Intensive & critical care nursing最新文献

Factors influencing high-flow nasal cannula success in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure - Response to Fang et al. 影响急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者高流量鼻插管成功的因素——对Fang等人的反应。

Intensive & critical care nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104100

Annette Zevallos-Villegas, Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio, Alberto Najera, Juan D Navarro-Lopez, Pedro Landete

引用次数: 0

Personalized approaches to ICU Distress: Moving beyond Survival toward holistic recovery. 个性化方法ICU窘迫：超越生存走向整体康复。

Intensive & critical care nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104091

Eunkyeong Oh, Alberto Lucchini, Peter Nydahl

引用次数: 0

High-flow nasal cannula monotherapy: Identifying suitable acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients - Response to Wei et al. 高流量鼻插管单药治疗：确定合适的急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者-对Wei等人的反应。

Intensive & critical care nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104102

Annette Zevallos-Villegas, Jesus Gonzalez-Rubio, Lydia Jimenez-Diaz, Fernando Neria Serrano, Pedro Landete

引用次数: 0

The utilization of a prone position model based on big data is deemed essential - Response to Liang et al. 利用基于大数据的俯卧位模型被认为是必不可少的-对Liang等人的回应。

Intensive & critical care nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103912

Yuhang Yan, Hongbin Hu, Zhongqing Chen

引用次数: 0

Potential issues related to subsyndromal delirium in the intensive care unit - Letter on Ma et al. 重症监护病房中与亚综合征性谵妄相关的潜在问题——Ma等人的信。

Intensive & critical care nursing Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103911

Ziyi Wang, Zihan Wang

引用次数: 0

Comparative risks and clinical outcomes of midazolam versus other intravenous sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. 咪达唑仑与其他静脉镇静剂在危重机械通气患者中的比较风险和临床结果：随机试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Intensive & critical care nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103945

Yu-Xin Chen, Mu-Hsing Ho

{"title":"Comparative risks and clinical outcomes of midazolam versus other intravenous sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Yu-Xin Chen, Mu-Hsing Ho","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103945","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103945","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This systematic review synthesized literature evidence and compared midazolam's risks and clinical outcomes with other sedatives in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients.Methods: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL without language restrictions. We used relative risk (RR) for binary outcomes and standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).Results: 17 RCTs involving 1509 patients were included. Compared to other sedatives, midazolam significantly increased the incidence of delirium (RR 2.39, 95 % CI, 1.75 to 3.26), the time up to extubation (SMD 1.99, 95 % CI, 0.81 to 3.16) and ICU length of stay (SMD 0.63, 95 % CI, 0.20 to 1.08), but significantly reduced the incidence of bradycardia (RR 0.52, 95 % CI, 0.36 to 0.76). No differences were identified in hypotension incidence (RR 0.69, 95 % CI, 0.37 to 1.31) or duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD 0.28, 95 % CI, -0.22 to 0.78).Conclusions: Midazolam caused a higher risk of delirium, a longer time up to extubation, and ICU length of stay, but a lower incidence of bradycardia. No significant evidence indicated midazolam was associated with a higher risk of hypotension or increased duration of mechanical ventilation.Implications for clinical practice: Clinicians should balance midazolam's potential risks with its benefits. While other sedatives may be catering to patients at a higher delirium risk, midazolam remains indispensable for hemodynamically compromised patients, such as those with bradycardia. Precise sedation management is crucial for patient safety and outcomes.","PeriodicalId":94043,"journal":{"name":"Intensive & critical care nursing","volume":" ","pages":"103945"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143018893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Intensive care nurses' experiences of caring. Part 1: Consideration of the concept of caring. 重症监护护士的护理经验。第一部分:对关怀概念的思考。

Intensive & critical care nursing Pub Date : 2000-04-01 DOI: 10.1054/ICCN.2000.1489

J. Beeby

引用次数: 57