发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Criminal law review (London, England)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Obstacles to fairness in criminal proceedings: Individual rights and institutional forms [Book review] 刑事诉讼公平的障碍：个人权利和制度形式[书评]
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI: 10.5040/9781782258384
E. Johnston
{"title":"Obstacles to fairness in criminal proceedings: Individual rights and institutional forms [Book review]","authors":"E. Johnston","doi":"10.5040/9781782258384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781782258384","url":null,"abstract":"This is a book review for Obstacles to Fairness in Criminal Proceedings: Individual Rights and Institutional Forms.","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42610873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Expert evidence and the Law Commission : implementation without legislation? 专家证据与法律委员会:没有立法的实施?
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9781315094205-24
T. Ward
{"title":"Expert evidence and the Law Commission : implementation without legislation?","authors":"T. Ward","doi":"10.4324/9781315094205-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094205-24","url":null,"abstract":"Argues that, despite a failure to implement the recommendations in the Law Commission's 2011 report entitled \"Expert Evidence in Criminal Proceedings\", many of its proposals on the exclusion of such evidence might be introduced by the judiciary's appropriate exercise of common law powers. Reviews the Commission's proposals, the common law principles determining when expert evidence is not admitted, and how such discretion could be used to exclude evidence failing the Commission's core test. Discusses the drawbacks of such an approach and whether the Commission proposals were too timid.","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":"561-576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70629449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Forensic science evidence in question 有问题的法医证据
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 2011-05-01 DOI: 10.4324/9781315094205-11
Mike Redmayne, P. Roberts, C. Aitken, G. Jackson
{"title":"Forensic science evidence in question","authors":"Mike Redmayne, P. Roberts, C. Aitken, G. Jackson","doi":"10.4324/9781315094205-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094205-11","url":null,"abstract":"Analyses the Court of Appeal judgment in R. v T in which the court in remarking on shoeprint comparison evidence considered how expert witnesses, in particular forensic scientists, should present their evidence in court and the types and quality of the data they can draw on when formulating their conclusions. Identifies what the court had to say about the methodology employed by the expert witness, in particular the use of likelihood ratios. Emphasises positive features of the judgment, rejecting interpretations which threaten to diminish the integrity and distort the probative value of scientific evidence.","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":"5 1","pages":"347-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70629768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61
The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications for, the ASBO 复合量刑原则:对反社会行为的中心地位及其启示
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 2006-03-14 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.890529
Stuart Macdonald
{"title":"The Principle of Composite Sentencing: Its Centrality to, and Implications for, the ASBO","authors":"Stuart Macdonald","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.890529","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.890529","url":null,"abstract":"The ASBO was designed for use in cases involving individuals who have persistently committed criminal acts of a certain level of seriousness in a particular area, making the lives of those living there unbearable. It was intended to provide a mechanism for the imposition of composite sentences on perpetrators of such behaviour - a sentence reflecting the aggregate impact of their course of conduct as opposed to the seriousness of a single criminal act. This article argues that, even though the severe maximum sentence for breach of an ASBO can only be justified by reference to the principle of composite sentencing, the courts have denied the role of this principle. This has resulted in confusion, not only over the penalties which should be applied to individuals found to have breached their ASBO, but also over the role of the remedy itself. The article argues that the principle of composite sentencing should be recognised as an integral feature of the ASBO's design, and outlines three implications which would follow for the remedy.","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":"2006 1","pages":"791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2139/SSRN.890529","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67858781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Euthanasia and the Defence of Necessity: advocating a more appropriate legal response 安乐死与必要性辩护:倡导更适当的法律回应
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 2005-05-01 DOI: 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199228294.003.0006
S. Ost
{"title":"Euthanasia and the Defence of Necessity: advocating a more appropriate legal response","authors":"S. Ost","doi":"10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199228294.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199228294.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses the question of whether the defence of necessity could be utilised in cases of euthanasia in the medical context. It challenges the application of the doctrine of double effect as a means of ascertaining the physician's primary intent and argues instead that the law should recognise that the physician faces a situation of necessity. It asserts that given the potential availability of the defence of diminished responsibility to a relative or spouse who carries out a mercy killing, not allowing the physician to utilise the defence of necessity may place him at greater risk of conviction for murder than the layperson.","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":"355-370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60647909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Legislative technique and human rights: the sad case of assisted suicide. 立法技术与人权:协助自杀的悲惨案例。
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 2003-01-01
Richard H S Tur
{"title":"Legislative technique and human rights: the sad case of assisted suicide.","authors":"Richard H S Tur","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ths article reviews the issues raised by the case of Diane Pretty and argues that contrary to the views of the English Courts and the European Court of Human Rights, section 2 of the Suicide Act 1961 is incompatible with the Convention. Failing legislative reform, the DPP should formulate and publicise criteria for the exercise of its consent to prosecution in cases of assisted suicide.</p>","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25906868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Necessity, private defence and the killing of Mary. 需要，私人辩护和杀害玛丽。
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 2001-07-01
J Rogers
{"title":"Necessity, private defence and the killing of Mary.","authors":"J Rogers","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the reasons used by the Court of Appeal in Re A (Children) to authorise and justify an operation which would inevitably kill the weaker of a pair of conjoined twins in order to offer the stronger twin a good chance of a long and happy life. The crux of the judgment was that a utilitarian theory of necessity could justify this operation. This article seeks to define the criminal law defences at issue in the case and to argue that utilitarian necessity is such a dangerous doctrine that it should never be employed if there is any other defence which can be made to serve the same purpose--as there was in the present case.</p>","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"515-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25963187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A new direction on DNA? DNA研究的新方向?
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 1998-07-01
K Hunter
{"title":"A new direction on DNA?","authors":"K Hunter","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"478-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1998-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25962746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Euthanasia and death with dignity: still poised on the fulcrum of homicide. 安乐死和有尊严的死亡:仍然站在杀人的支点上。
Criminal law review (London, England) Pub Date : 1996-12-01
H Biggs
{"title":"Euthanasia and death with dignity: still poised on the fulcrum of homicide.","authors":"H Biggs","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article questions whether the law of homicide is an appropriate mechanism to adjudicate the humanitarian issues involved in voluntary euthanasia; particularly where painful protracted dying appears inherently more harmful than euthanasia. The author suggests that even if euthanasia can provide death with dignity this will not be achieved while the law requires the undignified criminalisation of the practitioner.</p>","PeriodicalId":81026,"journal":{"name":"Criminal law review (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"878-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25235186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书