Diabetologia最新文献

{"title":"Up Front","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06361-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06361-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143026393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Glucose Lowering through Weight management (GLoW): a randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a diabetes education and behavioural weight management programme vs a diabetes education programme in adults with a recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes","authors":"Julia Mueller, Penny Breeze, Francesco Fusco, Stephen J. Sharp, Katharine Pidd, Alan Brennan, Andrew J. Hill, Stephen Morris, Carly A. Hughes, Sarah E. Bates, Daniel Pollard, Jenny Woolston, Emma Lachassseigne, Marie Stubbings, Fiona Whittle, Rebecca A. Jones, Clare E. Boothby, Robbie Duschinsky, Jennifer Bostock, Nazrul Islam, Simon J. Griffin, Amy L. Ahern","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06355-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06355-6","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>UK standard care for type 2 diabetes is structured diabetes education, with no effects on HbA<sub>1c</sub>, small, short-term effects on weight and low uptake. We evaluated whether remotely delivered tailored diabetes education combined with commercial behavioural weight management is cost-effective compared with current standard care in helping people with type 2 diabetes to lower their blood glucose, lose weight, achieve remission and improve cardiovascular risk factors.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a pragmatic, randomised, parallel two-group trial. Participants were adults (≥18 years) with overweight or obesity (BMI≥25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (≤3 years), recruited from 159 primary care practices in England. We randomised participants to a tailored diabetes education and behavioural weight management programme (DEW; delivered by Weight Watchers) or to current standard care diabetes education (DE; Diabetes Education and Self Management for Ongoing and Newly Diagnosed [DESMOND] programme), using a computer-generated randomisation sequence in a 1:1 allocation stratified by gender and diabetes duration, unknown to those collecting and analysing the data. Participants could not be blinded due to the nature of the interventions. Participants completed assessments at 0, 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome was 12 month change from baseline in HbA<sub>1c</sub>. We also assessed bodyweight, blood pressure, cholesterol (total, HDL, LDL), glucose-lowering medication, behavioural measures (physical activity, food intake), psychosocial measures (eating behaviour, diabetes-related quality of life, wellbeing) and within-trial and modelled lifetime cost effectiveness.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We randomised 577 participants (DEW: 289, DE: 288); 398 (69%) completed 12 month follow-up. We found no evidence for an intervention effect on change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> from baseline to 12 months (difference: −0.84 [95% CI −2.99, 1.31] mmol/mol, <i>p</i>=0.44) or 6 months (−1.83 [−4.05, 0.40] mmol/mol). We found an intervention effect on weight at 6 (−1.77 [−2.86, −0.67] kg) and 12 months (−1.38 [−2.56, −0.19] kg). Participants in DEW had a higher likelihood of achieving diabetes remission than participants in DE (6 months: RR 2.10 [95% CI 1.03, 4.47]; 12 months: RR 2.53 [1.30, 5.16]). DEW was cost-effective compared with DE in within-trial and lifetime analyses, in the latter generating an incremental cost effectiveness ratio of £2290 per quality-adjusted life year gained.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>A commercial behavioural weight management programme combined with remote dietary counselling after diagnosis of type 2 diabetes did not improve HbA<sub>1c</sub> up to 12 months post intervention in this trial. The intervention could help people achieve weight loss","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"108 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143026689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Active targeting of type 1 diabetes therapies to pancreatic beta cells using nanocarriers","authors":"Jillian Collins, Nikki L. Farnsworth","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06356-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06356-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease characterised by the destruction of pancreatic beta cells, resulting in lifelong insulin dependence. Although exogenous insulin can maintain glycaemic control, this approach does not protect residual or replacement pancreatic beta cells from immune-mediated death. Current therapeutics designed to protect functional beta cell mass or promote beta cell proliferation and regeneration can have off-target effects, resulting in higher dose requirements and adverse side effects. Targeted drug delivery using nanocarriers has demonstrated potential for overcoming these limitations. The critical bottleneck limiting the development of beta cell-targeted therapies is a lack of highly specific beta cell markers. This review provides an overview of the use of nanocarriers for cell-targeted delivery and the current state of the field of beta cell targeting. Technologies such as systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) aptamer selection, phage display screening, and omics datasets from human samples are highlighted as tools to identify novel beta cell-specific targets that can be combined with nanocarriers for targeted delivery of therapeutics. Ultimately, beta cell-targeted therapies using nanocarriers present a unique opportunity to develop tailored treatments for each stage of type 1 diabetes with the goal of providing individuals with treatment options that prevent further progression or reverse the course of the disease.