{"title":"COMPULSORY CHILDHOOD VACCINATION: THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE","authors":"L. Bakošová","doi":"10.33542/sic2021-2-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2021-2-01","url":null,"abstract":"Vaccination of children is of particular importance not only for their parents, but also for Governments in upholding their obligations under international human rights instruments, such as the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights or the Convention on the Rights of the Child. In the last years, however, the amount of children vaccinated against life-threatening diseases is declining. One of the most frequent arguments against vaccination (especially in case of compulsory vaccination) is the interference with the right to private and family life and the freedom of thought, conscience and religion. The aim of this paper is to analyse the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic and to highlight its relevance to Slovakia and international human rights law.","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"105 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127525404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"VYBRANÉ ASPEKTY ZAČATIA KONANIA O VYVLASTNENÍ","authors":"Lukáš Tomáš","doi":"10.33542/sic2019-2-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2019-2-07","url":null,"abstract":"Predmetom predkladaného článku je analýza vybraných aspektov začatia konania o vyvlastnení, ktoré je nevyhnutným predpokladom realizácie rozhodovacích postupov podľa zákona č. 282/2015 Z. z. o vyvlastňovaní pozemkov a stavieb a o nútenom obmedzení vlastníckeho práva k nim a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení zákona č. 177/2018 Z. z. Autor sa v článku zameriava najmä na všeobecnú charakteristiku spôsobu začatia konania o vyvlastnení a analyzuje niektoré aspekty náležitostí návrhu na začatie konania o vyvlastnení a zásad konania o vyvlastnení. Článok v relevantných súvislostiach reflektuje na aplikačnú prax, prináša komparáciu s minulou právnou úpravou a naostatok formuluje určité úvahy k vybraným traktovaným inštitútom.","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121415626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Efektívne ústavné súdnictvo ako Ústavou chránená hodnota","authors":"Ladislav Orosz","doi":"10.33542/sic2019-1-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2019-1-01","url":null,"abstract":"Efektívna súdna kontrola ústavnosti je jednou z kľúčových charakteristík demokratického a právneho štátu a požíva ústavnú ochranu. Úlohou všetkých orgánov verejnej moci je preto v rámci svojej pôsobnosti zabezpečovanie funkčného ústavného súdnictva. Autor v všeobecnej rovine vymedzuje, kedy možno súdnu kontrolu ústavnosti za efektívnu a pomenúva kľúčové faktory, ktoré ju podmieňujú. Na tomto základe autor podrobuje kritickej analýze platnú ústavnú a zákonnú úpravu, ktorá tvorí právny základ činnosti Ústavného súdu Slovenskej republiky a formuluje námety na jej skvalitnenie.","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"14 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125990714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ON VIOLATION OF THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL BY INSUFFICIENT REASONING OF THE DECISION","authors":"P. Molnár","doi":"10.33542/sic2022-1-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2022-1-05","url":null,"abstract":"The author discusses a possible violation of the right to a fair trial due to deficiencies in the reasoning of the court decision. In the previous case law of the ordinary courts, the prevailing view was that deficient reasoning constituted so-called “other deficiency”. However, in the author's opinion, the recodification of civil procedure requires a reassessment of the case law from the time before the recodification, because despite different nominal grounds of cassation recourse (the so-called “other deficiency” is no longer a separate ground of cassation recourse) the scope of the right to a fair trial has not changed. The court decision is a part and culmination of the court’s conduct of proceedings, and in the reasoning of the decision, the court explains and defends the procedure it applied in establishing the factual and legal basis for its decision and the outcome of the proceedings itself. Therefore, the quality of the reasoning of a court decision must also be subject to effective examination in ordinary and extraordinary redress procedures. The Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic has also been calling for a reassessment of older case