Pace Environmental Law Review最新文献_第7页

Dying to Be Fresh and Clean? Toxicants in Personal Care Products, the Impact on Cancer Risk, and Epigenetic Damage 渴望清新干净?个人护理产品中的毒物，对癌症风险的影响，以及表观遗传损伤

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2018-07-16 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1811

K. Drabiak

引用次数: 1

Friends or Foes? The Problem of South Florida’s Invasive Mangroves 朋友还是敌人?南佛罗里达州红树林入侵的问题

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-06-05 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1808

Kelly Cox, R. Araújo

{"title":"Friends or Foes? The Problem of South Florida’s Invasive Mangroves","authors":"Kelly Cox, R. Araújo","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1808","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1808","url":null,"abstract":"I the 1940s, renowned American botanist David Fairchild planted two specimens of the common Asian mangrove Bruguiera gymnorrhyza at his home in Miami (today a botanical garden known as The Kampong). Approximately 30 years later, at Fairchild Tropical Botanical Garden, horticulturists planted a second exotic species of mangrove from Asia, Lumnitzera racemosa. F decades both species remained contained to their respective locations. However, both species “escaped” and have since naturalized and spread. T aquarium trade, a popular activity in Florida, is also a cause for concern. Many species of mangroves can be procured online to decorate tanks to look like natural shorelines. The Problem Our Proposal U remains as to the complete success of the eradication efforts. An essential part of an effective precautionary approach to management of invasive mangrove species requires integration of such an approach into the legal framework. L racemosa and Bruguiera gymnorrhiza should be listed on the Florida Noxious Weed List. The Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act should be referenced as the authority by which state and local agencies can engage in eradication and management strategies for these species. Finally, a Florida Invasive Species Council should be established in order to promote horizontal and vertical integration between different levels and areas of government. This council should facilitate invasive species policy in the state by commissioning scientific studies, adopting risk assessment techniques to prioritize eradication, overseeing thoughtful and impactful use of funding, and assisting with planning strategies and management techniques.","PeriodicalId":136205,"journal":{"name":"Pace Environmental Law Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131288346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Public Resource Ownership and Community Engagement in a Modern Energy Landscape 现代能源格局中的公共资源所有权和社区参与

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-06-05 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1806

Samantha Hepburn

{"title":"Public Resource Ownership and Community Engagement in a Modern Energy Landscape","authors":"Samantha Hepburn","doi":"10.58948/0738-6206.1806","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1806","url":null,"abstract":"The onshore resource conflicts that have erupted in the Eastern states of Australia highlight the deep need for axiomatic structural change in public resource ownership frameworks. Much of the conflict that has arisen stems from the failure of the state, as owner, to give proper regard to the social and environmental concerns relevant to the expansion of onshore resource development. The underlying rationale for vesting resources in the state is to ensure they are managed for the benefit of the community as a whole. The implied assumption is that public benefit obligations are met through state administration because this is the most effective means of reinjecting the financial gains of resource exploitation back into the community. This article argues that the dramatic social and environmental impacts associated with a transitioning onshore resource sector have fundamentally altered this perspective. In this environment, the public interest obligations of the state transcend efficiency imperatives. In a modern public resource framework the state can only properly comply with its core public interest obligations where the social and environmental concerns of impacted communities regarding onshore resource development are effectively managed. This structural realignment coheres with the emergence of a more attuned and environmentally engaged communitarian network. This article draws upon social obligation jurisprudence, including land ethics, the public trust doctrine and the doctrine of propriety, to argue that the public ownership of resources has always been qualified by strong communitarian obligations. Responding to these obligations in a timely and effective manner is has, in the context of onshore resource expansion, become a public interest imperative. This is apparent not only from the growing formal importance of social licencing protocols in resource development projects but also, at a more fundamental level, in the normative drive towards ecological progression and improved structural consistency between human and natural law.","PeriodicalId":136205,"journal":{"name":"Pace Environmental Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128544895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Let’s Be Reasonable: Why Neither Nollan/Dolan nor Penn Central Should Govern Generally-Applied Legislative Exactions After Koontz 让我们保持理性:为什么诺兰/多兰和宾夕法尼亚中央大学都不应该在昆茨之后管理普遍适用的立法征收

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-06-05 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1803

Glen A. Hansen

引用次数: 1

Public Conservation Policies on Private Land: A Case Study of the Brazilian Forest Code and Implications for the Agro-Industry Sector 私人土地上的公共保护政策:巴西林业法的案例研究及其对农用工业部门的影响

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-06-05 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1805

R. Aguiar, Jody M. Endres, Caroline M. Taylor, S. Evans

引用次数: 1

Preventing a Risk/Risk Trade-off: An Analysis of the Measures Necessary to Increase U.S. Pollinator Numbers 预防风险/风险权衡:增加美国传粉媒介数量的必要措施分析

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-06-05 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1809

Camila Acchiardo Vallejo

引用次数: 0

Labor Leading on Climate: A Policy Platform to Address Rising Inequality and Rising Sea Levels in New York State 劳工在气候问题上的领导:解决纽约州日益加剧的不平等和海平面上升的政策平台

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-06-05 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1807

J. Cha

引用次数: 1

Choosing Your Ground on the Endangered Species Act: How Do the Ninth, Tenth, and District of Columbia Circuit Courts of Appeal Evaluate Water Management Decisions Made by Federal Water Agencies? 在濒危物种法案上选择你的立场:第九、第十和哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院如何评估联邦水务机构做出的水管理决定?

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-04-19 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1800

M. Kinsey

引用次数: 0

Migratory Waterbird Conservation at the Flyway Level: Distilling the Added Value of AEWA in Relation to the Ramsar Convention 迁徙水鸟在飞道层面的保育:提炼与拉姆萨尔公约有关的AEWA的附加价值

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-04-19 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1798

M. Lewis

引用次数: 0

What’s Shakin’? Ladra v. New Dominion, LLC: A Case of Consequence for the Hydraulic Fracturing Industry and Those Affected by Induced Seismicity 摇晃着的是什么?Ladra诉New Dominion, LLC:一个对水力压裂行业和受诱发地震活动影响者的后果的案例

Pace Environmental Law Review Pub Date : 2017-04-19 DOI: 10.58948/0738-6206.1802

James Logan

引用次数: 0