ACM transactions on evolutionary learning and optimization最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Survival-LCS: Rule-Based Survival Analysis without Proportional Hazard Assumptions. 生存- lcs:无比例风险假设的基于规则的生存分析
ACM transactions on evolutionary learning and optimization Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-29 DOI: 10.1145/3772719
Alexa A Woodward, Harsh Bandhey, Jason H Moore, Ryan J Urbanowicz
{"title":"Survival-LCS: Rule-Based Survival Analysis without Proportional Hazard Assumptions.","authors":"Alexa A Woodward, Harsh Bandhey, Jason H Moore, Ryan J Urbanowicz","doi":"10.1145/3772719","DOIUrl":"10.1145/3772719","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Survival analysis is widely utilized to model time-to-event data across biomedical, epidemiological, and engineering domains. However, traditional methods such as Cox regression impose strong assumptions, including proportional hazards, and are often inadequate for capturing complex, non-linear relationships in high-dimensional or heterogeneous data. Rule-based machine learning algorithms, such as \"ExSTraCS,\" can interpretably model complex biomedical associations in classification tasks. This study extends ExSTraCS to the challenges of right-censored survival data to yield \"Survival-LCS,\" the first rule-based survival analysis algorithm that additionally handles heterogeneous feature types and missing values and makes no assumptions about baseline hazard or survival time distributions. Survival-LCS is evaluated and compared across a variety of simulated genetic survival datasets covering distinct genetic architectures (additive, epistatic, heterogeneous, and univariate), censoring values, number of features, and survival distributions (random monotonic spline, Gamma, Gaussian, and Weibull) using Integrated Brier Scores and statistical significance testing. Results demonstrate that Survival-LCS reliably captures complex associations with survival outcomes, performing competitively with standard approaches, particularly in settings that challenge traditional models. This work highlights the capability of rule-based algorithms to be adapted as interpretable, assumption-free (i.e., data-driven) survival analysis methods, particularly in domains with higher-dimensional data or complex underlying associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":524178,"journal":{"name":"ACM transactions on evolutionary learning and optimization","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13532393/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148877189","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书