Food and drug law journal最新文献_第4页

Could State Regulations be the Next Frontier in Preemption Jurisprudence? Drug Compounding as a Case Study. 国家法规会成为优先购买权法理学的下一个前沿吗?药物复合作为案例研究。

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Nathan A Brown, Eli Tomar

引用次数: 0

Tracing FTC’s Line on Commercial Speech: What Makes an Ad an Ad and Why Does It Matter? 追踪美国联邦贸易委员会对商业言论的态度:什么使广告成为广告，为什么它很重要?

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Katie Bond

引用次数: 0

FDA Regulation of Clinical Applications of CRISPR-CAS Gene-Editing Technology. FDA关于CRISPR-CAS基因编辑技术临床应用的规定。

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Evita V Grant

引用次数: 0

Preemption of Non-Federal Restraints on Off-Label Product Communications. 非联邦对标签外产品沟通限制的优先考虑。

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Jeffrey Chasnow, Geoffrey Levitt

引用次数: 0

The Law of 180-Day Exclusivity. 180天排他性法则

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Erika Lietzan, Julia Post

引用次数: 0

A Spoonful of (Added) Sugar Helps the Constitution Go Down: Curing the Compelled Speech Commercial Speech Doctrine with FDA’s Added Sugars Rule. 一勺(添加的)糖有助于宪法下降:用FDA的添加糖规则治愈强迫言论商业言论原则。

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Colleen Smith

{"title":"A Spoonful of (Added) Sugar Helps the Constitution Go Down: Curing the Compelled Speech Commercial Speech Doctrine with FDA’s Added Sugars Rule.","authors":"Colleen Smith","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>On May 27, 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it was adopting a new rule that requires food manufacturers to list—on the already mandated Nutrition Facts label—how many grams of sugar have been added to a food product. Many opponents have criticized this “added sugars” rule on First Amendment grounds, arguing that the rule violates the commercial speech rights of food manufacturers. Whether the rule would survive constitutional scrutiny or not is an open question because the compelled commercial speech doctrine is anything but clear. Courts are split over whether Zauderer’s rational basis test, Central Hudson’s intermediate scrutiny, or some combination of the two should apply to a mandated disclosure like FDA’s added sugars rule. This Paper explains that the added sugars rule is unique in the history of mandated nutrition labeling in that the rule is motivated largely by public health concerns and backed by reports that assert that consumers should limit their intake of added sugars. In contrast, correcting and preventing consumer deception has been a major driving force behind the remainder of FDA’s mandated nutrition labeling. Because of this distinct rationale, the added sugars rule does not fit neatly into any currently existing compelled commercial speech test. This Paper uses the added sugars rule to highlight the deficiencies in the existing tests. Finally, this Paper proposes a new compelled commercial speech test that would adequately balance the interest of all of the effected parties: the government, the public, and food manufacturers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12282,"journal":{"name":"Food and drug law journal","volume":"71 3","pages":"442-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"35611878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

You Want a Warning with That? Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, Safety Warnings, and the Constitution. 你想要警告吗?含糖饮料、安全警告和宪法。

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Sabrina S Adler, Ian E McLaughlin, Seth E Mermin, Reece W Trevor

引用次数: 0

E-cigarette Regulation and Harm Reduction: The Case of Hong Kong. 电子烟规管及减低危害:以香港为例。

IF 0.2 4区医学

Food and drug law journal Pub Date : 2016-01-01

Shue Sing Churk

引用次数: 0

Effectively Regulating E-Cigarettes and Their Advertising--And the First Amendment. 有效监管电子烟及其广告——以及第一修正案。