Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics最新文献

{"title":"On the Design, Manufacture and Premature Failure of a Metal Mesh Thrust Bearing: How Concepts That Work on Paper, Actually Do Not","authors":"Travis A. Cable, L. Andrés","doi":"10.1115/GT2018-75340","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75340","url":null,"abstract":"Oil-free micro turbomachinery (OFT) implements compliant foil bearings because of their minute drag and ability to operate in extreme (high or low) temperature. Prominent to date, bump-type foil bearings integrate an underspring thin metal structure that provides resilience and material damping; and while the rotor is airborne, acts in series with the stiffness and damping of the gas film. The design and manufacturing of foil bearings remains costly as it demands of extensive engineering and actual experience. Alternative foil bearing configurations, less costly and easier to manufacture, are highly desirable to enable widespread usage of OFT. This manuscript details the design and manufacturing of a novel Rayleigh-step metal mesh foil thrust bearing (MMFTB) as well as its testing on a dedicated rig. Metal mesh structures offer significant material structural damping and can be easily procured at a fraction of the cost of a typical bump foil strip layer.\u0000 The MMFTB consists of a solid carrier, a number of stacked annular Copper mesh sheets (wire diameter = 0.25, 0.3 and 0.41 mm), and a steel top foil (0.127 mm thick) that makes six pads (ID = 50.8 mm, OD = 2 ID), each 45° in extent. A 3 μm polymer coats each pad and a photo-chemical process etches a step 20 μm in height. Static and dynamic load measurements (without rotor speed) demonstrate the MMFTB has structural stiffness and material damping similar to that of a publicized bump-type foil thrust bearing. A maiden test of the MMFTB with rotor speed of Ω = 15 krpm (∼80 m/s at bearing outer diameter) proved briefly the bearing operation when applying a tiny thrust load. Further tests with ambient air, a rotor speed of 40 krpm (∼212 m/s at bearing OD), and a very light load/area < 7 kPa failed several of the prototype bearings, all exhibiting significant wear on one or more pads. The source of the failure is the inherent unevenness of the metal mesh stacked substructures, thus causing the pads to bulge towards the rotor collar surface before a load applies. A deficient anchoring method exacerbates the unevenness. Incidentally, a high rotor speed induced large windage that lifted the top foils pushing them against the spinning collar. As the bearing moved towards the rotating collar to begin applying thrust, the local high spots rubbed against the collar, before a hydrodynamic wedge could form to separate the surfaces. Without a robust sacrificial coating, metal-to-metal contact quickly disfigured the contacting top foil pads, erasing the etched step, and leading to failure.\u0000 In concept, and on paper, the mesh sheets and the top foil lay flat against the bearing carrier, giving a false sense of uniformity in the design process. In actuality, a designer must consider the manufactured states of the individual components and how they assemble. A redesign of the bearing intends to overcome the existing flaws (highlighted herein) by incorporating a thicker top foil that is well anchored (to better withs","PeriodicalId":131756,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125771704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients for Two Labyrinth Gas Seals: Teeth-on-Stator and Interlocking Teeth Configurations — A CFD Approach to Their Performance","authors":"L. Andrés, Tingcheng Wu","doi":"10.1115/GT2018-75205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-75205","url":null,"abstract":"Labyrinth gas seals (LS) commonly used in turbomachines reduce secondary flow leakage. Conventional see-through labyrinth seal designs include either all Teeth-On-Stator (TOS) or all Teeth-On-Rotor (TOR). Experience shows that an interlocking labyrinth seal (ILS), with teeth on both stator and rotor, reduces gas leakage by up to 30% compared to the conventional see-through designs. However, field data for ILS rotordynamic characteristics is still vague and scarce in the literature. This work presents flow predictions for an ILS and a TOS LS, both seals share identical design features, namely radial clearance Cr = 0.2 mm, rotor diameter D = 150 mm, tooth pitch Li = 3.75 mm, and tooth height B = 3 mm. Air enters the seal at supply pressure Pin = 3.8, 6.9 bar (absolute) and temperature of 25 °C. The ratio of gas exit pressure to supply pressure ranges from 0.5 to 0.8, and the rotor speed is fixed at 10 krpm (surface speed of 79 m/s). The analysis implements a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method with a multi-frequency-orbit rotor whirl model. The CFD predicted mass flow rate for the ILS is ∼21% lower than that of the TOS LS, thus making the ILS a more efficient choice. Integration of the dynamic pressure fields in the seal cavities, obtained for excitation frequency (ω) ranging from 12% to 168% of rotor speed (sub and super synchronous whirl), allows an accurate estimation of the seal dynamic force coefficients. For all the considered operating conditions, at low frequency range the TOS LS shows a negative direct stiffness (K < 0), frequency independent; whereas the ILS has K > 0 that increases with both frequency and supply pressure. For both seals, the magnitude of K decreases when the exit pressure/inlet pressure ratio increases. On the other hand, the cross-coupled stiffness (k) from both seals is frequency dependent, its magnitude increases with gas supply pressure, and the k for the ILS is more sensitive to a change in the exit/inlet pressure ratio. Notably, k turns negative for subsynchronous frequencies below rotor speed (Ω) for both the TOS LS and ILS. The direct damping (C) for the TOS LS remains constant for ω > ½ Ω and has a larger magnitude than the damping for the ILS over the frequency range up to 1.5Ω. An increase in exit/inlet pressure ratio decreases the direct damping for both seals. The effective damping coefficient, Ceff = (C-k/ω) whenever positive aids to damp vibrations, whereas Ceff < 0 is a potential source for an instability. For frequencies ω /Ω < 1.3, Ceff for the TOS LS is higher in magnitude than that for the ILS. From a rotordynamics point of view, the ILS is not a sound selection albeit it reduces leakage. Comparison of the CFD predicted force coefficients against those from a bulk flow model demonstrate the later simple model delivers poor results, often contradictory and largely indifferent to the type of seal, ILS or TOS LS. In addition, CFD model predictions are benchmarked against experimental dynamic force ","PeriodicalId":131756,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7B: Structures and Dynamics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126917741","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}