States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships最新文献

‘Trusted friends, dynamic partners’: a modest but steadfast ASEAN–New Zealand strategic partnership “可信赖的朋友，有活力的伙伴”:谦虚而坚定的东盟-新西兰战略伙伴关系

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00028

L. Czechowska

引用次数: 0

The imitation game? The partnership between ASEAN and Canada in search of strategic relevance 模仿游戏?东盟与加拿大寻求战略相关性的伙伴关系

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00026

Bartosz Płotka

引用次数: 0

Strategic partnerships, international politics and IR theory 战略伙伴关系，国际政治，国际关系理论

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00010

Andriy Tyushka, L. Czechowska

{"title":"Strategic partnerships, international politics and IR theory","authors":"Andriy Tyushka, L. Czechowska","doi":"10.4337/9781788972284.00010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972284.00010","url":null,"abstract":"Strategic partnerships (SPs) constitute a novel form and feature of the evolving international relations system and represent a new principle for organizing international life. Seen broadly, strategic partnerships represent a type of special relationship and thus are not unique or new at all. However, should one take a closer look into the internal mechanics of the partnership phenomenon and explore its distinctive foreign-political functions from its changing geostrategic context, it becomes clear that with the reconfiguration of the international relations system since the early 1990s, strategic partnerships have become the necessary key to cope with systemic and issue-specific international challenges. It is difficult to trace the path back to the first strategic partnership formed post-1990. The problem is of both an empirical and analytical nature as there is still no consensus in the literature as to what elements constitute the idea of a strategic partnership and whether labelling a relationship as such is sufficient to regard bilateralism as a strategic partnership. Most authors who searched for the roots of the phenomenon contend that the agreement between US President Bill Clinton and Russian President Boris Yeltsin in 1994, which set forth ‘a new stage of mature strategic partnership based on equality, mutual advantage, and recognition of each other’s national interests’ (Moscow Declaration, 1994), encompasses the first of its kind (cf. e.g. Envall and Hall, 2016, p. 89; Michalski and Pan, 2017b, p. 13; Nadkarni, 2010, p. 46). However, the long abandoned strategic partnership between the US and Turkey, which was re-invigorated in early 2018, was in fact established in 1992. Brazil and China forged their strategic partnership in 1993. Thus, at least two other partnerships of this kind were in place before the 1994 US–Russian deal was struck. Since 1993, when China made its first strategic partnership with Brazil, and by 2014 China had forged close to 70 strategic partnerships","PeriodicalId":113365,"journal":{"name":"States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129874950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

The beginning of a new Cold War? The failure of the NATO–Russia strategic partnership 新冷战的开始?北约-俄罗斯战略伙伴关系的失败

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00016

Joanna Piechowiak-Lamparska

引用次数: 2

Together we CAN! . . . or CAN’T? A struggling détente between the Andean Community and Chile and (lost) opportunities of a strategic partnership 我们一起可以!……还是不能?安第斯共同体和智利之间的艰难关系和(失去的)战略伙伴关系的机会

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00032

Bartłomiej Różycki

引用次数: 0

The development vs. geo-economics nexus in the CAN–China interactionism 中国—中国互动主义中的发展与地缘经济关系

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00030

Andriy Tyushka

引用次数: 0

An evolving NATO–Ukraine strategic partnership in a turbulent security environment 在动荡的安全环境中不断发展的北约-乌克兰战略伙伴关系

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00018

Andriy Tyushka

引用次数: 0

The long and winding road to strategic partnership: the NATO–Japan relations 通往战略伙伴关系的漫长曲折之路:北约-日本关系

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00017

Agata Domachowska

引用次数: 0

A marriage of convenience? The EU–India reluctant strategic partnership 权宜婚姻?欧盟-印度不情愿的战略伙伴关系

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00021

L. Czechowska

引用次数: 1

Between cooperation and competition: the strategic partnership between the European Union and the US 合作与竞争之间:欧盟与美国的战略伙伴关系

States, International Organizations and Strategic Partnerships Pub Date : 2019-07-26 DOI: 10.4337/9781788972284.00020

Karolina Gawron-Tabor

引用次数: 0