发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Rationalism Critical and Pancritical: What Did Popper and Bartley Disagree About? 批判的理性主义与泛批判的理性主义：波普尔与巴特利的分歧在哪里？
HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2024-04-23 DOI: 10.1086/730948
D. Sepetyi
{"title":"Rationalism Critical and Pancritical: What Did Popper and Bartley Disagree About?","authors":"D. Sepetyi","doi":"10.1086/730948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/730948","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":518263,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140670772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Otto Neurath’s Modernist Utopianism: Linking the Vienna Circle and H.G. Wells 奥托-诺伊拉斯的现代乌托邦主义：将维也纳圈与 H.G. 威尔斯联系起来
HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.1086/729321
Ivan Ferreira da Cunha
{"title":"Otto Neurath’s Modernist Utopianism: Linking the Vienna Circle and H.G. Wells","authors":"Ivan Ferreira da Cunha","doi":"10.1086/729321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/729321","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":518263,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140531953","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Scientific Method, Induction and Probability: The Whewell-De Morgan Debate on Baconianism, 1830s-1850s 科学方法、归纳和概率：19 世纪 30 年代至 1850 年代惠威尔-德-摩根关于培根主义的辩论
HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI: 10.1086/726276
L. Verburgt
{"title":"Scientific Method, Induction and Probability: The Whewell-De Morgan Debate on Baconianism, 1830s-1850s","authors":"L. Verburgt","doi":"10.1086/726276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726276","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":518263,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"24 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140531983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书