Shibeal O’ Flaherty, Lizzie Martin, Syon Bhanot, Crystal Hall, Sebastian Jilke, Tyler Simko, Mary Steffel
{"title":"How academics and policymakers can collaborate effectively: Lessons from using behavioral science to improve U.S. federal government policies","authors":"Shibeal O’ Flaherty, Lizzie Martin, Syon Bhanot, Crystal Hall, Sebastian Jilke, Tyler Simko, Mary Steffel","doi":"10.1177/23794607241264102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241264102","url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. government administers many public programs and services. Creating programs that work requires an understanding of the psychological processes that influence behavior. To this end, policymakers may collaborate with academics who have expertise in behavioral science to generate ideas for improving existing programs, procedures, or policies; to test existing programs; or to design wholly new programs that address societal problems. Such collaborations also enable academics to test new or established theories in real-world settings. In this article, we draw on our collective experience in the U.S. Office of Evaluation Sciences, where we have worked on studies that evaluate various federal programs, to outline some of the core issues that make research collaborations between academics and government agents challenging. We also offer tips for making these partnerships productive and mutually beneficial.","PeriodicalId":511381,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science & Policy","volume":"57 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141799430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bridging the divide between the potential & practice of behavioral science in the private sector","authors":"Scott Young","doi":"10.1177/23794607241263414","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241263414","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores why private sector adoption of behavioral science has been limited and shares strategies for expanding its integration into businesses. After outlining three core barriers to adoption, the author proposes solutions for more effectively communicating the field’s value to business leaders—solutions rooted in his personal experience and supported by observations shared by other successful practitioners. He then focuses on actions that the broader behavioral science community (including academics, policymakers, and practitioners) can take to promote the private sector’s long-term adoption of behavioral science.","PeriodicalId":511381,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science & Policy","volume":"24 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141799500","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Evidence-based decision-making is a social endeavor","authors":"Farimah HakemZadeh, Denise M. Rousseau","doi":"10.1177/23794607241265206","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241265206","url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based decision-making (EBDM)—using the best available evidence from multiple sources to make informed decisions—is critical to the successful functioning of any organization. Much of the literature on EBDM has focused on the decision-maker as an individual. Yet to be most efficient and effective, EBDM requires extensive communication with others. Our review of the body of research on EBDM shows that it is typical for several individuals and groups to contribute to evidence-based decisions. These varied participants provide the skills and knowledge needed to incorporate diverse types of evidence into the decision process. We have found that conversations and interactions through three distinct networks contribute to successful EBDM. These networks consist of decision-makers and their staff and either (a) researchers in a relevant field; (b) stakeholders in the community or organization; or (c) colleagues with similar responsibilities and challenges, which we call communities of practice. Building social connections with people in each of these networks enhances a person’s ability to make good decisions for an organization. It is therefore imperative that organizations engaging in EBDM have ongoing programs and policies geared toward creating and maintaining these three critical connections.","PeriodicalId":511381,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science & Policy","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141800859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Contradictions that erode institutional trust & opportunities for addressing them","authors":"Chris P. Long, Sim B. Sitkin","doi":"10.1177/23794607241256709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241256709","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we identify institutional contradictions as a central challenge that institutions must address to develop and maintain stakeholder trust. Institutional contradictions occur when institutions present stakeholders with inconsistent or conflicting decisions, statements, ideas, or actions. Drawing on both the organizational literature and the findings presented by articles in the Spotlight section of this issue, we describe the nature and antecedents of institutional contradictions and how they can compromise trust development and foment distrust. In addition, we propose ways for institutions to identify and remediate the processes that lead to institutional contradictions.","PeriodicalId":511381,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science & Policy","volume":"85 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141352923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Overcoming political polarization: Strategies for diminishing intransigence and reducing intergroup animus","authors":"David M. Bersoff","doi":"10.1177/23794607241238037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607241238037","url":null,"abstract":"Data from over 25,000 nationally representative respondents to an online survey conducted in 22 countries were analyzed to understand the predictors and potential mitigators of political polarization. The analysis yielded two key findings. First, perceiving that your country is very divided on key societal issues is not by itself enough to generate affective polarization, the state in which groups that differ ideologically feel hostile toward each other and are unwilling to collaborate in constructive problem-solving: a belief that the ideological divisions are not likely to be overcome is also required. This finding suggests that affective polarization may be mitigated by new types of interventions that try to change perceptions of the dispute itself rather than views of the combatants. Instead of attempting to decrease intergroup animus, such interventions would aim to increase confidence or engagement in dispute-resolution processes. Second, employers were the only institution examined that were able to garner the trust of people who saw their country’s ideological divisions as insurmountable. This ability puts employers in a unique position to address polarization durably and at scale, especially when it comes to interventions centered on fostering positive interactions.","PeriodicalId":511381,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science & Policy","volume":"15 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140727352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Hope and despair: Implications for life outcomes and policy","authors":"Carol Graham","doi":"10.1177/23794607231222529","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607231222529","url":null,"abstract":"People’s ratings of life satisfaction, hope, and other dimensions of their well-being have become important metrics in disciplines such as economics and public health because they predict health, productivity, employment, and other social outcomes. Recent research suggests that hope, which can be measured with survey instruments, is the most important dimension of well-being for predicting future outcomes for individuals and society. Trends in hope have been tracked as a key factor in the rising numbers of U.S. deaths of despair—a term that encompasses suicide, overdoses, and alcohol-related mortality. Surveys of hope among low-income adolescents in Lima, Peru, and St. Louis, Missouri, have shown that those who have hope for the future—and who are often supported by a mentor—are more likely to invest effort in their education and avoid risky behaviors. By contrast, individuals in despair are unlikely to respond to incentives or opportunities and are vulnerable to misinformation and conspiracy theories. This article provides evidence that hope influences social and economic outcomes and examples of policies that can help restore hope in populations that have lost it. Preventing another generation from falling into despair is essential to a society’s health and security.","PeriodicalId":511381,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Science & Policy","volume":"10 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139439864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}