Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Mapping Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa: Historic Developments and Comparative Remarks 绘制中东和北非的宪法审查:历史发展和比较评论
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 2021-08-24 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-11
A. Schoeller-Schletter
{"title":"Mapping Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa: Historic Developments and Comparative Remarks","authors":"A. Schoeller-Schletter","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-11","url":null,"abstract":"a priori Incidental/ concrete control Individual complaint Mauretania Constitutional Council Yes No No Lebanon Constitutional Council Yes No No Syria Constitutional Court Yes No No Egypt Constitutional Court Yes Yes No Tunisia Constitutional Court Yes Yes No Bahrain Constitutional Court Yes Yes No Morocco Constitutional Court Yes Since 2011 No Algeria Constitutional Council Yes Since 2016 No Saudi Arabia Supreme Court N/A Yes No UAE Supreme Court No Yes No Iraq Supreme Court No Yes No Jordan High Tribunal No Filtered (Cass. C) No Kuwait Constitutional Court Yes Yes Yes Libya Supreme Court Yes No Yes Sudan Constitutional Court No No Yes Yemen Supreme Court No Yes Since 1991","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115798353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Challenging the Validity of Membership of the House of Representatives in Jordan 质疑约旦众议院成员资格的有效性
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-259
Laith K. Nasrawin
{"title":"Challenging the Validity of Membership of the House of Representatives in Jordan","authors":"Laith K. Nasrawin","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-259","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-259","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter aims to analyze the legal means available to challenge the validity of membership in the Jordanian House of Representatives, which is considered as one face of electoral disputes that arise after the completion of the voting process and the announcement of final results. The chapter focuses on the scrutiny that the Jordanian judiciary exercises in case of contesting the election procedures and consequently claiming that the membership of a certain candidate is void, from the legitimacy and constitutionality perspectives. The oversight of legitimacy revolves around the extent to which electoral procedures were violated, whereas the constitutional control relates to the extent the Law of Election is compatible with or contravenes the provisions of the Jordanian Constitution. Both methods were substantially revised in 2011, upon the comprehensive constitutional reform that Jordan conducted. Finally, the chapter deals with the legal implications of applying both the legitimacy and constitutional scrutiny with respect to the membership of those elected to the Jordanian House of Representatives.","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130618888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Guarantees and Challenges of Judicial Independence: The Constitutional Courts of Kuwait and Bahrain as Case Studies 司法独立的保障与挑战:以科威特和巴林宪法法院为个案研究
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-61
Salma Waheedi
{"title":"Guarantees and Challenges of Judicial Independence: The Constitutional Courts of Kuwait and Bahrain as Case Studies","authors":"Salma Waheedi","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-61","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-61","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127689756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Independence of Constitutional Judges: The Case of Jordan 宪法法官的独立性:约旦的案例
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-47
Sufian Obeidat
{"title":"The Independence of Constitutional Judges: The Case of Jordan","authors":"Sufian Obeidat","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-47","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-47","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126411918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constitutional Courts and Supreme Courts: A Difficult Relationship 宪法法院和最高法院:艰难的关系
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-77
Rainer Grote
{"title":"Constitutional Courts and Supreme Courts: A Difficult Relationship","authors":"Rainer Grote","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-77","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-77","url":null,"abstract":"In countries with a specialized constitutional jurisdiction, the smooth functioning of the separation of powers between a constitutional court and the supreme courts in the administrative, criminal, civil and other jurisdictions cannot be taken for granted. The expanding reach of constitutional law and especially of the fundamental rights provisions of contemporary constitutions render close cooperation between the former and the latter both more necessary and more complex. A comparative survey shows that this central institutional relationship has evolved very differently in the four major constitutional democracies of Germany, Italy, Spain and France. While in Germany a hegemonic position of the Constitutional Court was swiftly established and has largely been accepted by the supreme courts of the other jurisdictions, in Spain the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court has taken a confrontational turn which has severely impaired the former’s authority. These widely diverging experiences show that constitutional and statutory regulation alone is not sufficient to produce a stable and productive relationship if it is not backed up by mutual respect and understanding which can only result from a permanent dialogue between the courts.","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129881062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Changing Constitutional Framework of Church-State Relations in Europe 欧洲政教关系宪法框架的变迁
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-329
Rainer Grote
{"title":"The Changing Constitutional Framework of Church-State Relations in Europe","authors":"Rainer Grote","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-329","url":null,"abstract":"Although the Christian religion has lost its once-dominant place in European societies as they have taken on a more secular, religiously diverse character in the post-World War II era, the constitutional principles and rules governing the relationship between state and church have remained remarkably stable in most parts of non-Communist Europe. They can be grouped into three main categories, depending on the form and degree of cooperation or separation they provide for in the relationship between the established Church(es) and the state. By contrast, the task of accommodating the new religious groups including Muslims which are an important feature of the increasing religious diversity of European societies within the existing constitutional settlements on the relationship between the state and religion has largely been left to the legislature and the courts. This has allowed new meta-norms to penetrate the constitutional space of the European states, particularly the guarantees in the European Convention of Human Rights on religious liberty in its individual as well as collective dimensions and the principle of non-discrimination on religious grounds.","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131493167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Judicial Review of Elections: The Egyptian Experience 选举的司法审查:埃及的经验
