Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional?最新文献_第2页

Intellectual property pluralism in African development agendas: food security, plant variety protection and the role of the WIPO 非洲发展议程中的知识产权多元化:粮食安全、植物品种保护和WIPO的作用

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 2019-06-28 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00009

Susan Isiko Štrba

引用次数: 0

Protecting traditional knowledge in Australia: what can we learn from India and Peru? 在澳大利亚保护传统知识:我们可以从印度和秘鲁学到什么?

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 2019-06-28 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00016

Evana Wright

引用次数: 0

Geographical indications in Nepal: in search of identity 尼泊尔的地理标志:寻找身份

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 2018-09-05 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00017

Pratyush Nath Upreti

引用次数: 2

Whatever became of global, mandatory, fair use? A case study in dysfunctional pluralism 全球性的、强制性的、合理的使用变成了什么?功能失调的多元主义个案研究

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 2018-02-06 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00008

L. Bently, Tanya Aplin

{"title":"Whatever became of global, mandatory, fair use? A case study in dysfunctional pluralism","authors":"L. Bently, Tanya Aplin","doi":"10.4337/9781788977999.00008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977999.00008","url":null,"abstract":"The international copyright system requires all participants to recognise a freedom for fair quotation that covers much of the ground encompassed by the notion of ‘fair use.’ The obligation derives from Article 10(1) of the Berne Convention and thus applies to some 174 countries (and, because Article 10(1) must be complied with under TRIPS, is carried over into the WTO Agreement). In contrast to other limitations in Berne, Article 10(1) is not optional, it is mandatory. It creates an obligation, and thereby imposes a ceiling on the freedom of action of Members of the Union. The breadth of the obligatory exception is wide: as enacted in national law, it should not be limited by work, nor by type of act, nor by purpose. The exception should not be subjected to additional conditions beyond those recognised in Article 10: to do so is to breach the obligation. Subject to those conditions, the freedom the Article secures to users encompasses any and every act of quotation, the meaning of which reflects how the term is ordinarily used across all cultural forms. That includes free-standing uses, transformative uses and parodic uses. Its breadth reflects, but is not limited by, the desire to give effect to the fundamental freedom, freedom of expression. We have dubbed this ‘global, mandatory, fair use’, or GMFU, for short. \u0000Yet, despite this obligation, there has been a marginalisation of Article 10(1) and this paper explores how, and why, this distortion of international obligations has occurred. It suggests the dangers of pluralism in copyright when it comes to international obligations.","PeriodicalId":126640,"journal":{"name":"Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional?","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121171564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Pluralism within a framework of international norms: comparative perspectives and national policy drivers 国际规范框架内的多元主义:比较视角和国家政策驱动因素

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00012

引用次数: 0

Rigidity and flexibility of patent law 专利法的刚性和灵活性

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00024

引用次数: 0

Making of patent law at the digital frontier – patents at the age of 3D printing 数字前沿专利法的制定——3D打印时代的专利

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00028

Nari Lee

引用次数: 0

A more pluralistic approach to copyright protection after the Marrakesh Treaty 《马拉喀什条约》之后版权保护的更加多元化的做法

Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.4337/9781788977999.00022

Karolina Sztobryn

引用次数: 1