Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®最新文献

{"title":"Is a Three-component Video-based Version of the Foot Posture Index Valid for Assessing Pediatric Patients With Orthopaedic and Neurologic Foot Conditions?","authors":"Susan A Rethlefsen, Sylvia Ounpuu, Jennifer Rodriguez-MacClintic, Alison Hanson, Eva M Ciccodicola, Kristan A Pierz, Tishya A L Wren","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003110","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003110","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Foot Posture Index-6 (FPI6) is an assessment of foot position that can be useful for patients with orthopaedic complaints. The FPI6 rates six components of foot position from -2 to +2, resulting in a total score on a continuum between -12 (severe cavus or supination) to +12 (severe planus or pronation). The subscores are ratings made by the examiner and are subjective assessments of deformity severity. The FPI6 requires palpation of bony structures around the foot and therefore must be administered live during physical examination. Because it is sometimes impractical to perform these assessments live, such as for retrospective research, a valid and reliable video-based tool would be very useful.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>This study examines a version of the FPI using three of the original six components to determine: (1) Are scores from the three-component version of the FPI (FPI3) associated with those from the original six-component version (FPI6)? (2) Is the three-component FPI3 as reliable as the original six-component FPI6? (3) Are FPI3 assessments done retrospectively from video as reliable as those done live?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective group of 155 participants (106 males; mean age 13 ± 4 years) was studied. All had undergone gait analysis including videotaping and in-person assessment using the FPI6. Ratings for three components (calcaneus inversion/eversion, medial arch congruence, and forefoot abduction/adduction) were extracted yielding an FPI3 score ranging from -6 to +6. The other three components of the FPI6 (talar head palpation, curves above and below the lateral malleolus, talonavicular joint bulge) were excluded from the FPI3. FPI6 and FPI3 scores and side-to-side asymmetry were compared for all participants and for diagnosis subgroups (cerebral palsy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease) using a Pearson correlation. Agreement for foot posture categorization between the FPI6 and FPI3 was assessed using weighted kappa. Intra- and interrater reliability of live and video-based assessments for the FPI3 and its components were examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Scores from the FPI3 and FPI6 are highly associated with each other, suggesting the FPI3 is an adequate substitute for the FPI6. FPI6 and FPI3 scores (r = 0.98) and asymmetry (r = 0.96) were highly correlated overall and within the cerebral palsy (r = 0.98 for scores; r = 0.98 for asymmetry) and Charcot-Marie-Tooth (r = 0.96 for scores; r = 0.90 for asymmetry) subgroups (all p < 0.001). Agreement between the FPI6 and FPI3 was high for foot posture categorization (weighted agreement = 95%, weighted κ = 0.88; p < 0.001). Interrater reliability for live ratings was similar for FPI3 and FPI6 and high for both measures (ICC = 0.95 for FPI6 and 0.94 for FPI3; both p < 0.001). High reliability was seen in video versus live ratings for","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"2063-2071"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469832/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141283117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Osteotomy Site Venting Enhances Femoral Bone Consolidation With Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails.","authors":"Roy Gigi, Yehuda Weil, Eyal Amar, Amit Sigal, Dror Ovadia, John E Herzenberg, Eitan Segev","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003119","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Magnetic intramedullary lengthening nailing has demonstrated benefits over external fixation devices for femoral bone lengthening. These include avoiding uncomfortable external fixation and associated pin site infections, scarring, and inhibition of muscle or joint function. Despite this, little has changed in the field of biologically enhanced bone regeneration. Venting the femoral intramedullary canal at the osteotomy site before reaming creates egress for bone marrow during reaming. The reamings that are extruded from vent holes may function as a prepositioned bone graft at the distraction gap. The relationship between venting and the consolidation of regenerating bone remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Do bone marrow reamings extruded through venting holes enhance the quality of bone regeneration and improve healing indices and consolidation times? (2) Is venting associated with a higher proportion of complications than nonventing?