ASIDE gastroenterologyPub Date : 2025-05-01Epub Date: 2025-03-11DOI: 10.71079/aside.gi.0109257
Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Abdelmalek Abdelghany, Arshia Sethi, Abdellatif Ismail, Doha Mohamed, Moataz Aboeldahb, Omar Abdelhalim, Islam Mohamed, Ahmed Y Azzam, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, David J Altschul, Mahmoud Nassar, Mohammad Bilal
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunctive Sedative in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Abdelmalek Abdelghany, Arshia Sethi, Abdellatif Ismail, Doha Mohamed, Moataz Aboeldahb, Omar Abdelhalim, Islam Mohamed, Ahmed Y Azzam, Muhammed Amir Essibayi, David J Altschul, Mahmoud Nassar, Mohammad Bilal","doi":"10.71079/aside.gi.0109257","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.71079/aside.gi.0109257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique for removing dysplastic lesions in the gastrointestinal tract but carries risks like pain and perforation. Dexmedetomidine, an α2-receptor agonist, offers potential benefits as an adjunct sedative during ESD by providing anxiolysis and analgesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses its efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We searched databases including Embase, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to April 21, 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies used dexmedetomidine with other sedatives for ESD. We analyzed outcomes such as en-bloc and complete resection rates, sedation duration, and adverse events, using RevMan for meta-analysis with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search retrieved 216 studies and after screening, eight studies were included in the final analysis. Dexmedetomidine showed no significant difference in en-bloc or complete resection rates compared to controls. Sedation and procedure times were similar between the two groups as well. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced restlessness (OR 0.15, 95% CI:0.07 to 0.29) and increased bradycardia (OR 7.15, 95% CI 3.17 to 16.11) compared to controls. Upon subgroup analysis, Dexmedetomidine plus Propofol, and Dexmedetomidine plus Midazolam, revealed the same findings regarding restlessness and bradycardia compared to controls which confirmed the adjunctive effects of Dexmedetomidine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine as an adjunctive sedative appears safe and effective in ESD, reducing restlessness without significant adverse events. The risk of bradycardia is increased, which may be reflective of reduced physiological stress. Future studies should explore optimal dosing and compare Dexmedetomidine with other sedatives in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520504,"journal":{"name":"ASIDE gastroenterology","volume":"1 1","pages":"7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11994092/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144049317","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}