{"title":"The General Data Protection Law in Brazil: What Comes Next?","authors":"Thiago Luís Santos Sombra","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020083","url":null,"abstract":"The Brazilian Data Protection Law (LGPD) will enter into force in August 2020. Brazil was one of the few countries among the major global economies not to have a regulatory framework for personal data protection, which means, it was a minor player in the subject with sparse regulations such as the Civil Rights Framework for the Internet, Civil Code and the Consumer Protection Code. The cultural change to be imposed by LGPD can be noticed by the principles that give legal grounds to the law. With around ten general principles, including purpose, necessity, open access, transparency, security, liability and accountability, which are particularly emphasized, LGPD aims to rebalance the games of power, increase transparency, responsiveness and empower the subjects of personal data in their interactions in cyberspace.\u0000Data Protection, cybersecurity, data subjects, LGPD, GDPR, Brazil","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115772404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Two-Year Anniversary of the GDPR: Where Do We Stand?","authors":"Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020079","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"305 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115934874","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Profiling Consumers Through Big Data Analytics: Strengths and Weaknesses of Article 22 GDPR","authors":"Maja Nišević","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020082","url":null,"abstract":"A new form of knowledge production that is flourishing in the Big Data age is profiling. In general, profiling means any form of discovering or constructing knowledge from large sets of data originating from a variety of sources. In a narrow sense, profiling is a way of making individual profiles, i.e. sets of characteristics, features, and attributes through which a person or group can be discerned from another person or group. Profiling is a relatively novel concept in European Union data protection law. It is defined in Article 4 (4) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). However, Article 22 of the GDPR determines the scope of protection in the case of profiling. This article focuses on an interpretation of Article 22. In addition, this article aims to give an overview of the wording, limitation and potential regulatory gaps, which exist in Article 22 of the GDPR.\u0000Big Data Analytics, algorithms, AI, GDPR, profiling, consent, contract","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130505160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Importance of ‘Smooth’ Data Usage and the Protection of Privacy in the Age of AI, IoT and Autonomous Robots","authors":"Fumio Shimpo","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020006","url":null,"abstract":"The emerging technologies of AI and autonomous robots are forcing us to consider not only improvements in the development of their industrial use but also further urgent research into the ethical and legal issues. In the future, autonomous robots equipped with AI will become more widespread in our society and such robot acquisition of data may lead to data confidentiality issues which we are not able to solve just by focusing solely on AI-data acquisition issues. This paper focuses on the possibilities of privacy violation and the issues which should be considered related to handling personal data and focuses on an introduction to the Japanese Personal Information Protection Act, the mutual adequacy findings between Japan and the EU, the Data Free-Flow with Trust (DFFT) initiative and future legal discussions about the increasing use of AI. Finally, I will point out the need to both clarify and streamline any related future regulations.\u0000AI, autonomous robots, IoT, Japan, emerging technologies","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127894006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Google v. CNIL and the Right to Be Forgotten: A Judgment of Solomon","authors":"B. Martín","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020008","url":null,"abstract":"The EUCJ ruling on Case C-507/17 provides further clarity on the territorial scope of the right to be forgotten. The court interprets that the EU law does not require a search engine operator to attend the right to de-referencing on all the versions of its search engine globally, but only on those corresponding to all the Member States, but at the same time it also clarifies that a supervisory or judicial authority of a Member State remains competent to, after weighing up the legally protected interests, order (where appropriate) that the de-referencing is carried out on all versions of the relevant search engine. A decision that likely does not please either the search engines or the data subjects, and which drops a certain dose of uncertainty on the system.\u0000GDPR, right to be forgotten, right to de-referencing, search engines, territorial scope","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130511775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Where Is Online Privacy Going?","authors":"Diego Fernández","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020007","url":null,"abstract":"Digital devices allow for the collection of large amounts of user data. This poses crucial questions regarding online privacy and the rights of associated thereto. For example, the data generated by cell phones allows the accurate location of the device. This information, which is normally stored by wireless carriers, can have great impact on criminal investigations as it can help locate people under investigation with accuracy. In that connection, last year the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on Carpenter, a leading case on geolocation through cell phones and privacy. The Supreme Court finally established that the standard required to collect geolocation data is that of a warrant. Interestingly, the Carpenter ruling was mirrored and cited by an Argentine court shortly after it was issued, and it is also being replicated throughout multiple jurisdictions as privacy, as we know it, might be changing substantially.\u0000privacy, geolocation, cellphone, cell-site, mobile devices","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114592763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Global Privacy News","authors":"Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020009","url":null,"abstract":"This article tracks significant developments in some of the key jurisdictions in the area of privacy, data protection, and cybersecurity. It provides concise reports to keep the reader up to date with some of the most recent developments across the globe.\u0000privacy, data protection, cyber security, global, news","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116374920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence (AI)","authors":"Carlota Cuatrecasas","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020003","url":null,"abstract":"The world is undoubtedly changing, and the Law cannot be left behind, since it plays a crucial and challenging role in this new era. New technologies, especially Artificial Intelligence, have an enormous potential to increase the effectiveness and excellence of lawyers' work, although they can also pose a great threat to citizens’ rights. That is why it is essential to establish legal limits that both guarantee the respect of such rights and facilitate the promising evolution that is being experienced. Without doubts, there is a very interesting legal challenge to be faced.\u0000AI, new technologies, risk, algorithm, judiciary","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"106 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130645774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial Note: 'In Memoriam: Giovanni Buttarelli'","authors":"L. C. Navas","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020002","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132525461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Addressable TV and Consent Sequencing","authors":"A. Atabey, Leyla Keser Berber","doi":"10.54648/gplr2020004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2020004","url":null,"abstract":"According to the preamble of the EU passenger rights regulation (EU Regulation 261/2004) strikes that affect the operation of an operating air carrier are explicitly provided as an example of extraordinary circumstances, exempting the air carrier from having to pay compensation to the passengers. Complex in this regard is how one should see strikes by airlines staff also named ‘internal strikes’.","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117307396","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}