发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

International Commentary on Evidence最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Response: Are Proffers of Inadmissible Evidence Wrongful? 回应:提供不可采信的证据是错误的吗?
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-15 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1103
E. Cheng
{"title":"Response: Are Proffers of Inadmissible Evidence Wrongful?","authors":"E. Cheng","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1103","url":null,"abstract":"This response explores the moral underpinnings of Professor Imwinkelried's article and asks whether attempts to introduce inadmissible evidence are wrongful as a general matter. It argues that the answer is “no.\" The current practice and structure of the evidentiary rules is a discretionary one, which not only makes any notion of “clear inadmissibility\" difficult to parse, but also means that attempts to introduce technically inadmissible evidence do not necessarily hinder the truth seeking purpose of trial.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115591814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Ethics of Trial Deliberation: Moral Agency in Legal Fact-Finding 审判审议的伦理:法律事实认定中的道德能动性
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-15 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1100
Amalia Amaya
{"title":"The Ethics of Trial Deliberation: Moral Agency in Legal Fact-Finding","authors":"Amalia Amaya","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1100","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1100","url":null,"abstract":"Section I explicates the building blocks of Ho's legal epistemology: the distinction between the internal and the external point of view, the belief account of legal fact-finding, and the claim that considerations of truth and justice are intertwined in evidence rules. Section II examines the applications of Ho's normative framework to the analysis of the standard of proof, the hearsay rule, and similar facts evidence. Part III subjects Ho's distinction between the internal and external point of view to close analysis in light of contemporary debates over the nature of epistemic justification. Part IV suggests that a turn towards virtue epistemology may provide a good way for extending Ho's approach to evidence law. Part V sheds doubts upon whether Ho's epistemology provides a justification of current evidentiary arrangements and argues that carrying out Ho's internal analysis would, in fact, lead to a substantial revision of those arrangements. The normative arguments of this book lend support to a conception of the law of evidence built around the notion of moral agency which constitutes a valuable normative ideal against which current rules of evidence may be assessed.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115860536","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Truth, Error and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology 真理、谬误与刑法:法学认识论述评
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-13 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1090
R. E. D. Munagorri
{"title":"Review of Truth, Error and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology","authors":"R. E. D. Munagorri","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1090","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130126712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Before We Move on to Another Topic: The Narrow Issue of Knowingly Proffering Inadmissible Evidence 在我们进入另一个话题之前:故意提供不可采信证据的狭隘问题
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-13 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1105
E. Imwinkelried
{"title":"Before We Move on to Another Topic: The Narrow Issue of Knowingly Proffering Inadmissible Evidence","authors":"E. Imwinkelried","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1105","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1105","url":null,"abstract":"This is a brief comment about Professor Cheng's response to my presentation at the 2009 AALS meeting on knowingly presenting inadmissible evidence. Professor Cheng proposes a broader discussion of the alleged wrongfulness of introducing inadmissible evidence. The purpose of this comment is to emphasize the importance of the narrow topic discussed in the original article.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126532168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evidentiary Foul Play: The Roles of Judge and Jury in Responding to Evidence Tampering 证据犯规:法官和陪审团在应对证据篡改中的作用
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-06 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1094
Dale A. Nance
{"title":"Evidentiary Foul Play: The Roles of Judge and Jury in Responding to Evidence Tampering","authors":"Dale A. Nance","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1094","url":null,"abstract":"For at least two centuries, Anglo-American courts have responded to a party's evidence tampering by allowing the opponent to argue to jurors that they should draw an adverse inference against the offending party in deciding the merits of the case. This essay argues that it is time that the use of such inferences be radically curtailed, not only because of the ambiguities and risks of prejudice that such inferences entail, but more importantly because they involve a confusion of roles in which the jury is enlisted to participate in the management of the pre-trial conduct of litigants. This management is properly the job of the judiciary, and there are more than adequate tools for this purpose in the form of discovery sanctions, such as issue preclusion, monetary awards, and dismissals or defaults.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115395233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Poetic Justice in Punishing the Evidentiary Misdeed of Knowingly Proffering Inadmissible Evidence 论惩治明知不能采信的证据过失的诗意正义
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-06 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1089
E. Imwinkelried
