Drugs最新文献

{"title":"Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Modulators in Adults with Hypertension: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Xiaoyan Yi, Shumin Yang, Jun Yang, Xiangjun Chen, Aipin Zhang, Qinglian Zeng, Wenjin Luo, Qifu Li, Jinbo Hu","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02092-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02092-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although a range of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) modulators are available for blood pressure lowering, the optimal choice within this class remains unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of RAAS modulators in the adult hypertensive population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary efficacy outcome was cardiovascular mortality. Tolerability outcome was discontinuation due to adverse events. Safety outcomes included the occurrence of cough, dizziness, edema, hyperkalemia, and hypotension. Network meta-analyses were performed utilizing a random-effects model within a frequentist framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We finally identified 51 articles from 49 randomized controlled trials. When compared to placebo, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.92) and cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.68-0.93), while none of other RAAS modulators significantly lowered the risk of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Individual comparisons indicated that MRAs were associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality than the other RAAS modulators (reduction: 16% compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), 14% compared with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and 22% compared with direct renin inhibitors (DRIs)). No difference in discontinuation due to adverse events was found in a comparison of RAAS modulators with placebo. With regard to safety outcomes, ACEIs have a higher risk of cough (OR 4.68; 95% CI 1.61-13.60), ARBs have a higher risk of dizziness (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.06-1.91), hypotension (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.02-4.34), and hyperkalemia (OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.17-3.41), and MRAs had a higher risk of hyperkalemia (OR 2.68; 95% CI 1.99-3.62) when compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRAs were the only RAAS modulators with a survival benefit in adults with hypertension, although they carried a higher risk of hyperkalemia. Our data challenge current hypertension guidelines which recommend MRAs as fourth-line therapy, and suggest that MRAs should be prescribed earlier and more widely.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO identifier number CRD42023405714.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1445-1462"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142282126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Efgartigimod: A Review in Generalised Myasthenia Gravis.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02101-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02101-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Efgartigimod (Vyvgart^®; Vyvgart^® Hytrulo) is a neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonist indicated for the treatment of generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG) in adults who are acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody positive (Ab+). Efgartigimod is approved for both intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) use. In a pivotal phase III trial, IV efgartigimod was associated with significant and clinically meaningful improvements in myasthenia gravis symptoms and reductions in disease burden. The beneficial effects of IV efgartigimod were reproducible, durable and maintained over the long term. IV efgartigimod also improved health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In another phase III trial, SC efgartigimod PH20 was noninferior to IV efgartigimod in reducing total immunoglobulin G levels. Clinical improvement with SC efgartigimod PH20 was consistent with that of IV efgartigimod and was reproducible over the long term. Efgartigimod was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events were headache and infections (with IV efgartigimod) and injection-site reactions (with SC efgartigimod PH20). Although further long-term data are required, IV and SC formulations of efgartigimod provide effective, generally well-tolerated and flexible treatment options for adults with AChR Ab+ gMG.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1463-1474"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Orexin Receptor Antagonists for the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease and Associated Sleep Disorders.","authors":"Matteo Carpi, Nicola Biagio Mercuri, Claudio Liguori","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02096-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02096-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orexins/hypocretins are neuropeptides produced by the hypothalamic neurons, binding two G-protein coupled receptors (orexin 1 and orexin 2 receptors) and playing a critical role in regulating arousal, wakefulness, and various physiological functions. Given the high prevalence of sleep disturbances in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and their reported involvement in AD pathophysiology, the orexin system is hypothesized to contribute to the disease pathogenesis. Specifically, recent evidence suggests that orexin's influence may extend beyond sleep regulation, potentially affecting amyloid-β and tau pathologies. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), namely suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant, demonstrated efficacy in treating chronic insomnia disorder across diverse clinical populations. Considering their stabilizing effects on sleep parameters and emerging evidence of a possible neuroprotective role, these agents represent a promising strategy for AD management. This leading article reviews the potential use of orexin receptor antagonists in AD, particularly focusing on their effect in modulating disease-associated sleep disturbances and clinical outcomes. Overall, clinical studies support the use of DORAs to enhance sleep quality in patients with AD with comorbid sleep and circadian sleep-wake rhythm disorders. Preliminary results also suggest that these compounds might influence AD pathology, potentially affecting disease progression. Conversely, research on selective orexin receptor antagonists in AD is currently limited. Further investigation is needed to explore orexin antagonism not only as a symptomatic treatment for sleep disturbances, but also for its broader implications in modifying AD neurodegeneration, emphasizing mechanisms of action and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1365-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602839/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: Pleiotropic Cardiometabolic Effects and Add-on Value of a Combined Therapy.","authors":"André J Scheen","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02090-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02090-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have proven efficacy and safety in randomized clinical trials and observational real-life studies. Besides improving glucose control, reducing body weight, and lowering arterial blood pressure (surrogate