{"title":"Alexey Zhavoronkov. Nietzsche und Homer. Tradition der klassischen Philologie und philosophisher Kontext.","authors":"Dmitry V. Bugai","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-444-448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-444-448","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114966217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Oskar Goldberg’s Die Wirklichkeit der Hebräer (Fragments). Translator’s Foreword","authors":"Konstantin Yu. Burmistrov","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-406-416","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-406-416","url":null,"abstract":"Publication of the 1st volume of Die Wirklichkeit der Hebräer (The Reality of the Jews, 1925), the main work of the German-Jewish thinker of the early 20th century Oskar Goldberg (1885–1952), brought him considerable fame and led to fierce controversy. Structuring his book as a quaint metaphysical commentary on the biblical text, Goldberg re- flects on the fate of mankind, putting forward an original idea of the exis- tence of a cosmic magical-biological force that manifests itself in history. His ideas about the connection between God, the (metaphysical) people who made a covenant with Him, and the place (territory) established by this covenant, as well as about the decline that the violation of this connec- tion entails, and about the possibility and necessity of its restoration for the preservation of the people and the human race as a whole made a noticeable impact on some philosophers and writers of that era. Our publication offers a Russian translation of the first chapter and fragments of the second chapter of this book, in which Goldberg explains the philosophical and hermeneutic principles of his approach to interpreting Scripture and understanding history.","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134140167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Can We Blame Aristotle? The Case of Slavery","authors":"Artem T. Iunusov","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-209-260","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-209-260","url":null,"abstract":"The recent public discussion that took place in the wake of the Black Lives Matter movement and focused on the question of whether we should hold accountable proponents of slavery throughout history touched upon Aristotle, among others (although he was far from being at the centre of it). The very question of holding Aristotle accountable or blaming him for his views on slavery strikes some people as preposterous – perhaps as bearing a clear mark of partisan cultural policies. However, I see no reason it cannot be asked and discussed. Moreover, prima facie, Aristotle very well deserves to be blamed. In this paper, I attempt to classify and explore the main ways we could (and historically did) try to show that it is not appropriate to blame Aristotle, i.e., the ways we could try to excuse or vindicate him. We can attempt to do it on theoretical grounds from within his theory of slavery (§ 1), on historical or psychological grounds, external to this theory (§ 2) and on purely moral grounds (§ 3). As far as I can tell, all those attempts ultimately fail. As a result, I see nothing that would make blaming Aristotle for his views on slavery inappropriate or irrational. I conclude my discussion by touching upon the question of what forms this blaming might appropriately take.","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128909265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Piama Gaidenko and the Philosophers of the Sixties","authors":"Erikh Yu. Solov’ev","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-261-291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-261-291","url":null,"abstract":"This article is an essay on the life and work of Piama P. Gaidenko. I argue that Gaidenko belonged to the informal community of philosophers of the Sixties who sought to bring about a radical renewal of Soviet philosophy. However, unlike most of them, ever since her post-graduate years she had been a religious philosopher. Her works The Tragedy of Aestheticism, The Evolution of the Concept of Science and Breakthrough to the Transcendent are the most expressive evidence of this. They defend a moral philosophy based on faith and opposed to the Hegelian apology of speculative reason. Gaidenko insists that philosophically meaningful faith is compatible with scientific rationality. A strictly rational account of the philosopher’s mission and of the relationship of philosophy with art, religion, and science, she argues, ought to be an indispensable component of a moral philosophy based on faith. In the paper I pay special attention (as did Gaidenko herself) to the problem of making the philosophical heritage relevant and the concept of existential philosophy in Gaidenko’s work. The essay is supplemented by a review of Gaydenko’s re-published, little-known article “Apocalypticism, Chiliasm and Hellenic Philosophy” (2000). In it I focus mainly on the relation between philosophy and Christianity and the transformation of Utopianism in an era of deepening secularization.","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133952945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Richard Pohle. Platon als Erzieher. Platonrenessance und Antimodernismus in Deutschland (1890–1933)","authors":"Maksim R. Demin","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-458-464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-458-464","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116238985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Panagiotis Kondylis (1943–1998)","authors":"Sebastian Edinger","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-312-332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-312-332","url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes the life, key works and ideas of Panagiotis Kondylis, one of the most underappreciated Western philosophers of the 20th century. The primary focus is on Kondylis’ theory of the New Era, in particular on his concepts of intellectualism (as opposed to rationalism), rehabilitation of sensibility, unifying philosophy and conservatism.","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"26 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120848444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"False Pleasures in the Philebus: Standard Interpretation and Its Critics","authors":"Olga V. Alieva","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-124-146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-124-146","url":null,"abstract":"In the second half of the 20th century, Socrates’ argument in the Philebus 36b–40a came to be considered as anticipating the modern definition of pleasure as a “propositional attitude”. According to this reading, Protarchus’ position is close to that of Descartes, who thought that we enjoy infallibility regarding passions, or to that of Hume, for whom pleasures are not the kind of mental state that can be true or false at all. Hence Socrates’ criticism of hedonism allegedly proceeds from the assumption that pleasures are true and false in the same way as beliefs are. Various accounts of how this can be possible have formed the standard interpretation of the argument within which “the Old School” is mainly inspired by B. Williams’ notion of false pleasures while “the New School” understands “falsity” in a way similar to that of S. Lovibond. This paper offers an overview of competing reconstructions of the argument and highlights some weak points of the standard interpretation.","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122479102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Yulia V. Sineokaya, comp. and ed. Responses. Philosophical Conversations","authors":"Nataliya I. Kuznetsova","doi":"10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-490-496","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21146/0134-8655-2022-37-490-496","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":119299,"journal":{"name":"History of Philosophy Yearbook","volume":"516 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123205184","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}