Functions of Language最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
‘What we found is’ 我们发现
Functions of Language Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1075/fol.23054.ber
Florine Berthe, Anita Fetzer, Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell
{"title":"‘What we found is’","authors":"Florine Berthe, Anita Fetzer, Isabelle Gaudy-Campbell","doi":"10.1075/fol.23054.ber","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23054.ber","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This paper examines two variants of the pseudo-cleft construction which display a WHAT-NP-VP-be pattern with the\u0000 VP realised with cognitive verbs and the proform do in the context of spoken British English dyadic and\u0000 multi-party BBC podcasts. It is based on the premise that the construction’s referencing potentials are both cataphoric and\u0000 projective, and that depending on its contexts, one of the two referencing functions is foregrounded while the other is\u0000 backgrounded. The analysis focuses on those linguistic features and contextual configurations which either contribute to its\u0000 cataphoric referencing function, or which go beyond the local cataphoric referencing function and indicate its projective,\u0000 discourse-organising function. The research is corpus-based and uses quantitative and qualitative methodologies, filtering out the\u0000 linguistic features and contextual configurations which contribute to assigning the two variants the status of a projective\u0000 construction with a discourse-organising function. The features under investigation are (1) the semantics of the constitutive NPs\u0000 and VPs marking for tense, aspect and modality and their uptake in the discourse, (2) degrees of continuity and discontinuity in\u0000 the cohesive chains triggered by the constitutive parts of the construction. The paper shows that when semantic continuity between\u0000 the what-clause and what follows is discontinued and thus deferred, the construction’s projective function is\u0000 foregrounded.","PeriodicalId":502755,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":"16 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141648079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional transition from hear to nonvisual sensory and hearsay evidential categories 从听觉到非视觉感官和传闻证据类别的功能过渡
Functions of Language Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI: 10.1075/fol.22059.suz
Hiroyuki Suzuki
{"title":"Functional transition from hear\u0000 to nonvisual sensory and hearsay evidential categories","authors":"Hiroyuki Suzuki","doi":"10.1075/fol.22059.suz","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22059.suz","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 This article presents a development of evidential categories derived from a verb related to the auditory sense in\u0000 the evidential system attested in rGyalthang Tibetan varieties. The language varieties under study possess a morphological\u0000 distinction of at least five evidentials in the access-to-information category and two evidentials in the source-of-information\u0000 category. The discussion focuses on one morpheme derived from the Literary Tibetan verb grag ‘resound, hear’ used\u0000 for both categories, and examines its process of grammaticalisation and degrammaticalisation. Elicited data illustrate the\u0000 following functions: (1) grag as a nonvisual sensory evidential suffix that was further degrammaticalised as a\u0000 copulative nonvisual sensory verb stem; (2) grag as a hearsay marker in a separate syntactic slot, which extended\u0000 from (1); and (3) grag as a lexical verb stem meaning ‘hear’ [the common origin to (1) and (2)], which underwent\u0000 two grammaticalisation processes.","PeriodicalId":502755,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141648577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Eyes do not lie but words do 眼睛不会说谎,但语言会
Functions of Language Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1075/fol.22061.ars
Seçkin Arslan, Elif Tutku Tunali, Yağmur Çetin, Özgür Aydın
{"title":"Eyes do not lie but words do","authors":"Seçkin Arslan, Elif Tutku Tunali, Yağmur Çetin, Özgür Aydın","doi":"10.1075/fol.22061.ars","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22061.ars","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Evidentiality encodes how a speaker has access to the information contained in his/her proposition. It has been\u0000 shown that some ‘evidential language’ speakers make a deliberate choice of evidentials while telling lies (Aikhenvald 2004). In this study, we recruited 40 native speakers of Turkish, an ‘evidential language’, to\u0000 judge statements with evidentials using an eye-movement-monitoring-during-reading study with an end-of-sentence deception\u0000 detection task. The participants read sentences with four conditions, containing a direct or indirect evidential form either\u0000 compatible or incompatible with the given information source. Our results show that the indirect evidential condition was detected\u0000 as a lie more often than the direct evidential condition. Readers had the tendency to judge stimulus material with\u0000 source-evidentiality mismatch to be untruthful. These findings were mirrored in the eye-movement data, as we found gaze duration\u0000 to be longer at the critical verb region for indirect evidential and mismatch conditions.","PeriodicalId":502755,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":"103 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141666148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The discourse functions of simple copulas in Dzongkha 宗卡语中简单共词的话语功能
Functions of Language Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI: 10.1075/fol.22056.wat
Stephen Watters
{"title":"The discourse functions of simple copulas in Dzongkha","authors":"Stephen Watters","doi":"10.1075/fol.22056.wat","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22056.wat","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 The marking on copular verbs in Tibetic languages is regarded as an exemplar of egophoricity, although the extent\u0000 to which it has been grammaticalized varies between languages. Dzongkha, a southern Tibetic language, is somewhat atypical of the\u0000 egophoric pattern in the sense that the basic opposition in copulas exhibits a mirative pattern, wherein the non-mirative\u0000 (egophoric) copula occurs with all grammatical persons in declaratives and interrogatives, and the mirative (non-egophoric) occurs\u0000 with the 3rd person and rarely with 1st and 2nd persons. The conversational data studied for this paper also show that the speaker\u0000 need not take knowledge stances that bifurcate the world between objectively ‘old’ and ‘new’ knowledge and the attendant\u0000 associations of knowledge with a particular grammatical person. Rather, the speaker’s representation of events is subjective, and\u0000 dependent, in part, on the knowledge stances between speaker and respondent. What is in view in conversational interaction are the\u0000 social goals of the conversation — assertions, face-saving strategies, and arriving at mutually shared knowledge — and the\u0000 Dzongkha copulas are a manipulable linguistic resource in achieving these.","PeriodicalId":502755,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":"123 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141665405","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Review of Steen (2023): Slowing Metaphor Down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory 评论 Steen (2023):让隐喻慢下来:阐述故意隐喻理论
Functions of Language Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1075/fol.00058.gao
Yang Gao, Deliang Wang
{"title":"Review of Steen (2023): Slowing Metaphor Down: Elaborating Deliberate Metaphor Theory","authors":"Yang Gao, Deliang Wang","doi":"10.1075/fol.00058.gao","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00058.gao","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":502755,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":"221 S716","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141039865","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信