West's Pacific reporter最新文献

Catholic Charities of Sacramento County v. Superior Court of Sacramento County. 萨克拉门托县天主教慈善机构诉萨克拉门托县高等法院。

West's Pacific reporter Pub Date : 2004-01-01

引用次数: 0

In re Guardianship of L.S. and H.S. 关于L.S.和H.S.的监护

West's Pacific reporter Pub Date : 2004-01-01

引用次数: 0

Baum v. Burrington. 鲍姆诉伯灵顿案。

West's Pacific reporter Pub Date : 2003-01-01

引用次数: 0

In re LePage. 在LePage。

West's Pacific reporter Pub Date : 2001-01-01

引用次数: 0

In re LePage. 在LePage。

West's Pacific reporter Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781316151334.219

{"title":"In re LePage.","authors":"","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781316151334.219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316151334.219","url":null,"abstract":"Court Decision: 18 Pacific Reporter, 3d Series 1177; 2001 Mar 8 (date of decision). The Supreme Court of Wyoming held that the state Department of Health was not authorized to inquire about the sincerity of a mother's religious beliefs when determining whether her daughter was exempt from a public school immunization requirement. Susan LePage submitted a request to the Department of Health seeking to exempt her daughter from receiving the hepatitis B vaccination. The Department of Health inquired into the sincerity of LePage's religious beliefs against vaccination and determined that her objections were of a personal or philosophical nature and not on religious grounds. The Department of Health denied LePage's request. The Supreme Court of Wyoming held that state law requires the Department of Health to grant an exemption upon the submission of a written objection and does not allow the Department of Health to make an inquiry into the sincerity of the requestor's religious beliefs. The court balanced a valid state interest in protecting schoolchildren from disease with the relatively low number of requests for exemption and its confidence in parents to make decisions in the best interest of their children's physical and spiritual health. Since there was no justification within the statute to allow a religious inquiry, the court held that the Department of Health had exceeded its authority with LePage. Furthermore, state law did not require a religious waiver to exempt a child from this particular vaccine. The lower court's holding was reversed.","PeriodicalId":83999,"journal":{"name":"West's Pacific reporter","volume":"18 1","pages":"1177-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"57119707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Urbish v. Lamm. Urbish诉Lamm案。

West's Pacific reporter Pub Date : 1988-01-01

引用次数: 0