Erdélyi Jogélet最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Rules on Liability for Damage Caused During the Service Relationship of Judges I 法官职务关系中损害赔偿责任规则1
Erdélyi Jogélet Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI: 10.47745/erjog.2025.03.05
Court clerk, District Court of Eger, Eger, Andrea Jónás
{"title":"Rules on Liability for Damage Caused During the Service Relationship of Judges I","authors":"Court clerk, District Court of Eger, Eger, Andrea Jónás","doi":"10.47745/erjog.2025.03.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47745/erjog.2025.03.05","url":null,"abstract":"For many centuries, liability for damage caused in the exercise of public authority – including judicial powers – was an unknown concept in highly organized societies. An exceptionally long historical process was required to move from lay adjudication – which demanded no specialized legal expertise – to the establishment of the judicial institutional system as it is known today. Given that judges initially exercised their functions within the framework of the administration of justice regarded first as a royal prerogative and later as a privilege of the state, the exercise of judicial power and its origins were consistently shaped by prevailing ideologies. These ideologies determined whether judges could be held accountable for their actions or liability was excluded altogether. The concept of judicial liability first emerged in the Ancient Roman Empire during the imperial period, recognizing the personal responsibility of judges for damage caused in the course of judicial proceedings. Both in the generalmedieval development of tort law and Hungarian law in particular, it can be stated that the possibility of imposing personal liability on judges for damage caused in the exercise of judicial authority was recognized only within a narrowly defined scope. The modern legal framework governing liability for damage caused in the exercise of public authority was first articulated in the nineteenth century, notably in the French Civil Code, followed by the Austrian Civil Code (ABGB) and the German Civil Code (BGB). Judicial power, as a constituent prerogative of royal authority, preserved its inviolability and immunity from liability for centuries. It was only the profound social and jurisprudential transformations of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries that succeeded in breaching this protective shield. Nevertheless, it was in the twentieth century – through the broad acceptance of the general principles of compensation – that the gradual dismantling of judicial immunity truly began.","PeriodicalId":521608,"journal":{"name":"Erdélyi Jogélet","volume":"6 3","pages":"80-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147882458","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书