International journal of brain and cognitive sciences最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Does Cognitive Dysfunction after Carotid Endarterectomy Vary by Statin Type or Dose? 颈动脉内膜切除术后认知功能障碍是否因他汀类药物类型或剂量而异?
Eric J Heyer, Joanna L Mergeche, Samuel S Bruce, E Sander Connolly
{"title":"Does Cognitive Dysfunction after Carotid Endarterectomy Vary by Statin Type or Dose?","authors":"Eric J Heyer,&nbsp;Joanna L Mergeche,&nbsp;Samuel S Bruce,&nbsp;E Sander Connolly","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our previous work demonstrates that asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients demonstrate less perioperative neurologic injury, defined as stroke and early cognitive dysfunction (eCD) observed within 24hr of CEA, when taking statins pre-operatively. This study examines whether the incidence of eCD observed 24hr after asymptomatic CEA varies as a function of statin type or dose. Patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis scheduled for CEA consented to participate in an observational IRB-approved study (N=324). Patients were evaluated with an extensive battery of neuropsychometric tests pre-operatively and 24hr post-operatively. Of the 324 consented patients, 200 were taking statins. Patients taking pravastatin and fluvastatin exhibited no eCD, while patients taking lovastatin (17.7%) and rosuvastatin (16.7%) exhibited incidences of eCD similar to those not taking statins (20.2%). Patients taking simvastatin exhibited a significantly lower incidence of eCD than those taking atorvastatin (3.0% vs. 16.0%, P=0.005). Patients taking a maximal dose of any statin exhibited a significantly lower incidence of eCD than patients taking sub-maximal doses (2.7% vs. 15.9%, P=0.002). These observations suggest that the incidence of eCD may in fact vary as a function of statin type and that maximal doses may be the optimal dose for patients undergoing CEA. This variation may be due to the physico-chemical properties of statins such as lipophilicity, molecular size, and blood brain barrier penetrability. These findings should be used to inspire randomized prospective work to determine the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of optimizing statin use prior to CEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":90541,"journal":{"name":"International journal of brain and cognitive sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151112/pdf/nihms520386.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32643219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信