Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Weighting Content Specifications for the National Medical Licensing Examination via Group Analytic Hierarchy Process 通过分组层次分析法确定国家医师资格考试内容规范的权重
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI: 10.1111/emip.12620
Xiaomei Hong, Zhehan Jiang, Hanyu Liu, Fen Cai
{"title":"Weighting Content Specifications for the National Medical Licensing Examination via Group Analytic Hierarchy Process","authors":"Xiaomei Hong, Zhehan Jiang, Hanyu Liu, Fen Cai","doi":"10.1111/emip.12620","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12620","url":null,"abstract":"Job and practice analysis is a commonly used method for determining examination content specifications. However, difficulties arise when many domains are present, as mainstream approaches do not fully adhere to the essence of the weighing process, namely a “comparison‐evaluation‐decision” framework for assigning percentage values to the content. Stemming from the principle of comparing multiple criteria for making decisions, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) provides an appropriate solution that circumvents the aforementioned obstacle. We propose using an extended version of AHP called Group AHP (GAHP) to weight content specifications for standardized medical education assessment. Specifically, GAHP is integrated with the Delphi method and expected to aid exam developers in integrating feedback from diverse experienced physicians when determining content specifications for the National Medical Licensing Examination (NMLE) in China. The complete flow of the proposed approach was demonstrated in this study with an application to the NMLE.","PeriodicalId":516921,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice","volume":" April","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141823629","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Item Response Theory Models for Polytomous Multidimensional Forced‐Choice Items to Measure Construct Differentiation 用于测量结构差异的多项式多维强迫选择题的项目反应理论模型
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI: 10.1111/emip.12621
Xuelan Qiu, Jimmy de la Torre, You‐Gan Wang, Jinran Wu
{"title":"Item Response Theory Models for Polytomous Multidimensional Forced‐Choice Items to Measure Construct Differentiation","authors":"Xuelan Qiu, Jimmy de la Torre, You‐Gan Wang, Jinran Wu","doi":"10.1111/emip.12621","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12621","url":null,"abstract":"Multidimensional forced‐choice (MFC) items have been found to be useful to reduce response biases in personality assessments. However, conventional scoring methods for the MFC items result in ipsative data, hindering the wider applications of the MFC format. In the last decade, a number of item response theory (IRT) models have been developed, majority of which are for MFC items with binary responses. However, MFC items with polytomous responses are more informative and have many applications. This paper develops a polytomous Rasch ipsative model (pRIM) that can deal with ipsative data and yield estimates that measure construct differentiation—a latent trait that describes the degree to which the personality constructs (e.g., interests) distinguish between each other. The pRIM and its simpler form are applied to a career interests assessment containing four‐category MFC items and the measures of interests differentiation are used for both intra‐ and interpersonal comparisons. Simulations are conducted to examine the recovery of the parameters under various conditions. The results show that the parameters of the pRIM can be well recovered, particularly when a complete linking design and a large sample are used. The implications and application of the pRIM in the personality assessment using MFC items are discussed.","PeriodicalId":516921,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice","volume":"111 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141362892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信