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143020556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Targeting ultra-processed foods for prevention of type 2 diabetes: state of the evidence and future directions","authors":"Kenny Mendoza, Simón Barquera, Deirdre K. Tobias","doi":"10.1007/s00125-025-06358-x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-025-06358-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The incidence of type 2 diabetes has risen globally, in parallel with the obesity epidemic and environments promoting a sedentary lifestyle and low-quality diet. There has been scrutiny of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) as a driver of type 2 diabetes, underscored by their increasing availability and intake worldwide, across countries of all incomes. This narrative review addresses the accumulated evidence from investigations of the trends in UPF consumption and the relationship with type 2 diabetes incidence. Hypotheses for why UPFs may be causally implicated in the initiation and progression of weight gain and suboptimal blood glucose levels are varied. There is also uncertainty and debate about whether detrimental effects of UPFs could be owing to additives and other features of industrial processing, independent of established dietary risk factors, namely added sugar, sodium, saturated fat and low fibre content. However, these current research gaps are addressable with rigorous research and coordinated efforts across nutrition-science domains; for example, the strengths of longitudinal cohort studies can be leveraged to refine the characterisation of key UPF subcategories within the enormous and diverse category of UPFs and ultra-processed beverages, and to identify high-risk patterns of intake that are related to the development of chronic-disease outcomes. The notable advantages of dietary intervention studies are the critical gains in the reliability of dietary assessments, and isolating the effects of individual UPF additives and features through carefully formulated diets. Research improving our understanding of the modifiable food environment, the diet’s causal drivers of weight gain and suboptimal cardiometabolic health, and the interactions among them, can be used to meaningfully shift the food supply for large-scale improvements in health. Thus, although the global market share of UPFs seems to outpace the research on its detrimental health effects, leaving the scientific community with the responsibility of generating proof, there may still be promising opportunities to reduce the burden of type 2 diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142988909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-weekly semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes: the COMBINE 2 randomised clinical trial","authors":"Ildiko Lingvay, Malik Benamar, Liming Chen, Ariel Fu, Esteban Jódar, Tomoyuki Nishida, Jean-Pierre Riveline, Daisuke Yabe, Thomas Zueger, Rosângela Réa","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06348-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06348-5","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Aims/hypothesis&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;COMBINE 2 assessed the efficacy and safety of once-weekly IcoSema (a combination therapy of basal insulin icodec and semaglutide) vs once-weekly semaglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue) 1.0 mg in individuals with type 2 diabetes inadequately managed with GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy, with or without additional oral glucose-lowering medications.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;This 52 week, randomised, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, Phase IIIa trial was conducted across 121 sites in 13 countries/regions. Adults with type 2 diabetes (HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; 53.0–85.8 mmol/mol [7.0–10.0%]) receiving GLP-1 RA therapy with or without additional oral glucose-lowering medications were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-weekly IcoSema or once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg. The primary endpoint was change in HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; from baseline to week 52; superiority of IcoSema to semaglutide 1.0 mg was assessed. Secondary endpoints included change in fasting plasma glucose and body weight (baseline to week 52), and combined clinically significant (level 2; &lt;3.0 mmol/l) or severe (level 3; associated with severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycaemia (baseline to week 57).