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study of femoral lengthening performed at one hospital from December 2012 to February 2022 using a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail with or without venting at the osteotomy site before reaming. This was a generally sequential series, in which the study groups were assembled as follows: Venting was performed between July 2012 and August 2016 and again from November 2021 onward. Nonventing was used between October 2016 and October 2021 because the senior author opted to create drill holes after the reaming procedure to avoid commitment to the osteotomy level before completing the reaming procedure. Outcomes were evaluated based on bone healing time, time to achieve full weightbearing, and complications. Sixty-one femoral lengthening procedures were studied (in 33 male and 28 female patients); two patients were excluded because of implant breakage. The mean age was 17 ± 5 years. The mean amount of lengthening was 55 ± 13 mm in the venting group and 48 ± 16 mm in the nonventing group (mean difference 7 ± 21 [95% CI 2 to 12]; p = 0.07). The healing index was defined as the time (in days) required for three cortices to bridge with new bone formation divided by the length (in cm) lengthened during the clinical protocol. This index signifies the bone formation rate achieved under the specific conditions of the protocol. Full weightbearing was allowed upon bridging the regenerated gap on three sides. Consolidation time was defined as the total number of days from the completion of the lengthening phase until adequate bone union (all three cortices healed) was achieved and full weightbearing was permitted. This time frame represents the entire healing process after the lengthening is complete divided by the amount of lengthening achieved (in cm). Patient follow-up was conducted meticulously at our institution, and we adhered to a precise schedule, occurring every 2 weeks during the distraction pha","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"2075-2085"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469821/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141283118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?","authors":"Zhendong Zhang, Nannan Cheng, Haigang Jia, Hui Cheng, Yue Song, Ningtao Ren, Yong Li, Dianzhong Luo, Hong Zhang","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003150","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003150","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the implications of either nonoperative or operative treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) performed before periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is critical to counseling patients and their families. There are limited studies, however, on PAO for the treatment of residual DDH after surgical intervention during childhood, and even less information about PAO after prior nonoperative treatment.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>We analyzed patients who had undergone PAO for DDH and asked: Did patients with prior childhood treatment (either operative or nonoperative) (1) improve less in modified Harris hip score (mHHS), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) score, or WOMAC score; (2) demonstrate more severe preoperative deformities; and (3) receive less complete radiographic correction and have more frequent complications than did patients whose hips had not undergone prior treatment? We also asked: (4) Were there subgroup differences among patients with DDH treated nonoperatively versus operatively before PAO in these same functional and radiographic parameters?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2011 and December 2020, a total of 90 PAOs were performed in 82 patients who had prior surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Of those, 3 patients (3 hips) with neuromuscular diseases were excluded, 4 patients (5 hips) were excluded for having received treatment after childhood, 7 hips that had undergone bilateral PAOs were excluded, and another 4 patients (4 hips) were lost to follow-up before the minimum study period of 2 years, leaving 71 patients (71 hips) for analysis (the previous treatment group). Among these, 32 patients had a history of previous surgery (the previous surgery group), and 39 patients had prior nonsurgical treatment (such as a Pavlik harness, closed reduction, spica casting) (the previous nonoperative group). During the same period, 1109 PAOs were performed in 956 patients who had no history of previous hip treatment. Following a 1:2 ratio, 142 patients (142 hips) were selected as the control group by matching for age (within 2 years difference), year of surgery (same year), and follow-up time (within 1-year difference). The patient characteristics for both the previous treatment group and the control group exhibited comparability, with mean ± SD follow-up durations of 49 ± 23 months and 48 ± 19 months, respectively. Within the previous 5 years, 3 patients (8%) in the previous nonoperative group, 4 patients (13%) in the previous surgery group, and 15 patients (11%) in the control group had not attended follow-up visits. We compared hip function and radiographic results between the two groups and performed a subgroup analysis between the previous surgery group and the previous nonoperative group. Hip function was assessed using the mHHS questionnaire, the WOMAC, and the iHOT-12 with attention to the minimum clinically important differences of these too","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1987-1996"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469904/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141449899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"CORR Insights®: Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?","authors":"Melissa Allen","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003200","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1997-2000"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469831/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Residency Diary: Tranq.","authors":"Lisa G M Friedman","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003211","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003211","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1946-1947"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469826/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Conversation With … Ayoung An (Anna Arietti), Luthier, About Craft and Performance.","authors":"Seth S