Studies on Turkish Politics and Society最新文献_第2页

Turkish Democracy at Impasse: Ideology, Party Politics and the Third Military Intervention 土耳其民主陷入僵局:意识形态、政党政治和第三次军事干预

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_011

引用次数: 3

A Language in Search of a Nation: Turkish in the Nation-State 寻找民族的语言:民族国家中的土耳其语

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_017

引用次数: 2

Socialism and the Labor Party of Turkey 社会主义和土耳其劳工党

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_014

引用次数: 2

Social Environment and Literature: The Reflection of the Young Turk Era (1908–1918) in the Literary Work of Ömer Seyfeddin (1884–1920) 社会环境与文学:青年土耳其时代(1908-1918)在Ömer Seyfeddin文学作品中的反映

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_018

引用次数: 1

The Turks in America 土耳其人在美国

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_024

引用次数: 11

The Impact of the People's Houses on the Development of Communication in Turkey (1931–1951) 民宅对土耳其通讯发展的影响(1931-1951)

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_015

引用次数: 0

Recent Political Developments in Turkey and their Social Background 土耳其最近的政治发展及其社会背景

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_007

引用次数: 3

Turkish Foreign Policy: Some Introductory Remarks 土耳其外交政策:一些引言

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 2004-01-01 DOI: 10.1163/9789047402718_020

引用次数: 2

Political Developments in Turkey, 1950–70 土耳其的政治发展，1950 - 1970年

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 1972-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/00263207208700214

Kemal H. Karpat

{"title":"Political Developments in Turkey, 1950–70","authors":"Kemal H. Karpat","doi":"10.1080/00263207208700214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00263207208700214","url":null,"abstract":"The elections of May 14, 1950, which brought the Democratic Party (Demokrat Parti) of Celal Bayar and Adnan Menderes, President and Premier in 1950-60 respectively, to power and sent the Republican Party (Cumhurriyet Halk Partisi) of Ismet Inonii into opposition (it is still there) was the turning point in Turkish political and social life. It set into motion a new process of leadership selection, social mobilization and broader popular participation. Now, twenty years after this memorable political event, one may rightly ask whether the Turkish efforts to adopt first the classical mechanism of European parliamentarianism and then the ideas of social democracy were successful at all. The answer is positive, despite the brief interlude of a military takeover in 1960-61. Instead of restoring a strong regime under one party government, as demanded by some intellectual and bureaucratic groups, the military ended their rule formally in 1961, by adopting a broadly based social and political order and a new constitution. The success of the Turkish experiment in parliamentary democracy stands in sharp contrast not only to the political regimes in the neighbouring countries but also to most of the Third World. It is true that the present regime in Turkey has been challenged by a variety of leftist and rightist groups, either because it supposedly retards modernization and does not achieve social justice, or because the economic development and the social change it promotes undermine the basic values and the established order in the society. But the regime seems to maintain its vitality. The purpose of this article is not to provide broad generalizations about Turkish politics but a general and factual analysis of some of the major internal and international developments occurring between 1950 and 1970. Nevertheless, in order to place these developments in proper perspective it is necessary to point out some basic historical and social factors which conditioned, at least in part, the emergence of the current parliamentary regime. The first factor is a historical one. The Turkish Republic inherited from the Ottoman Empire not only a strong bureaucratic organization but also a sophisticated political understanding of conflicts and experience in solving them. One may say that throughout the nineteenth century the Ottoman bureaucracy, despite its internal weaknesses, sought to reconcile the social and ethnic conflicts rising from the encounter with, as well as the pressure of Europe, its own traditions of authority and social organization. This tradition was based on the principle that the role of the government was to achieve balance among various forces and interests within the framework of a political system. The social and cultural system on one hand, and the political system on the other, were manipulated in practice as separate entities subject to their own exigencies. The ability of the Ottoman bureaucracy to separate in practice-the theory was rather a","PeriodicalId":127782,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Turkish Politics and Society","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1972-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126858146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 48

The Military and Politics in Turkey, 1960–64: A Socio-Cultural Analysis of a Revolution 土耳其的军事和政治，1960-64:一场革命的社会文化分析

Studies on Turkish Politics and Society Pub Date : 1970-10-01 DOI: 10.1086/AHR/75.6.1654

Kemal H. Karpat

引用次数: 35