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Overall, 683 participants were randomised using a Randomisation and Trial Supply Management system to IcoSema (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;=342) or semaglutide 1.0 mg (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt;=341). Mean ± SD baseline characteristics were as follows: HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; 64.0±8.2 mmol/mol (8.0±0.7%); diabetes duration 12.6±6.9 years; and BMI 31.1±4.7 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;. From baseline to week 52, mean change in HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; was −14.7 mmol/mol (−1.35%-points) in the IcoSema group and −9.88 mmol/mol (−0.90%-points) in the semaglutide group; the estimated treatment difference (ETD) was –4.85 (95% CI −6.13, −3.57) mmol/mol (−0.44 [95% CI −0.56, −0.33]%-points), confirming superiority of IcoSema to semaglutide (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.0001). The estimated mean change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 52 was statistically significantly reduced with IcoSema vs semaglutide (−2.48 mmol/l vs −1.43 mmol/l, respectively; ETD −1.05 [95% CI −1.36, −0.75] mmol; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.0001). Mean change in body weight from baseline to week 52 was statistically significantly different between groups: +0.84 kg for IcoSema vs −3.70 kg for semaglutide (ETD 4.54 kg [95% CI 3.84, 5.23]; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;&lt;0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia between IcoSema and semaglutide (0.042 vs 0.036 episodes per person-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 1.20 [95% CI 0.53, 2.69]; &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt;=0.66). The proportion of participants experiencing gastrointestinal adverse events was similar between treatment groups (IcoSema 31.4%; semaglutide 34.4%).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Conclu","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142987221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Monounsaturated fatty acids from plant or animal sources and risk of type 2 diabetes in three large prospective cohorts of men and women","authors":"Zhangling Chen, Frank Qian, Binkai Liu, Geng Zong, Yanping Li, Frank B. Hu, Qi Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06353-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06353-8","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Existing evidence on the relationship between intake of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and type 2 diabetes is conflicting. Few studies have examined whether MUFAs from plant or animal sources (MUFA-Ps and MUFA-As, respectively) exhibit differential associations with type 2 diabetes. We examined associations of intakes of total MUFAs, MUFA-Ps and MUFA-As with type 2 diabetes risk.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We used data from 51,290 women in the Nurses’ Health Study (1990–2016), 61,703 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II (1991–2017) and 29,497 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1990–2016). Using food frequency questionnaires and food composition tables, we calculated MUFA-P and MUFA-A intakes every 4 years and modelled their associations with type 2 diabetes using Cox regression models.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>During 3,268,512 person-years of follow-up, we documented 13,211 incident type 2 diabetes cases. After multivariate adjustment, total MUFA intake was associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk, with HR for Q5 vs Q1 of 1.10 (95% CI 1.01, 1.22). MUFA-Ps and MUFA-As demonstrated divergent associations, with HRs of 0.87 (95% CI 0.81, 0.94) and 1.34 (1.23, 1.45), respectively. In substitution analyses, HRs were 0.92 (95% CI 0.86, 0.99) for replacing 2% of energy from trans fatty acids or 0.72 (0.66, 0.78) and 0.82 (0.77, 0.88) for replacing 5% from MUFA-As and 5% from the sum of saturated fatty acids and MUFA-As with MUFA-Ps, respectively. Substituting MUFA-As for saturated fatty acids and refined carbohydrates was associated with a 43% and 33% higher risk, respectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>Higher intake of MUFA-Ps was associated with lower type 2 diabetes risk, whereas increased intake of MUFA-As was associated with higher risk. Replacing saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids and MUFA-As with MUFA-Ps may be beneficial for type 2 diabetes prevention.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142974556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sugar-sweetened or artificially sweetened beverage consumption, physical activity and risk of type 2 diabetes in US adults","authors":"Lorena S. Pacheco, Deirdre K. Tobias, Danielle E. Haslam, Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier, Yanping Li, Shilpa N. Bhupathiraju, Walter C. Willett, David S. Ludwig, Cara B. Ebbeling, Frank B. Hu, Marta Guasch-Ferré","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06351-w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06351-w","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Aims/hypothesis&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;A positive association between sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and diabetes risk has been shown, with inconsistent evidence between artificially sweetened beverages (ASBs) and diabetes. Moreover, it is uncertain if physical activity can mitigate the negative effects of these beverages on diabetes development. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the independent and joint associations between SSB or ASB consumption and physical activity on the risk of type 2 diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;We followed 64,029 women in the Nurses’ Health Study (1980–2016), 88,340 women in the Nurses’ Health Study II (1991–2017) and 39,436 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986–2016). SSB and ASB consumption was calculated from food-frequency questionnaires administered every 4 years, while physical activity data were collected biennially. A validated supplementary questionnaire on diabetes symptoms, diagnostic tests and treatment confirmed type 2 diabetes cases. