol solution before total thyroidectomy for Graves' disease: randomized clinical trial. 更正:甲状腺全切除术前卢戈溶液对Graves病的作用:随机临床试验。
IF 8.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf073
{"title":"Correction to: Role of Lugol solution before total thyroidectomy for Graves' disease: randomized clinical trial.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf073","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf073","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12036522/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143955766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Oesophagectomy in the East versus the West: comparison of two national audit databases. 食管切除术在东方与西方:两个国家审计数据库的比较。
IF 8.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf035
Satoru Matsuda, Pieter van der Sluis, Hiraku Kumamaru, Feike Kingma, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Jelle Ruurda, Masayuki Watanabe, Hiroaki Miyata, Sjoerd Lagarde, Hiroya Takeuchi, Richard van Hillegersberg, Ken Shirabe, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Yuko Kitagawa
{"title":"Oesophagectomy in the East versus the West: comparison of two national audit databases.","authors":"Satoru Matsuda, Pieter van der Sluis, Hiraku Kumamaru, Feike Kingma, Hirofumi Kawakubo, Jelle Ruurda, Masayuki Watanabe, Hiroaki Miyata, Sjoerd Lagarde, Hiroya Takeuchi, Richard van Hillegersberg, Ken Shirabe, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Yuko Kitagawa","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znaf035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015469/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143959600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of postoperative complications on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer: multicentre study. 胃癌胃切除术后并发症对临床结果的影响:多中心研究。
IF 8.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf043
Sander J M van Hootegem, Margrietha van der Linde, Marcel A Schneider, Jeesun Kim, Felix Berlth, Yutaka Sugita, Peter P Grimminger, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Giovanni De Manzoni, Maria Bencivenga, Suzanne Gisbertz, Souya Nunobe, Han-Kwang Yang, Christian A Gutschow, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Hester F Lingsma, Bas P L Wijnhoven
{"title":"Impact of postoperative complications on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy for cancer: multicentre study.","authors":"Sander J M van Hootegem, Margrietha van der Linde, Marcel A Schneider, Jeesun Kim, Felix Berlth, Yutaka Sugita, Peter P Grimminger, Gian Luca Baiocchi, Giovanni De Manzoni, Maria Bencivenga, Suzanne Gisbertz, Souya Nunobe, Han-Kwang Yang, Christian A Gutschow, Sjoerd M Lagarde, Hester F Lingsma, Bas P L Wijnhoven","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf043","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjs/znaf043","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To reduce the clinical and economic burden of complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer, specific complications should be targeted to effectively allocate healthcare resources for quality improvement and preventive measures. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of complications on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective multicentre study of patients who underwent (sub)total gastrectomy for gastric or junctional adenocarcinoma at 43 centres in 16 countries between 2017 and 2021. Outcomes were escalation of care, reoperation, prolonged hospital stay (greater than the 75th percentile), readmission, and 30-day mortality. Adjusted relative risks and population attributable fractions were estimated for specific complication-outcome pairs. The population attributable fraction represents the percentage reduction in the frequency of an adverse outcome if a complication could be completely prevented in the population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 7829 patients were included. Postoperative complications occurred in 1884 patients (24.1%). The most frequent complications were pulmonary complications (436 patients (5.6%)), anastomotic leakage (363 patients (4.6%)), and abdominal collection (301 patients (3.8%)). Anastomotic leakage, cardiac complications, and pulmonary complications had the greatest impact on 30-day mortality (population attributable fraction 26.6% (95% c.i. 14.5% to 38.6%), 18.7% (95% c.i. 9.4% to 28.0%), and 15.6% (95% c.i. 12.0% to 30.0%) respectively). Anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications had the greatest impact on escalation of care (population attributable fraction 26.3% (95% c.i. 20.6% to 32.0%) and 18.4% (95% c.i. 11.7% to 25.2%) respectively), whereas anastomotic leakage and intra-abdominal bleeding had the greatest impact on reoperation (population attributable fraction 31.6% (95% c.i. 26.4% to 36.9%) and 8.5% (95% c.i. 5.5% to 11.5%) respectively). Most of the studied complications contributed to a prolonged hospital stay, whereas the contribution of complications to readmission did not exceed 15.9%. Subgroup analysis showed regional variation in the impact of complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anastomotic leakage had the largest overall negative impact on clinical outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and pulmonary complications would have the most impact on the burden of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953074/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Inflammatory response and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: randomized clinical trial (ROLAIS). 腹腔镜与机器人经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后的炎症反应和短期结果:随机临床试验(ROLAIS)。
IF 8.6 1区 医学
British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaf074
Alexandros Valorenzos, Kristian A Nielsen, Karsten Kaiser, Sofie R Petersen, Per Helligsø, Allan Dorfelt, Kate L Lambertsen, Mark B Ellebæk, Michael F Nielsen
{"title":"Inflammatory response and short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: randomized clinical trial (ROLAIS).","authors":"Alexandros Valorenzos, Kristian A Nielsen, Karsten Kaiser, Sofie R Petersen, Per Helligsø, Allan Dorfelt, Kate L Lambertsen, Mark B Ellebæk, Michael F Nielsen","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znaf074","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjs/znaf074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (L-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair with respect to surgical stress response and short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, open-label, RCT enrolled patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to R-TAPP or L-TAPP using a computer-generated sequence with block sizes of six. All procedures were performed by the same experienced surgeons. The primary outcome was plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Secondary outcomes included interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels, operating time, complications, length of stay, and readmission rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 patients (R-TAPP, 76; and L-TAPP, 74) were randomized, with 11 withdrawing before surgery, leaving 139 (R-TAPP, 74; and L-TAPP, 65) for intention-to-treat analysis. CRP levels were significantly lower after R-TAPP on postoperative days 1 and 3 (reductions of 23% and 32% respectively, P = 0.001). IL-6 levels were also lower after R-TAPP at 30 and 120 min after extubation (reductions of 26% and 22% respectively, P < 0.001). R-TAPP was associated with a shorter operating time (-13.4 min, P < 0.001), fewer complications (23.0% versus 41.5%, P = 0.029), including fewer haematomas (6.8% versus 18.5%, P = 0.043), and a higher same-day discharge rate (95.9% versus 81.5%, P = 0.012). No significant differences were observed regarding chronic pain and recurrence rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>R-TAPP was associated with reduced surgical stress, complications, operating time, and hospitalization compared with L-TAPP. These findings support further multicentre trials to assess long-term outcomes and generalizability.</p><p><strong>Registration number: </strong>NCT05839587 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143955988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信