IALS Student Law Review最新文献_第2页

Categorizing Foreign Direct Investment Protection Mechanisms 外国直接投资保护机制分类

IALS Student Law Review Pub Date : 2019-09-05 DOI: 10.14296/ISLR.V0I0.4953

Wael Saghir

引用次数: 1

Editorial Board and Associate Editors 编辑委员会和副编辑

IALS Student Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-09 DOI: 10.14296/ISLR.V0I0.4957

Narayana Harave

引用次数: 4

Rethinking the Common Intention Constructive Trusts in Stack v Dowden and Jones v Kernott – should the Resulting Trusts be preferred? 重新思考Stack v Dowden和Jones v Kernott案中的共同意图推定信托——是否应该优先考虑结果信托?

IALS Student Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-09 DOI: 10.14296/ISLR.V6I1.4962

Yee Ching Leung

{"title":"Rethinking the Common Intention Constructive Trusts in Stack v Dowden and Jones v Kernott – should the Resulting Trusts be preferred?","authors":"Yee Ching Leung","doi":"10.14296/ISLR.V6I1.4962","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14296/ISLR.V6I1.4962","url":null,"abstract":"Yee Ching Leung takes the two landmark cases, Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 and Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53, as starting points to consider the new Common Intention Constructive Trust approach in dealing with the issue of how the beneficial interest of a property is to be shared between two separating cohabitants. The article analyses whether this new approach should be preferred over the traditional Resulting Trust approach. The author explains the two approaches and gives three arguments in support of the Resulting Trust approach. First, it provides a greater degree of certainty, which is crucial in property law. Secondly, the traditional approach is more coherent in principle when comparing to the Common Intention Constructive Trust approach. Thirdly, the author argues that the Resulting Trust approach would not leave the discretion of judges unconfined. Toward the end of the article, the author gives two brief replies to the critics of the Resulting Trust approach. However, the Common Intention Constructive Trust approach is now the law of England and whether the Resulting Trust approach will return remains to be seen.","PeriodicalId":122771,"journal":{"name":"IALS Student Law Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117003540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Still Keeping Secrets? Bank Secrecy, Money Laundering, and Anti-Money Laundering in Switzerland and Singapore 还在保守秘密吗?瑞士和新加坡的银行保密、洗钱和反洗钱

IALS Student Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-09 DOI: 10.14296/ISLR.V0I0.4955

Shiqing Yu

引用次数: 2

Editorial Board and Associate Editors 编辑委员会和副编辑

IALS Student Law Review Pub Date : 2018-09-26 DOI: 10.14296/islr.v2i2.2178

ISLRev Editorial Board

引用次数: 0

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its associated potential criminal risks “一带一路”倡议及其潜在的犯罪风险

IALS Student Law Review Pub Date : 2018-09-25 DOI: 10.14296/islr.v5i2.4907

Shiqing Yu