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-209
Yussef Auf
{"title":"Judicial Review of Elections: The Egyptian Experience","authors":"Yussef Auf","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-209","url":null,"abstract":"In line with adopting the Egyptian Constitution of 1923, which paved the way for the first-ever pluralistic elections in the history of modern Egypt, the judicial bodies have been a major player in deciding not only on the election’s results and validity, but also on the electoral laws in terms of its constitutionality and legitimacy. While in Egypt the administrative courts decide in queries about the election’s procedures, the Court of Cassation, Egypt’s highest court in the general judiciary, decides on the validity of the MP’s memberships itself. Over time, the Supreme Constitutional Court has frequently been interacting with the electoral issues by deciding on the legitimacy and constitutionality of the electoral laws and regulations. This has been done by judicial review prior to the issuance of the law, and by judicial review after the law’s promulgation. This chapter discusses and illustrates the role that has been played over decades by various courts concerned with electoral disputes in Egypt","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127730055","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Constitutional Courts and Councils in the Middle East and North Africa: Basic Facts and Figures 中东和北非的宪法法院和委员会:基本事实和数据
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-377
A. Schoeller-Schletter, R. Poll
{"title":"Constitutional Courts and Councils in the Middle East and North Africa: Basic Facts and Figures","authors":"A. Schoeller-Schletter, R. Poll","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-377","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-377","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114213568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Extent of the Authority of the Constitutional Court of Kuwait to Annul an Elected Parliament: The Cases of the 2012 Parliaments 科威特宪法法院废除民选议会的权力范围:2012年议会的案例
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-229
Fawaz Almutairi
{"title":"The Extent of the Authority of the Constitutional Court of Kuwait to Annul an Elected Parliament: The Cases of the 2012 Parliaments","authors":"Fawaz Almutairi","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-229","url":null,"abstract":"The Kuwaiti Constitutional Court annulled two elected parliaments in the same year. The court annulled the National Assembly that was elected in February 2012 after four months of its election 1 , and the National Assembly that was elected in December 2012 after six months of its election 2 . The two decisions had a major impact on the extent of the court’s authority to nullify elected parliaments due to wrong governmental measures which have nothing to do with any parliamentary actions. The legal access to the Constitutional Court to examine the legitimacy of an elected parliament was through the exceptional authority granted to it to examine the electoral appeals. This chapter first discusses the extent of the Court’s jurisdiction to examine electoral appeals and then its authority to annul an elected parliament. The Constitutional Court has a number of competences - its inherent competence being to examine the constitutionality of laws and decrees. The control of election laws and the electoral process also fall under its jurisdiction, as is the case in several other countries of the region, for example Egypt. Here it may be considered as a normal Court where the electoral cases are appealed; whether concerning the division of constitu-encies or the voting mechanism. In some instances, the same court hears electoral appeals in terms of election invalidity, whether in relation to invalid legal procedures that vitiated the electoral process, or in relation to the inspection of practices during the electoral process, or in relation to arithmetic errors and erroneous announcement of results. Thus, through this appeal function and “detour” in cases, wherein the Constitutional Court examined the former Royal Decrees regarding the electoral process,","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125028833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Integrating or Polarising? How to Promote Integrative Decision-Making in Constitutional Courts 积分还是极化?如何促进宪法法院的一体化决策
Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783748912019-189
Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff
{"title":"Integrating or Polarising? How to Promote Integrative Decision-Making in Constitutional Courts","authors":"Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff","doi":"10.5771/9783748912019-189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748912019-189","url":null,"abstract":"For constitutional courts to be able to activate the integrative function of the constitution they have to interpret and apply, and to avoid the risk of fostering polarization, they must work in a collegial, consensus-oriented, deliberative way. Some courts do better on that score than others. Why is that so? The article draws attention to institutional frameworks explaining the differences in underlying cultures of deliberation. A fundamental difference between courts in common law countries with their historical roots in the tradition of seriatim decision-making, and courts outside the common law world with their less individualist decision-making traditions is that the former need a majority only for the outcome of a decision, whereas the latter need a majority for the reasons, as well. Many other institutional features, mentioned in the final section of the article, also matter. The differences with respect to majority requirements, however, provide a particularly telling example of how institutional frameworks shape judicial behavior in unnoticed ways.","PeriodicalId":129851,"journal":{"name":"Constitutional Review in the Middle East and North Africa","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132061547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信