发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
A review of Global Justice and International Labour Rights 《全球正义与国际劳工权利》综述
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/GJN.10.2.153
P. Fagan
{"title":"A review of Global Justice and International Labour Rights","authors":"P. Fagan","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.153","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.153","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>N/A</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132654915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Democratic Inclusion Beyond Borders: Introduction 超越国界的民主包容:导论
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/GJN.10.2.166
Tomer J. Perry
{"title":"Democratic Inclusion Beyond Borders: Introduction","authors":"Tomer J. Perry","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.166","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.166","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>N/A</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127362111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Democratizing Global ‘Bodies Politic’: Collective Agency, Political Legitimacy, and the Democratic Boundary Problem 民主化全球“政治体”:集体代理、政治合法性和民主边界问题
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/GJN.10.2.143
Terry Macdonald
{"title":"Democratizing Global ‘Bodies Politic’: Collective Agency, Political Legitimacy, and the Democratic Boundary Problem","authors":"Terry Macdonald","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.143","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.143","url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines a new approach to answering the foundational question in democratic theory of how the boundaries of democratic political units should be delineated. Whereas democratic theorists have mostly focused on identifying the appropriate population-group – or demos – for democratic decisionmaking, it is argued here that we should also take account of considerations relating to the appropriate scope of a democratic unit’s institutionalized governance capabilities – or public power. These matter because democratically legitimate governance is produced not only through the decision-making agency of a demos, but also through the institutionally distinct sources of political agency that shape the governance capabilities of public power. To develop this argument, the article traces a new theoretical account of the normative and institutional sources of collective agency, political legitimacy, and democratic boundaries, and illustrates it through a democratic reconstruction of the classical body politic metaphor. It further shows how this theoretical account lends strong prescriptive support to pluralist institutional boundaries within democratic global governance.","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132554406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Fair Trade: An Imperfect Obligation? 公平贸易:不完美的义务?
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/GJN.10.2.152
Nicole Hassoun
{"title":"Fair Trade: An Imperfect Obligation?","authors":"Nicole Hassoun","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.152","url":null,"abstract":"Fair Trade is under fire. Some critics argue, for instance, that there is no obligation to purchase Fair Trade certified products and that doing so may even be counter-productive. Others worry that well-justified conceptions of what makes trade fair can conflict. Yet others suggest that the common arguments for Fair Trade cannot justify purchasing Fair Trade certified goods, in particular. This paper starts by sketching one common argument for Fair Trade and defends it against this last line of criticism. In particular, it argues that we should purchase Fair Trade certified goods because doing so benefits the poor even though there are other ways to alleviate poverty. It then considers how other common arguments for Fair Trade fare in light of similar criticism and concludes that they may well succeed.","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"409 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123562041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 2017 Annual Jonathan Trejo-Mathys Essay Prize 2017年度Jonathan Trejo-Mathys论文奖
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/gjn.10.2.167
T. Editors
{"title":"The 2017 Annual Jonathan Trejo-Mathys Essay Prize","authors":"T. Editors","doi":"10.21248/gjn.10.2.167","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/gjn.10.2.167","url":null,"abstract":"<jats:p>N/A</jats:p>","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122134998","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Should International Organizations Include Beneficiaries in Decision-making? Arguments for Mediated Inclusion 国际组织应该在决策中包括受益者吗?调解包容的论据
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/GJN.10.2.147
C. Tenove
{"title":"Should International Organizations Include Beneficiaries in Decision-making? Arguments for Mediated Inclusion","authors":"C. Tenove","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.147","url":null,"abstract":"There are longstanding calls for international organizations (IOs) to be more inclusive of the voices and interests of people whose lives they affect. There is nevertheless widespread disagreement among practitioners and political theorists over who ought to be included in IO decision-making and by what means. This paper focuses on the inclusion of IOs’ ‘intended beneficiaries,’ both in principle and practice. It argues that IOs’ intended beneficiaries have particularly strong normative claims for inclusion because IOs can affect their vital interests and their political agency. It then examines how these claims to inclusion might be feasibly addressed. The paper proposes a model of inclusion via representation and communication, or ‘mediated inclusion.’ An examination of existing practices in global governance reveals significant opportunities for the mediated inclusion of IOs’ intended beneficiaries, as well as pervasive obstacles. The paper concludes that the inclusion of intended beneficiaries by IOs is both appropriate and feasible.","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117196350","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle 经济参与权与受影响原则
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/GJN.10.2.144
A. Zimmermann
{"title":"Economic Participation Rights and the All-Affected Principle","authors":"A. Zimmermann","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.144","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.144","url":null,"abstract":"The democratic boundary problem raises the question of who has democratic participation rights in a given polity and why. One possible solution to this problem is the all-affected principle (AAP), according to which a polity ought to enfranchise all persons whose interests are affected by the polity’s decisions in a morally significant way. While AAP offers a plausible principle of democratic enfranchisement, its supporters have so far not paid sufficient attention to economic participation rights. I argue that if one commits oneself to AAP, one must also commit oneself to the view that political participation rights are not necessarily the only, and not necessarily the best, way to protect morally weighty interests. I also argue that economic participation rights raise important worries about democratic accountability, which is why their exercise must be constrained by a number of moral duties.","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134373470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Guns or Food: On Prioritizing National Security over Global Poverty Relief 枪支还是食物:将国家安全置于全球扶贫之上
Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric Pub Date : 2018-09-24 DOI: 10.21248/GJN.10.2.149
Francisco Garcia‐Gibson
{"title":"Guns or Food: On Prioritizing National Security over Global Poverty Relief","authors":"Francisco Garcia‐Gibson","doi":"10.21248/GJN.10.2.149","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21248/GJN.10.2.149","url":null,"abstract":"Political realists claim that international relations are in a state of anarchy, and therefore every state is allowed to disregard its moral duties towards other states and their inhabitants. Realists argue that complying with moral duties is simply too risky for a state’s national security. Political moralists convincingly show that realists exaggerate both the extent of international anarchy and the risks it poses to states who act morally. Yet moralists do not go far enough, since they do not question realism’s normative core: the claim that when national security is really at risk, states are allowed to disregard their moral duties. I contend that there is at least one moral duty that states should not disregard even if their inhabitants are at risk of death by military aggression: the duty to reduce extreme global poverty. The reason is that even granting that national security is about securing individuals’ right to life, global poverty relief is about that as well.","PeriodicalId":117351,"journal":{"name":"Global Justice : Theory Practice Rhetoric","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126424222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信