Chicano law review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Chicanas and the issue of involuntary sterilization: reforms needed to protect informed consent. 墨西哥人与非自愿绝育问题:需要改革以保护知情同意。
Chicano law review Pub Date : 1976-01-01 DOI: 10.4324/9781003059141-14
Antonia Hernández
{"title":"Chicanas and the issue of involuntary sterilization: reforms needed to protect informed consent.","authors":"Antonia Hernández","doi":"10.4324/9781003059141-14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003059141-14","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to inform the public and its government representatives about practices which have caused the involuntary sterilization of Chicanas. These unauthorized medical practices have occurred within the area presently governed by laws which sanction voluntary sterilization. The right to procure a voluntary sterilization is not challenged, but the duty to provide an opportunity to render informed consent is in need of more stringent guarantees. In too many instances women have been coerced into undergoing sterilization surgery without their informed consent. Most of the areas to be reviewed involve women who are poor, usually on welfare, and of a racial minority. With respect to Chicanas an additional element, lack of English fluency, deserves considerable attention. Furthermore, any concrete form of analysis cannot ignore the fact that women eligible for welfare not only must contend with the doctor-patient relationship, but also with government participation- At present, the federal and state governments provide substantial assistance to hospitals and women unable to afford medical care on their own. Consequently, doctors and hospitals which receive government subsidies to perform sterilization surgery, but violate a patient's right to informed consent, not only violate existing government regulations but raise the issue of inadequate government enforcement. A thorough examination of this topic would not be complete without some understanding of the attitudes which cause unwanted sterilizations. Special focus will be directed toward the ethical beliefs held by many medical practitioners, and the transference of these beliefs into nationwide practice. The interrelationship between government and the medical profession also requires some mention of the Supreme Court decision in Buck v. Bell.' A state","PeriodicalId":80918,"journal":{"name":"Chicano law review","volume":"3 3 1","pages":"3-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1976-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70619457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信