Leopold","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003219","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003219","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1915-1918"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469815/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142307254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ultrasound-guided Hydrogel Injection Provides Better Therapeutic Effects After Hand Tendon Surgery Than Intraoperative Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Weiguang Yin, Xuanzhe Liu, Kai Wang, Li Shen, Yuange Li, Qianying Cai, Shengbao Chen, Jie Chen, Shen Liu","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003144","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003144","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hydrogels are used to provide a barrier against peritendinous adhesion formation, but when implanted intraoperatively, they degrade rapidly and aggravate early inflammatory pain. It is uncertain whether clinical efficacy can be improved by avoiding the inflammatory phase when hydrogels are delivered during adhesion formation.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Compared with intraoperative hydrogel application, does ultrasound-guided postoperative application result in better total active motion (TAM) at 12 months after tendon injury? (2) Does ultrasound-guided postoperative application of hydrogels result in lower pain, better function, and better satisfaction?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This open-label, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted by reparative and reconstructive surgeons at the National Orthopedics Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Between May 2021 and December 2022, 53% (168 of 317) of patients who met our inclusion criteria were recruited, and 47% (149 of 317) of patients were excluded because of the exclusion criteria. Finally, 84 patients were randomized to the postoperative group to receive ultrasound-guided carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) hydrogel delayed injection, and 84 patients were randomized to the intraoperative group to receive CMC hydrogel intraoperative application. Another 8% (7 of 84) of patients in the postoperative group and 10% (8 of 84) of patients in the intraoperative group were lost before the minimum study follow-up time of 1 year or had incomplete datasets, leaving 91% (153 of 168) of patients with data for analysis. Data on outcome events were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who underwent randomization. Follow-up visits were completed at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after tendon repair. The primary outcome was TAM (ie, the sum of the degrees of active metacarpophalangeal joint, proximal interphalangeal joint, and distal interphalangeal joint flexion less the degrees from full extension; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 20°) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included pain (measured with a VAS; range 0 to 10, a higher score indicating worse pain; MCID 0.6), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire activities of daily living (MHQ-ADL) score (range 0 to 100, a higher score indicating better outcomes; MCID 10.1), and MHQ satisfaction (MHQ-SAT) score (range 0 to 100, a higher score indicating better outcomes; MCID 33.0).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, the ultrasound-guided postoperative injection group had improved TAM (intraoperative 189° [95% CI 179° to 199°] versus postoperative 209° [95% CI 199° to 219°], mean difference 20° [95% CI 6° to 35°]; p = 0.006; the mean difference in the primary outcome fulfilled the MCID value at all time points). At 6 weeks, we found no clinically important difference in VAS pa","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"2017-2027"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469842/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141598790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What Are the Sex-Based Differences of Acetabular Coverage Features in Hip Dysplasia?","authors":"Hiroto Funahashi, Yusuke Osawa, Yasuhiko Takegami, Hiroki Iida, Yuto Ozawa, Hiroaki Ido, Shiro Imagama","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003126","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy is performed to prevent osteoarthritis caused by developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). To achieve sufficient acetabular coverage, understanding the characteristics of acetabular coverage in DDH is necessary. However, the features of acetabular coverage in males with DDH remain unclear. We thought that the differences in acetabular coverage between females and males might be associated with the differences in pelvic morphology between the sexes.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) What are the differences in the acetabular coverage between females and males with DDH? (2) What are the differences in the rotations of the ilium and ischium between females and males with DDH? (3) What is the relationship between the rotation of the ilium and ischium and the acetabular coverage at each height in females and males with DDH?