Issues in interdisciplinary studies (Association for Interdisciplinary Studies)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Integrative Topologies: Customizable Models for Crossdisciplinary Knowledge Integration. 集成拓扑:跨学科知识集成的可定制模型。
Bethany Laursen
{"title":"Integrative Topologies: Customizable Models for Crossdisciplinary Knowledge Integration.","authors":"Bethany Laursen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge integration remains, paradoxically, both a key methodology and an elusive mystery in crossdisciplinary work such as interdisciplinary studies, team science, and transdisciplinary research. Many case studies have described compound events and iterations leading to remarkable integrative achievements. Even though a wealth of work on integration indicates that such achievements are common and desirable, there is no context-crossing approach to modeling how multiple integrations can connect to generate larger or more complex integrative results. There is thus an important need to develop an approach for unfolding integration that supports the full variety of integrative practices and theories. In the absence of such an approach, theorists and practitioners must either craft unique accounts for each case-which are difficult both to create and transfer-or reach general conclusions about what the smaller integrations have in common. This article draws upon and contributes to the philosophy of interdisciplinarity, proposing a new, structural approach to modeling connected integrations called <i>integrative topologies</i>. Each topology provides a model of connected integrations that can be customized for different situations instead of starting from scratch or abstracting away from intermediate integrations. First, the article develops simple rules for integrative pathways based on the input-process-output model of integration. Then, the weave, zipper, and chain topologies are introduced along with their hybrids. Next, the article illustrates how integrative topologies can make it easier to teach, plan, facilitate, describe, and evaluate complex combinations of expertise in crossdisciplinary work. The article concludes with areas for future philosophical research on knowledge integration.</p>","PeriodicalId":520974,"journal":{"name":"Issues in interdisciplinary studies (Association for Interdisciplinary Studies)","volume":"42 1-2","pages":"105-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12327073/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144796662","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书