11th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop (SSW 11)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Intelligibility and naturalness of articulatory synthesis with VocalTractLab compared to established speech synthesis technologies 与现有的语音合成技术相比,VocalTractLab的发音合成的可理解性和自然性
11th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop (SSW 11) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.21437/ssw.2021-18
P. K. Krug, Simon Stone, P. Birkholz
{"title":"Intelligibility and naturalness of articulatory synthesis with VocalTractLab compared to established speech synthesis technologies","authors":"P. K. Krug, Simon Stone, P. Birkholz","doi":"10.21437/ssw.2021-18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21437/ssw.2021-18","url":null,"abstract":"In this work, the current state-of-the-art of articulatory speech synthesis (VOCALTRACTLAB) is compared to a wide range of different text-to-speech systems that once represented or still represent the continuously evolving state-of-the-art of speech synthesis technology. The comparison systems include neural and concatenative synthesis by Google and Microsoft, as well as Hidden Markov Model-based, unit-selection and diphone synthesis developed at universities (using MARYTTS, MBROLA and DRESS). A small corpus of 15 German sentences was synthesized using the text-to-speech (and, if available, re-synthesis) functionalities of each system. The intelligibility of the synthesized utterances was evaluated in an ASR experiment. The naturalness of the utterances was evaluated in a multi-stimulus Likert test by 50 German native speakers. As an additional reference, recordings of natural speech were used in the experiments. It was found that the articulatory synthesis can achieve a performance on par with the non-commercial synthesis systems in terms of intelligibility and naturalness, while being significantly outperformed by the commercial synthesis systems.","PeriodicalId":106906,"journal":{"name":"11th ISCA Speech Synthesis Workshop (SSW 11)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126425894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书