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate HRs and 95% CIs for developing type 2 diabetes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;During 5,105,351 person-years of follow-up, we recorded 19,940 new cases of type 2 diabetes. Compared with those who never or rarely consumed SSBs or ASBs, those who consumed ≥2 servings/day had a 41% (HR 1.41 [95% CI 1.33, 1.50]) and 11% (HR 1.11 [95% CI 1.07, 1.16]) higher risk of type 2 diabetes, respectively. For participants meeting physical activity guidelines (≥7.5 metabolic equivalent of task [MET] h/week) and consuming ≥2 servings/week of SSBs or ASBs, the risk was 22% (HR 1.22 [95% CI 1.15, 1.29]) and 7% (HR 1.07 [95% CI 1.02, 1.12]) higher, respectively, compared with those who met physical activity guidelines and never or rarely (&lt;1 serving/month) consumed these beverages. For participants meeting the physical activity guidelines and consuming 1–4 servings/month of SSBs, there was a 9% (HR 1.09 [95% CI 1.02, 1.15]) higher risk of type 2 diabetes. Compared with the reference group (those who met physical activity guidelines and consumed &lt;1 SSB serving/month), adults who did not meet physical activity guidelines (&lt;7.5 MET h/week) and who never or rarely (&lt;1 serving/month) consumed SSBs, had 1–4 SSB servings/month, or had ≥2 SSB servings/week, the HRs (95% CIs) were 1.22 (1.13, 1.31), 1.28 (1.20, 1.37), and 1.51 (1.43, 1.61), respectively. Similarly, for ASB consumption, adults who did not meet physical activity guidelines and who never or rarely (&lt;1 serving/month) consumed ASBs, had 1–4 servings/month, or had ≥2 servings/week, the HRs (95% CIs) were 1.21 (1.14, 1.28), 1.21 (1.13, 1.30), and 1.30 (1.23, 1.37) compared with the reference group (who met physical activity guidelines and consumed &lt;1 ASB serving/month).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\"&gt;Conclusions/interpretation&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even when in","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142935822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Eating disorders among people with and without type 1 diabetes: incidence and treatment in a nationwide population-based cohort","authors":"Leon Hirvelä, Jari Haukka, Anna Keski-Rahkonen, Pyry N. Sipilä","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06346-7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-024-06346-7","url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims/hypothesis</h3><p>Eating disorders are over-represented in type 1 diabetes and are associated with an increased risk of complications, but it is unclear whether type 1 diabetes affects the treatment of eating disorders. We assessed incidence and treatment of eating disorders in a nationwide sample of individuals with type 1 diabetes and diabetes-free control individuals.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Our study comprised 11,055 individuals aged &lt;30 who had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in 1998–2010, and 11,055 diabetes-free control individuals matched for age, sex and hospital district. We ascertained incidence of eating disorders from hospital records using Poisson regression. Eating disorder treatment was assessed by new prescriptions for psychotropic medications and hospital treatment for eating disorders.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>During a mean follow-up of 13.1 years, there were 175 incident cases of eating disorders among individuals with type 1 diabetes and 75 among the control individuals (adjusted incidence rate ratio 2.35; 95% CI 1.80, 3.09). The prescription of psychotropic medications was similar among eating disorder patients with and without type 1 diabetes. However, those with type 1 diabetes received outpatient hospital treatment for their eating disorder less often than those without diabetes (mean 3.32 vs 5.33 outpatient care visits per year [adjusted difference 1.24; 95% CI 0.39, 2.08]).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions/interpretation</h3><p>People with type 1 diabetes are more likely to be diagnosed with eating disorders than their diabetes-free peers. However, they receive less outpatient hospital treatment for their eating disorders despite their greater risk for major adverse health outcomes. These findings emphasise the need for targeted eating disorder treatment for people with type 1 diabetes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical Abstract</h3>\u0000","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142925120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Addressing methodological considerations in the assessment of the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists on risk of diabetic eye complications.","authors":"Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Nefertiti OjiNjideka Hemphill, Tobias Kurth","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06300-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00125-024-06300-7","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":"247-248"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A modified total body water deficit formula for use in diabetes care.","authors":"Philip J G M Voets","doi":"10.1007/s00125-024-06311-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00125-024-06311-4","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":11164,"journal":{"name":"Diabetologia","volume":" ","pages":"243-244"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544320","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}