Global Privacy Law Review最新文献_第5页

Guest Editors’ Notes: Privacy and Data Protection in Latin America: The Future of Privacy 《拉丁美洲的隐私和数据保护:隐私的未来》

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021011

Diego Fernández

引用次数: 0

Guest Editors’ Notes: Privacy Law in Chile: Recent Developments 客座编者按:智利的隐私法:最新发展

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021012

R. Momberg

引用次数: 0

Editorial: Data Protection in Latin America: An Overview 社论:拉丁美洲的数据保护:概述

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021010

Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan

引用次数: 0

Foreword: Convergence in Personal Data Protection: A Regulator’s View 前言:个人资料保护的趋同:监管者的观点

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021013

Felipe Rotondo Tornaría

引用次数: 0

Data Processors’ Liability from a Uruguayan Data Protection Perspective 从乌拉圭数据保护角度看数据处理者的责任

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021020

Sofía Anza, Josemaría Motta

引用次数: 0

Report: Privacy in Latin America During COVID-19 Times and Reasonable Digital Security 报告:2019冠状病毒病期间拉丁美洲的隐私和合理的数字安全

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021021

Guillermo E. Larrea, Juan Carlos Quinzaños

{"title":"Report: Privacy in Latin America During COVID-19 Times and Reasonable Digital Security","authors":"Guillermo E. Larrea, Juan Carlos Quinzaños","doi":"10.54648/gplr2021021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2021021","url":null,"abstract":"The global COVID-19 pandemic has tested the business and human capacity in Latin America to adapt to the digital world. While the world has experienced similar developments in privacy and data protection, the Latin American region is rarely analysed as a whole in terms of privacy and data protection. Besides GDPR, Latin America has older and even more robust data protection regimes than the US and is now quickly shifting to cybersecurity. In this article, we provide a quick overview of the data protection regimes in Latin America to summarize representative actions that countries in Latin America took for the protection of privacy and personal data during the pandemic period. We examine the factors and circumstances that have affected the region’s privacy through this period, including unsuitable data processing, the design of new tracking technologies, teleworking, the risks of relying on digital platforms, and alleged new cybersecurity regulation. With that in mind, we are making a value proposition towards identifying common factors for a reasonable security in order to help companies preparing to confront risks. This digital trend will undoubtedly resonate on the complexity of data transfers inbound and outbound the region, and the consequences of security breaches for those improperly processing data in the region.\u0000Mexico, Latin America, COVID-19, Digital Transformation, Cybersecurity, Personal Data, Data Processing, Incident Response, Teleworking, Reasonable Security, Privacy","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"1 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131436247","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Constitutional System for the Protection of Privacy in Chilean Law 智利法律中隐私权保护的宪法制度

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021017

Daniel Álvarez-Valenzuela

引用次数: 0

The Interpretation of ‘Household’ in the Definition of Personal Information in the CCPA 《消费者隐私法》中个人信息定义中“户”的解释

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021005

Mariusz Krzysztofek

{"title":"The Interpretation of ‘Household’ in the Definition of Personal Information in the CCPA","authors":"Mariusz Krzysztofek","doi":"10.54648/gplr2021005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2021005","url":null,"abstract":"The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) became enforceable on 1 July 2020. However, the interpretation of ‘household’ within the definition of a consumer’s personal information remains unclear. Since even a person living alone in a housing unit is counted as a household, it is not indicated how an individual within a household differs from a consumer in the definition of personal information. In other words, people who constitute a household are in the same time consumers as defined in the CCPA (California residents), so ‘household’ in the CCPA duplicates the meaning of ‘consumer’ in the definition of personal information. The guidance of the CCPA issued by the Attorney General’s Office actually show that at the end of the day, the household needs to be tied to a consumer in order to validate the request, for example in the guidance § 999.318 it is explicitly said ‘all consumers of the household’. The scope of the definition of personal information and therefore the scope of the CCPA becomes uncertain without answering the question of how ‘household’ is to be understood in the CCPA. This article discusses the answer to this question.\u0000CCPA, California Consumer Privacy Act, household, household definition, consumer, personal information, all consumers of the household","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129262651","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Editorial: Privacy in Challenging Times 社论:挑战时代的隐私

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021001

Ceyhun Necati Pehlivan

引用次数: 1

Is a Relative Definition of the Notion of Erasure the Much Sought-After Solution to the Dilemma Between Robust Integrity and Total Eradication? 擦除概念的相对定义是解决健壮完整性和完全根除之间困境的迫切需要的解决方案吗?

Global Privacy Law Review Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.54648/gplr2021004

Yves Bauer, Nathalie Tissot, Bertil Cottier, H. Mercier

{"title":"Is a Relative Definition of the Notion of Erasure the Much Sought-After Solution to the Dilemma Between Robust Integrity and Total Eradication?","authors":"Yves Bauer, Nathalie Tissot, Bertil Cottier, H. Mercier","doi":"10.54648/gplr2021004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2021004","url":null,"abstract":"This article highlights the tension that lies between the General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR’s) security and minimization principles. The implementation of state-of-the-art technologies, such as entanglement or blockchains, offers promising opportunities for data controllers to guarantee the security of the data they process, particularly in relation to availability and accuracy. On the other hand, such technologies may enter into conflict with other obligations, especially regarding the erasure of data (at the end of data life or requested by the data subject). We argue that the interpretation of the notion of erasure shall not be limited to the physical destruction of the data, but shall also extend, when technical measures implemented for the purpose of guaranteeing security do not allow for the physical destruction of the data, to ‘relative erasures’, or processing activities that have for effect to put the data beyond use in a way that makes it impossible, for the controller or third parties, to process it again without disproportionate efforts. Such interpretation would allow data controllers who implement strong security measures to comply with the GDPR. Combined with a careful design of privacy, it may further guarantee the data subject’s rights without requiring detrimental security concessions.\u0000GDPR, erasure, minimization principle, right to erasure, data life cycle, anti-tampering technologies, blockchain technologies, data availability, data integrity, data deletion, data erasure","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130300478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0