Journal of cancer prevention & current research最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Implementation of risk assessment process for breast cancer risk in primary care. 在初级保健中实施乳腺癌风险评估程序。
Journal of cancer prevention & current research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI: 10.15406/jcpcr.2024.15.00552
Sarah Tucker Marrison, Caitlin G Allen, Kevin Hughes, Holly Raines, Mattie Banks, Travita Lee, Kiersten Meeder, Vanessa Diaz
{"title":"Implementation of risk assessment process for breast cancer risk in primary care.","authors":"Sarah Tucker Marrison, Caitlin G Allen, Kevin Hughes, Holly Raines, Mattie Banks, Travita Lee, Kiersten Meeder, Vanessa Diaz","doi":"10.15406/jcpcr.2024.15.00552","DOIUrl":"10.15406/jcpcr.2024.15.00552","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current cancer prevention guidelines recommend assessing breast cancer risk using validated risk calculators such as Tyrer-Cuzick and assessing genetic testing eligibility with NCCN. Women at high-risk of breast cancer may be recommended to undergo additional or earlier screening. Risk assessment is not consistently implemented in the primary care setting resulting in increased morbidity and mortality in unidentified high-risk individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-arm interventional study was conducted in an academic primary care clinic for women 25-50 years old presenting for primary care appointments. Pre-visit workflows evaluated breast cancer risk using the Cancer Risk Assessment (CRA) Tool and information was provided to the clinician with guideline-based recommendations. Post-visit questionnaires and chart review were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 24.5% (144/587) with 80.3% of responses completed online (94/117). The average age of respondents was 35.8 years with 50.4% White and 35.9% Black. There were no differences in response rate based on race. Risk discussion was documented in the medical record in 15.4% of cases with a higher rate of documentation in high-risk patient based on risk assessment as compared with average risk respondents (34.6% vs. 9.7%, p<0.01). In the high-risk women identified 11.4% (4/35) were seen by the high-risk breast clinic, and 5.7% (2/35) were referred for genetic evaluation. None had previously obtained MRI screening or genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited identification and evaluation of women at high risk for breast cancer. Pre-visit surveys can be used as a tool to assess breast cancer risk in the primary care setting; however additional strategies are needed to implement systematic risk assessment and facilitate appropriate treatment based on risk level.</p>","PeriodicalId":520235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer prevention & current research","volume":"15 3","pages":"65-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11434167/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142336208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信