Regionalism and Human Protection最新文献

A Regional Responsibility to Protect? Towards ‘Enhancing Regional Action’ in Africa 区域保护的责任?迈向“加强非洲区域行动”

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1163/9789004363212_012

Ifediora Obinna Franklin

引用次数: 0

Conclusion 结论

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1163/9789004363212_014

Charles T. Hunt, Noel M. Morada

引用次数: 0

Bridging the Protection Gap: Rethinking the ‘Three Pillars’ to Eliminate Sexual and Gender-Based Violence in asean 弥合保护差距:重新思考东盟消除性暴力和性别暴力的“三大支柱”

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1163/9789004363212_006

Maria Tanyag

引用次数: 1

Human Protection in Africa’s Regional Arrangements: Regional Perspectives and Institutional Expressions 非洲区域安排中的人类保护:区域视角和体制表现

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1163/9789004363212_009

T. Charles

引用次数: 1

The Role of csos in Promoting Human Rights Protection, Mass Atrocities Prevention, and Civilian Protection in Armed Conflicts 民间社会组织在武装冲突中促进人权保护、防止大规模暴行和保护平民方面的作用

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1163/9789004363212_011

Eze Chukwuemeka B.

引用次数: 0

asean and Human Protection in Myanmar: From Non-Interference to Non-Indifference? 东盟与缅甸人权保护:从不干涉到不冷漠?

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1163/9789004363212_007

Noel M. Morada

引用次数: 2

The African Union as a Norm Entrepreneur: The Limits of Human Protection and Mass Atrocities Prevention1 作为规范企业家的非洲联盟:人类保护的极限和大规模暴行的预防

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1163/9789004363212_010

Murithi Tim

引用次数: 0

asean Human Rights Regime and Mainstreaming the Responsibility to Protect: Challenges and Prospects 东盟人权制度与保护责任主流化:挑战与前景

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2016-05-24 DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00803004

S. Petcharamesree

{"title":"asean Human Rights Regime and Mainstreaming the Responsibility to Protect: Challenges and Prospects","authors":"S. Petcharamesree","doi":"10.1163/1875984X-00803004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00803004","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the challenges and prospects of mainstreaming RtoP in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations ( ASEAN ) through the analysis of the roles and performance of the ASEAN human rights bodies, in particular the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights ( AICHR ). The author argues that although ASEAN has made some progress in institutionalizing the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, it will take more time for ASEAN to mark substantial shift in intra- ASEAN relations and suggests that, in Southeast Asia where sovereignty is still jealously guarded, norms and ideas such as RtoP cannot yet have a decisive impact in practice. Specifically, mainstreaming RtoP in ASEAN is constrained by the principles of non-interference and consensus decision-making, which unfortunately remains the norm. In order for ASEAN to effectively care for people, a paradigm shift is necessary. Such shift can be anchored in the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration ( AHDR ) as well as employing the ‘ ASEAN minus X’ decision-making formula, activating the Troika, and dispatching of special envoys. These options, which are not new to ASEAN and have historically helped in its engagement with human rights, could also enable ASEAN to prevent and respond to systematic human rights violations and other issues which may amount to war crimes. As well, promoting national and regional dialogues on RtoP could influence ASEAN member states, especially those who are not yet comfortable with the principle. Different workshops and seminars that the AICHR has been organizing already provide the body opportunities for sharing and learning from other regions.","PeriodicalId":122760,"journal":{"name":"Regionalism and Human Protection","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121429057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21

Atrocity Prevention: From Promise to Practice in the Asia Pacific 预防暴行:亚太地区从承诺到实践

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2016-05-24 DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00803006

A. Bellamy

引用次数: 2

Regionalizing Protection: au and asean Responses to Mass Atrocity Crimes against Internally Displaced Persons 区域化保护:非盟和东盟对针对国内流离失所者的大规模暴行罪行的反应

Regionalism and Human Protection Pub Date : 2016-05-24 DOI: 10.1163/1875984X-00803011

Philip C Orchard

{"title":"Regionalizing Protection: au and asean Responses to Mass Atrocity Crimes against Internally Displaced Persons","authors":"Philip C Orchard","doi":"10.1163/1875984X-00803011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00803011","url":null,"abstract":"Forcible displacement can constitute a mass atrocity crime. This is something that is considered within the non-binding Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. Efforts to implement the Guiding Principles at the regional level suggest one path to implement stronger legal protections for internally displaced persons (IDPs), in particular, against mass atrocity crimes. These regional processes, however, can vary in remarkable ways. In the African Union, the Kampala Convention has brought the Guiding Principles and protections against mass atrocity crimes directed at IDPs into regional hard law; it also includes robust implementation and enforcement mechanisms. At this stage, however, these mechanisms remain anticipatory rather than effective; consequently international assistance will be vital to entrench the rights anchored in the Convention. By contrast, ASEAN has introduced no overt protections for IDPs. However, its developing legal human rights framework through the ASEAN Declaration of Human Rights, coupled with the Association’s response to the Rohingya IDP crisis in Myanmar, suggests that a policy-focused change, while incremental, may be happening.","PeriodicalId":122760,"journal":{"name":"Regionalism and Human Protection","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116828810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2