endpoints), the breakthroughs were the demonstration of a significant reduction in cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk. GLP-1RAs reduce events linked to atherogenic cardiovascular disease (especially ischemic stroke) and also renal outcomes (FLOW trial with semaglutide), with a limited effect on heart failure. The most striking protective effects of SGLT2is were a marked reduction in hospitalization for heart failure and a remarkable reduced progression of chronic kidney disease. These benefits have been attributed to numerous pleiotropic effects beyond glucose-lowering action. Underlying mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular and renal protection are at least partially different between GLP-1RAs (mainly anti-atherogenic and vascular effects) and SGLT2is (mainly systemic and intrarenal hemodynamic changes). Thus, patients at high risk may benefit from complementary actions when being treated with a GLP-1RA/SGLT2i combination. Such combination has proven its efficacy on surrogate endpoints. Furthermore, post hoc subgroup analyses of cardiovascular outcome trials have suggested a greater cardiorenal protection in patients treated with a combination versus either monotherapy. The benefits of a combined therapy have been confirmed in a few retrospective cohort studies. A dedicated prospective trial comparing a combined therapy versus either monotherapy is ongoing (PRECIDENTD); however, several challenges still remain, especially the higher cost of a combined therapy and the worldwide underuse of either GLP-1RAs or SGLT2is in clinical practice, even in patients at high cardiorenal risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1347-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Vunakizumab: First Approval.","authors":"Susan J Keam","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02110-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02110-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vunakizumab (^®) is a subcutaneous (SC) recombinant anti-interleukin (IL)-17A humanized monoclonal IgG1/κ antibody being developed by Suzhou Suncadia Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd (a subsidiary of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd) for the systemic treatment of autoimmune diseases related to the IL-17 pathway, including psoriasis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. In August 2024, vunakizumab was approved in China for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who are suitable for systemic treatment or phototherapy. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of vunakizumab leading to this first approval for the systemic treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1481-1485"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Emerging Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"José Miguel Alvarenga, Thomas Bieber, Tiago Torres","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02095-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02095-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent inflammatory skin disease having a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Conventional treatments, including topical therapies and systemic immunosuppressants, often have limited efficacy and long-term safety concerns. Emerging biologic therapies target specific immune pathways implicated in AD pathogenesis, offering new therapeutic options in a disease known for its complex immune pathomechanisms. This review focuses on novel biologics under investigation, particularly those targeting specific immune pathways such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and OX40-OX40L axis. Interleukin-4 and IL-13 inhibitors aim to reduce Th2-driven inflammation, while IL-22 inhibitors focus on restoring skin barrier function. Interleukin-31 inhibitors help alleviate pruritus, a major symptom in AD. OX40-OX40L pathway inhibitors can selectively suppress the activity of pathogenic T cells, without inducing significant immunosuppression. Bispecific antibodies targeting both IL-4 and IL-31 pathways are emerging as potential dual-action treatment for AD. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitors offer a novel strategy to control inflammation. While many of these therapies offer promising safety and efficacy profiles, long-term studies and real-world data are essential to confirm their lasting impact. This review highlights the potential of these emerging systemic therapies to continue transforming AD management and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1394"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11602808/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Donanemab: First Approval.","authors":"Connie Kang","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02087-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02087-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Donanemab (donanemab-azbt; Kisunla^TM) is an amyloid β-directed antibody developed by Eli Lilly and Company for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Donanemab recently received approval in the USA for the treatment of adults with early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia stage of disease). This article summarizes the milestones in the development of donanemab leading to this first approval for Alzheimer's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1313-1318"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Targeting the Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Pathway: New Opportunities in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management.","authors":"Konstantina Kitsou, Georgios Kokkotis, Jesús Rivera-Nieves, Giorgos Bamias","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02094-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02094-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) are chronic immune-mediated diseases which primarily target the intestines. In recent years, the development and regulatory approval of various immunotherapies, both biological agents and small molecules, that target specific pathways of the IBD-associated inflammatory cascade have revolutionized the treatment of IBD. Small molecules offer the advantages of oral administration and short wash-out times. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive metabolite of ceramide, which exerts its functions after binding to five G-protein-coupled receptors (S1PR1-S1PR5). Concerning IBD, S1P participates in the egress of lymphocytes from the secondary lymphoid tissue and their re-circulation to sites of inflammation, mainly through S1PR1 binding. In addition, this system facilitates the differentiation of T-helper cells towards proinflammatory immunophenotypes. Recently, S1P modulators have offered a valuable addition to the IBD treatment armamentarium. They exert their anti-inflammatory function via sequestration of T cell subsets in the lymphoid tissues and prevention of gut homing. In this review, we revisit the role of the S1P/S1PR axis in the pathogenesis of IBD and discuss efficacy and safety data from clinical trials and real-world reports on the two S1PR modulators, ozanimod and etrasimod, that are currently approved for IBD treatment, and comment on their potential positioning in the IBD day-to-day management. We also present recent data on emerging S1P modulators. Finally, based on the successes and failures of S1PR modulators in IBD, we discuss future avenues of IBD treatments targeting the S1P/S1PR axis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1179-1197"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142343766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Impact of CYP2C19 Genotype Status on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease, Stroke, and Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Dominique P M S M Maas, Loes H Willems, Josephine Kranendonk, Cornelis Kramers, Michiel C Warlé","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02076-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02076-7","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Clopidogrel is widely used for the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemic stroke, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). CYP2C19 plays a pivotal role in the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite. Clopidogrel-treated carriers of a CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele (LOF) may have a higher risk of new atherothrombotic events. Previous studies on genotype-guided treatment were mainly performed in CAD and showed mixed results.