law","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131203829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ZODPOVEDNOSŤ ZA UJMU VYVOLANÚ PROCESNÝM ZABEZPEČENÍM PO REKODIFIKÁCII CIVILNÉHO PROCESNÉHO PRÁVA","authors":"Martin Serfőző","doi":"10.33542/sic2023-1-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2023-1-03","url":null,"abstract":"Predpoklady zodpovednosti za ujmu vyvolanú predbežným opatrením a neodkladným opatrením sú porovnateľné. V prípade neodkladného opatrenia je však predpokladom zodpovednosti dovolený druh neodkladného opatrenia. Aktuálne ním nie je neodkladné opatrenie vo veciach domáceho násilia, ani neodkladné opatrenie vydané podľa Civilného mimosporového poriadku. Absolútnu imunitu v týchto prípadoch navrhujeme upraviť. Právna teória a aplikačná prax preferuje pri zodpovednosti za ujmu vyvolanú neodkladným opatrením objektívny zodpovednostný princíp. S tým sa nestotožňujeme a zastávame názor, že zodpovednosť sa má vyvodzovať v závislosti od charakteru právneho vzťahu, v ktorom vznikla potreba nariadenia neodkladného opatrenia. Preto navrhujeme úpravu príslušných právnych noriem. Neodkladným opatrením možno, podľa nášho názoru, reparovať nie len majetkovú, ale aj nemajetkovú ujmu.","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128870796","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ČO JE QUEER/KVÍR TEÓRIA PRÁVA? (1. ČASŤ)","authors":"Dominik Šoltys","doi":"10.33542/sic2023-1-05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2023-1-05","url":null,"abstract":"Predložená štúdia sa zameriava na pojem, znaky, povahu, metódy a metodológiu queer teórie práva v kontexte významu špecifík pojmu queer a vo všeobecnom kontexte queer teórie. V nadväznosti na to popisuje, zdôvodňuje a analyzuje vplyv vyjadrenia prvkov nonnormativity, fluidnosti a diverzity v právnej vede. Štúdia je rozdelená do dvoch častí, pričom predložená prvá časť sa bližšie zameriava na popis najčastejšie sa vyskytujúcich a pripisovaných orientačných významov pojmu queer. Ukazuje, ako sa významová fluidnosť pojmu queer prenáša aj do konkrétnych orientačných vymedzení queer teórie. Ústredným motívom sa tak stáva vytvorenie predpokladov novej epistemologickej teórie, ktorá by dokázala teoreticky reprezentovať queer identitu/identity alebo pozíciu LGBTQIA+ ľudí vo vedeckej oblasti. Záver prvej časti štúdie je venovaný výpočtu a zhrnutiu predpokladov všeobecnej queer teórie, ktoré sa prenášajú do queer teórie práva a stávajú sa tak výzvou pre ich prispôsobenie v podmienkach právnej vedy.","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127660007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"CRIMEN REPETUNDARUM TRESTNÉ ČINY VYDIERANIA PROVINCIÍ (V RÍMSKOM PRÁVE)","authors":"Blažena Antalová","doi":"10.33542/sic2019-2-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2019-2-01","url":null,"abstract":"V poslednom období rímskej republiky dochádzalo k častým prípadom vydierania provincií ich miestodržiteľmi. Rímsky štát sa ich pokúsil odstrániť prijatím asi 10 zákonov, ktoré takéto činy trestali. Cieľom príspevku nebolo analyzovať všetky zákony, vzťahujúce sa na úpravu vydierania, ale zamerať pozornosť len na niektoré z nich, ktoré podľa názoru autorky najvýznamnejšie zasiahli do vývoja trestného práva republikánskeho obdobia. Príspevok poukázal, ako sa v priebehu vývoja menila skutková podstata tohto trestného činu, akými zmenami prešlo zloženie orgánov stíhajúcich vydieranie a ako sa menil aj charakter trestov za tieto činy.","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132818548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"THE PROCEDURAL POSITION OF THE INJURED PARTY IN THE CRIMINAL CASES IN POLAND","authors":"Andrzej Światłowski","doi":"10.33542/sic2022-1-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2022-1-10","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the possibilities of exercising the victims’ rights in the criminal proceedings in Poland. The author refers to the article by M. Strkolec published recently in Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia, in which the instructive observations about the position of the injured party in Slovak criminal trial were made, as well as de lege ferenda proposals have been put forward. The author takes a view from a Polish perspective and share some experience. In addition to comments on the positive law, it also presents selected findings made thanks to extensive research program devoted to the practical issues of the position and activity of the victim in the Polish criminal trial.","PeriodicalId":132927,"journal":{"name":"STUDIA IURIDICA Cassoviensia","volume":"251 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134111129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}