Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
[Not available online] Theory of Myth versus Meta-theory of Myth: On the Political Implications of a Late Twentieth-Century Distinction 神话理论与神话元理论:论二十世纪后期差异的政治含义
Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI: 10.1163/9789004435025_012
Angus Nicholls
{"title":"[Not available online] Theory of Myth versus Meta-theory of Myth: On the Political Implications of a Late Twentieth-Century Distinction","authors":"Angus Nicholls","doi":"10.1163/9789004435025_012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435025_012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":106459,"journal":{"name":"Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth","volume":"86 S23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132418679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Understanding Religion: Interpretation and Explanation 理解宗教:诠释与解释
Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI: 10.1163/9789004435025_004
{"title":"Understanding Religion: Interpretation and Explanation","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/9789004435025_004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435025_004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":106459,"journal":{"name":"Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130172782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Millenarian Myth Ethnocentrized: The Case of East Asian New Religious Movements 民族中心化的千年神话:以东亚新兴宗教运动为例
Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI: 10.1163/9789004435025_017
R. Segal
{"title":"The Millenarian Myth Ethnocentrized: The Case of East Asian New Religious Movements","authors":"R. Segal","doi":"10.1163/9789004435025_017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435025_017","url":null,"abstract":"Robert A. Segal defines “myth” succinctly as a story—related to “personalities” either qua “agents or the objects of actions”—which “accomplishes something significant for adherents” (2015: 3–5). In the given sense, there is one particular story that many religious traditions embrace at their core, which I would like to call the “myth of the millennium.” This paper takes into focus a specific coloring of the myth that is salient particularly among East Asian new religious movements (NRMs); that is to say, the millenarian myth espoused by East Asian NRMs is more often than not articulated in ethnocentric terms. This paper will comparatively delineate various ethnocentrized manifestations of the myth in East Asian new religiosity. Before I start outlining selected cases, several terms need to be clarified— “East Asia,” “NRM,” “millenarianism” and “millennium,” as well as “ethnocentrism.” As I have argued elsewhere (Pokorny and Winter 2018: 4–6), from the perspective of Cultural Studies, I understand “East Asia” as “the part of Asia whose socio-cultural anatomy is conspicuously characterised” by the Chinese discursive archive “inscribed through a millennia-long unfolding process in substantial parts of today’s nation-states of China and Taiwan, Japan, South and North Korea, and Vietnam.” “NRMs” are religious communities that have emerged institutionally distinct since the early or mid-nineteenth century, a time when—larger in numbers than ever before—“novel religious programmes were devised inhaling a transformative spirit moulded by the surrounding discourse and the new paradigm of (unfolding) modernity,” marked by industrialization, colonialism, and glocalization (ibid.: 7). My use of “millenarianism” draws upon the definition offered by Catherine Wessinger (2011: 5), and is, like any other Religious Studies definition of millenarianism, indebted to Norman Cohn (2004: 13). It is the vision of a salvational transformation of the current world order, through which (at least) the faithful will experience well-being. The change will (substantially) come to fruition imminently and in accordance with a transcendent blueprint, either laid out by a superhu-","PeriodicalId":106459,"journal":{"name":"Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126033898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
The Permeable Boundary between Christian Anti-Judaism and Secular Antisemitism 基督教反犹太教与世俗反犹太主义之间的渗透边界
Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI: 10.1163/9789004435025_010
{"title":"The Permeable Boundary between Christian Anti-Judaism and Secular Antisemitism","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/9789004435025_010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435025_010","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":106459,"journal":{"name":"Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131619960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Myth, Synchronicity, and the Physical World 神话,同步性和物质世界
Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI: 10.1163/9789004435025_014
Roderick Main
{"title":"Myth, Synchronicity, and the Physical World","authors":"Roderick Main","doi":"10.1163/9789004435025_014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435025_014","url":null,"abstract":"In his extensive work on the theories of myth, Robert Segal makes a broad distinction between nineteenth-century theories, which saw myths as primitive attempts to explain the physical world and hence as now superseded by modern science, and twentieth-century theories of myth, which saw myths as serving other purposes than explanation of the physical world and hence as not necessarily incompatible with modern science. Segal suggests that the challenge for twenty-first century theories of myth is to find ways of seeing myths as explanatory of the physical world in a way that is also compatible with modern science. The present chapter focuses on one such approach that Segal discusses: Carl Gustav Jung’s psychological theory of myth when it is allied with his concept of synchronicity. After clarifying the criteria that need to be satisfied for, in Segal’s phrase, ‘bringing myth back to the world’, the chapter critically examines Segal’s own assessment of the Jungian approach in light of this challenge.","PeriodicalId":106459,"journal":{"name":"Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129991412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reductionism in Retrospect: Assessing Robert Segal’s “In Defense of Reductionism” (1983) Almost Four Decades On 回顾还原论:评价罗伯特·西格尔的《为还原论辩护》(1983)
Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI: 10.1163/9789004435025_003
{"title":"Reductionism in Retrospect: Assessing Robert Segal’s “In Defense of Reductionism” (1983) Almost Four Decades On","authors":"","doi":"10.1163/9789004435025_003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004435025_003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":106459,"journal":{"name":"Explaining, Interpreting, and Theorizing Religion and Myth","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128119433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信