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose: &lt;/strong&gt;To simultaneously investigate the impact of CYP2C19 genotype status on the rate of atherothrombotic events in the most common types of atherosclerotic disease (CAD, stroke, PAD).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A comprehensive search in Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE from their inception to July 23rd 2023 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing genotype-guided and standard antithrombotic treatment, and cohort studies and post hoc analyses of RCTs concerning the association between CYP2C19 genotype status and clinical outcomes in clopidogrel-treated patients were included. The primary efficacy endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the safety end point major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Forty-four studies were identified: 11 studies on CAD, 29 studies on stroke, and 4 studies on PAD. In CAD, genotype-guided therapy significantly reduced the risk of MACE [risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.43-0.83], myocardial infarction (RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.42-0.68), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.94), compared with standard antithrombotic treatment. The rate of major bleeding did not differ significantly (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.23). Most RCTs were performed in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (9/11). In stroke, LOF carriers had a significantly higher risk of MACE (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.25-2.08) and recurrent ischemic stroke (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.48-2.40) compared with non-carriers. No significant differences were found in major bleeding (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43-1.89). In the 6955 patients with symptomatic PAD treated with clopidogrel in the EUCLID trial, no differences in MACE or major bleeding were found between LOF carriers and non-carriers. In three smaller studies on patients with PAD treated with clopidogrel after endovascular therapy, CYP2C19 genotype status was significantly associated with atherothrombotic events.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Genotype-guided treatment significantly decreased the rate of atherothrombotic events in patients with CAD, especially after PCI. In patients with history of stroke, LOF carriers treated with clopidogrel had a higher risk of MACE and recurrent stroke. The available evidence in PAD with regard to major adverse limb events is too limited to draw meaningful conclusions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1275-1297"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512840/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142132153","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Travoprost Intracameral Implant Based on Pooled Analyses from Two Phase III Trials.","authors":"I Paul Singh, John P Berdahl, Steven R Sarkisian, Lilit A Voskanyan, Robert E Ang, Long V Doan, David Applegate, Yannan Shen, L Jay Katz, Angela C Kothe, Tomas Navratil","doi":"10.1007/s40265-024-02074-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40265-024-02074-9","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aim: &lt;/strong&gt;The purpose of this study was to conduct and interpret a pooled 12-month analysis of two prospective, multi-center, randomized, double-masked, controlled trials designed to assess the efficacy and safety of the travoprost intracameral implant (slow-eluting [SE] implant in development as a new therapeutic and fast-eluting [FE] implant included for masking purposes) in subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Subjects with OAG or OHT, on 0-3 intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications, baseline unmedicated mean diurnal IOP of ≥ 21 mmHg, and IOP ≤ 36 mmHg at each baseline diurnal timepoint, received either a travoprost implant and twice-daily (BID) placebo eye drops or BID timolol 0.5% eye drops and a sham procedure. Subjects were followed through 12 months and assessed for IOP, reduction in topical IOP-lowering medications, and safety parameters including treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). IOP at 8AM was prospectively collected at all study visits through 12 months and diurnal IOP, measured at 8AM, 10AM, and 4PM, was prospectively collected at baseline, day 10, week 6, and months 3 and 12.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 1150 subjects were randomized (385 FE implant, 380 SE implant, and 385 sham/timolol) across the two trials. Statistical non-inferiority to timolol and clinically relevant reductions in 8AM IOPs were demonstrated at month 12. In more detail, both implant groups demonstrated statistical non-inferiority to timolol and clinically relevant reductions from baseline in mean diurnal IOP at all visits over the 12-month evaluation period when diurnal IOP was collected. Additionally, both implant groups demonstrated robust treatment effect based on 8AM average IOP from day 10 through the specified visit which ranged from day 10 to month 12 from 6.9 to 8.5 mmHg in the FE implant group; 6.8 to 8.5 mmHg in the SE implant group; and 7.3 to 7.5 mmHg in the sham/timolol group. With regards to reduction in topical pharmacotherapy, at month 12, 77.6% of FE and 81.4% of SE implant eyes were completely free of all topical IOP-lowering medications and a significantly greater proportion of FE and SE implant eyes (89.9% and 93.0%) versus sham/timolol eyes (66.9%) were on the same or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications compared with pre-study (p &lt;  0.0001). Furthermore, of subjects on topical IOP medications at screening, a significantly greater proportion of FE implant (80.2%) and SE implant (85.1%) eyes versus sham/timolol (22.8%) eyes were on fewer topical IOP-lowering medications at month 12 compared with pre-study (p &lt;  0.0001). Lastly, of SE implant eyes on same or fewer topical IOP-lowering medications at month 12, the average through month 12 decreased by 0.9 medications, and of those SE implant eyes on fewer topical IOP-lowering medications compared with pre-study, the average through month 12 decreased by 1.4 medications. The most commo","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1299-1311"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512891/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}