{"title":"Poetic Justice in Punishing the Evidentiary Misdeed of Knowingly Proffering Inadmissible Evidence","authors":"E. Imwinkelried","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1089","url":null,"abstract":"The civil procedure rules have been amended to curb pretrial discovery misconduct. The amendments may have deterred some such misconduct. However, the downside has been that the amendments have prompted expensive, time-consuming pretrial hearings which can make it more difficult for a litigant with a meritorious claim to reach trial. In some respects evidentiary misconduct at trial is an even more serious problem than pretrial discovery misconduct. The question is whether we can deter such misconduct without creating an impediment to a fair trial on the merits. To that end, this article proposes that in extreme cases, a litigant should be able to treat an opponent's knowing proffer of inadmissible evidence at trial as proof of the opposition's consciousness of the weakness of their position in the litigation.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126717116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Tribute to Professor Margaret Berger, Recipient of AALS Evidence Section's Wigmore Lifetime Achievement Award 向AALS证据部门威格莫尔终身成就奖获得者玛格丽特·伯杰教授致敬
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-06 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1092
Myrna S. Raeder
{"title":"Tribute to Professor Margaret Berger, Recipient of AALS Evidence Section's Wigmore Lifetime Achievement Award","authors":"Myrna S. Raeder","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1092","url":null,"abstract":"This is the tribute to Professor Margaret Berger that was delivered at the Association of American Law School's (AALS) Evidence Section Luncheon in San Diego, in January, 2009. Professor Berger received the Evidence Section's Wigmore Lifetime Achievement Award, and the remarks summarize her contributions to the evidence community, particularly focusing on her influence in the fields of scientific evidence, expert testimony, and confrontation clause analysis.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132149498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Current Issues in Evidence and Procedure - Comparative Comments from a Continental Perspective 证据和程序中的当前问题——来自大陆视角的比较评论
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-06 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1095
J. Nijboer
{"title":"Current Issues in Evidence and Procedure - Comparative Comments from a Continental Perspective","authors":"J. Nijboer","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1095","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, Professor Nijboer discusses three dimensions of generality in evidence and procedure: (1) generality of fundamental issues in evidence and fact-finding and insights about them across national borders, (2) generality of issues of criminal evidence across various relevant disciplines (and professions), and (3) generality with respect to specific issues of criminal evidence and its principles and rules addressing the various probanda of specific crimes (murder, theft, rape, arson, negligence causing a serious traffic accident, et cetera). He then comments on the contributions to this anniversary issue from a continental perspective, with frequent references to case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Professor Nijboer finds that while legal scholars are increasingly communicating with legal scholars in other countries and scientists from other fields, there is a simultaneous counter-tendency toward adoption of crime-specific rules of substantive law and evidentiary measures for specific kinds of crime (such as protection of witnesses in rape cases, where the protection complicates the fact-findings process). He concludes from this that there is a tension between greater generality in regard to the first two dimensions and increasing specificity in regard to the third. In his final paragraphs, he turns to W.L. Twining's description of the development of evidentiary theory, in which the same tension between dimensions can be seen. The European Union's increasing legal harmonization will probably promote further discussion of evidentiary theory across disciplinary, professional, and national boundaries.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"32 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132236408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
A Letter to Honor Professor Margaret Berger 致玛格丽特-伯杰教授的一封信
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2009-01-06 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1098
Jack B. Weinstein
{"title":"A Letter to Honor Professor Margaret Berger","authors":"Jack B. Weinstein","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1098","url":null,"abstract":"This piece is a letter to honor Professor Margaret Berger on her receipt of the Wigmore Lifetime Achievement Award from the Evidence Section of the Association of American Law Schools.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2009-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130853926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Book Review: Freeman, Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness 书评:弗里曼，真相委员会和程序公平
International Commentary on Evidence Pub Date : 2008-09-04 DOI: 10.2202/1554-4567.1079
N. Palmer
{"title":"Book Review: Freeman, Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness","authors":"N. Palmer","doi":"10.2202/1554-4567.1079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1554-4567.1079","url":null,"abstract":"Mark Freeman's book Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness provides a consolidated account of the procedural functioning of truth commissions. It appears at a crucial point in academic discussions around transitional justice. The book aspires to synthesize and document the lessons learnt from past experiences and in doing so makes a significant contribution to the area. The author does not, however, engage in a critical analysis of the use and role that truth commission play in societies in transition, failing to address how these procedures interact with broader legal systems. The recommendations, although useful, are taken outside of any country context, losing some of the nuance that makes truth commissions such remarkable yet often flawed responses to large-scale or prolonged human rights abuse.","PeriodicalId":129839,"journal":{"name":"International Commentary on Evidence","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116560453","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信