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between 2016 and 2023, 114 patients (138 hips) underwent eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy at our hospital. We excluded patients with Tönnis Grade 2 or higher, a lateral center-edge angle of 25º or more, and deformities of the pelvis or femur, resulting in 100 patients (122 hips) being included. For female patients (98 hips), the median (range) age was 40 years (10 to 58), and for the male patients (24 hips), it was 31 years (14 to 53). We used all patients' preoperative AP radiographs and CT data. The crossover sign, posterior wall sign, and pelvic width index were evaluated in AP radiographs. The rotation of the innominate bone in the axial plane was evaluated at two different heights, specifically at the slice passing through the anterior superior iliac spine and the slice through the pubic symphysis and ischial spine in CT data. Furthermore, we evaluated the anterior and posterior acetabular sector angles. Comparisons of variables related to innominate bone measurements and acetabular coverage measurements between females and males in each patient were performed. The correlations between pelvic morphology measurements and acetabular coverage were evaluated separately for females and males, and the results were subsequently compared to identify any sex-specific differences. For continuous variables, we used the Student t-test; for binary variables, we used the Fisher exact test. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the evaluation of AP radiographs, an indicator of acetabular retroversion-the crossover sign-showed no differences between the sexes, whereas the posterior wall sign (females 46% [45 of 98] hips versus males 75% [18 of 24] hips, OR 3.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20 to 11.71]; p = 0.01) and pelvic width index less than 56% (females 1% [1 of 98] versus males 17% [4 of 24], OR 18.71 [95% CI 1.74 to 958.90]; p = 0.005) occurred more frequently in males than in females. There were no differences in the iliac rotation parameters,","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1971-1983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469820/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141598791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"CORR Insights®: Is Ocular Safety in Orthopaedics Overlooked? A Systematic Review of Annual Ocular Radiation Exposure and Protective Measures.","authors":"David Gendelberg","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003233","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003233","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"1968-1970"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469863/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142003767","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Acquired Acromion Compromise, Including Thinning and Fragmentation, Is Not Associated With Poor Outcomes After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"Su Cheol Kim, Jong Hun Park, Hyun Gon Kim, Dae Yeung Kim, Sang Min Lee, Jae Chul Yoo","doi":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003131","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CORR.0000000000003131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acquired acromial compromise, including thinning (less than 30% of the normal acromion) or fragmentation resulting from acromiohumeral impingement or previous acromioplasty, is a concern in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This condition may lead to shoulder pain and difficulties in arm elevation because of acromial insufficiency fracture.</p><p><strong>Questions/purposes: </strong>(1) Do patients with acromial compromise (thinning less than 30% of normal acromion or fragmentation) have worse functional outcome scores, ROM, and strength after RSA compared with patients without acromial compromise? (2) Are patients with acromial compromise at a higher risk of complications such as acromial insufficiency fracture after RSA? (3) Do patients who develop acromial insufficiency fracture have predisposing associated factors and worse clinical outcomes?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, we treated 398 patients with RSA, and all patients were considered potentially eligible for this study. Our clinic is part of the orthopaedic department within a tertiary general hospital, serving patients from across the country. Among them, 49% (197 of 398) of patients were excluded for the following reasons: 8% (31 of 398) because of proximal humerus fracture, 5% (19 of 398) because of osteonecrosis, 9% (35 of 398) because of previous infective arthritis, 5% (18 of 398) because of a deformed shoulder, 4% (14 of 398) because of poor general condition after surgery, 3% (12 of 398) because of death, and another 17% (68 of 398) were lost before the minimum study follow-up, leaving 51% (201 of 398) for analysis. A preoperative acromial compromise was defined as follows: (1) thinning of the acromion (< 3 mm), which means a thickness of less than 30% of the normal acromion thickness (8 to 9 mm), and (2) acromial fragmentation. Acromial thickness was measured using a CT scan. The middle portion of the anterolateral acromion, situated lateral to the distal end of the clavicle, was crosschecked using the axial view. Measurements were subsequently performed from both coronal and sagittal views. In all, 29 patients with acromion compromise and 172 without acromion compromise met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no differential loss to follow-up before 2 years between patients with and without acromial compromise in this study (36% [16 of 45] versus 23% [52 of 224]; p = 0.12). We matched patients using propensity score, pairing them in a 1:3 ratio based on gender, age, bone mineral density, diagnosis, previous rotator cuff repair surgery, subscapularis repair or latissimus dorsi transfer performed during surgery, the type of prosthesis used, and follow-up duration. Twenty-three patients with acromial compromise (acromion compromised group) and 69 patients without acromial compromise (normal control group) were matched; the mean ± SD duration of follow-up was 40 ± 22 months in those with","PeriodicalId":10404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®","volume":" ","pages":"2001-2013"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11469824/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141283107","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}