{"title":"Judge rules in favor of former employee","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41699","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41699","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Roncone v. The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center</i>, No. 3:23-CV-2526 (N.D. Tex. 06/13/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Court rules against former coach","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41691","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41691","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Joseph v. Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia, et al</i>., No. 23-11037, No. 23-12475 (11th Cir. 04/08/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Religious rights continue to garner attention from Supreme Court, with likely impacts on campus","authors":"Michael Porter Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41685","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41685","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, a significant number of religious freedom cases have made their way to the Supreme Court. And individuals asserting religious rights have found a welcoming audience in a majority of the Supreme Court justices. As a result, the legal constructs under which religious issues have been evaluated for years cannot be relied upon. For many years, public institutions facing religious freedom issues had strong arguments when choosing an institutional priority over an individual religious right. The institution could assert that it would risk violating the Establishment Clause by appearing to favor religion by allowing an individual to invoke religion in certain circumstances. For example, in some circumstances, an institution might have precluded a student speaker at an event from making religious statements on those grounds — doing so now is more complicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":"3-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881236","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judge rules in favor of former students","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Springer, et al. v. Johnson & Wales University</i>, No. 24-cv-399, No. 24-cv-409 (D. R.I. 04/30/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Court rules in favor of university","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41700","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Viewpoint Neutrality Now!, et al. v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota, et al</i>., No. 24-655 (U.S. 04/21/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":"12-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judge rules in favor of former employee","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41701","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41701","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>McManus-McCoy v. Coker University</i>, No. 4:24-cv-02860 (D. S.C. 05/27/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Court rules against student-athlete","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41690","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Demarcus, et al. v. University of South Alabama</i>, No. 23-11670 (11th Cir. 04/10/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Did court dismiss coach's retaliation claim?","authors":"Eric Lyerly Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41688","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41688","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Greenville University hired a former softball player and alumna to serve as head softball coach. She was recruited by the athletics director, who encouraged her to apply for the position. The coach's first season was characterized by internal conflict. Her graduate assistant, a former player with close ties to team members, allegedly conspired with players to undermine the coach and make false accusations against her. The team finished with a 9–15 record that season.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144881478","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Judge rules against student-athlete","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41668","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Doe v. Eastern New Mexico University Board of Regents, et al</i>., No. 23-362 (D. N.M. 03/31/25).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144615421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
